Skip to main content

UPnP Device Host EUVDEUVD-2026-99579

| CVE-2026-85927 HIGH
Heap-based Buffer Overflow (CWE-122)
2026-10-13 secure@microsoft.com GHSA-9x5q-r6h6-hfxr
7.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: microsoft
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain local low-privileged access
  2. Exploit
    Send crafted data to UPnP Device Host
  3. Execution
    Trigger heap-based buffer overflow
  4. Impact
    Execute code as SYSTEM

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Heap buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires the attacker to already have local, authenticated low-privilege access to the host (PR:L) and the ability to reach the Windows UPnP Device Host service to deliver malformed input that corrupts the heap. The UPnP Device Host component must be present/active, which is standard on affected Windows client and server builds. Limiting factors: no remote network vector (AV:L) and no viable exploitation from an unauthenticated position - an initial foothold is a prerequisite; no user interaction is needed (UI:N). Fixed builds (e.g., 10.0.19044.7807, 10.0.26100.9711, 10.0.14393.9612 and the corresponding per-SKU builds) are not vulnerable.

Impact

This is a credible but not emergency-tier privilege-escalation flaw. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N) confirms it requires local access and existing low-level privileges, so it is a post-compromise escalation primitive rather than an initial-access vector - consistent with the description's 'authorized attacker ... locally' wording. CISA's SSVC framework reinforces lower urgency: Exploitation is 'none' (no observed or public exploitation) and Automatable is 'no' (cannot be mass/worm-scaled, fitting a local EoP), even though Technical Impact is 'total' (matching C:H/I:H/A:H, i.e. full SYSTEM compromise). No EPSS score was supplied in the input, and there is no KEV listing and no POC indicator, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified from the data. Signals are internally consistent - high technical impact but constrained reach - meaning this should be patched on a normal-to-prioritized cadence (it is a full-SYSTEM gain for any low-priv foothold) but is not a drop-everything issue absent active exploitation. The affected-version list spans essentially the entire supported Windows client and server fleet, which raises aggregate exposure despite the local-only vector.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who already has a low-privileged foothold on a Windows host (e.g., a standard user account or a compromised low-integrity process) supplies malicious input to the UPnP Device Host service to corrupt the heap and execute attacker-controlled code at SYSTEM. With AV:L/AC:L and no user interaction required, exploitation is reliable once local access exists. No public exploit code is identified in the provided data.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026

Heap-based buffer overflow in the Windows UPnP Device Host lets a locally authenticated low-privilege user corrupt heap memory inside a privileged Windows service and elevate to higher integrity/system-level privileges. Affected software spans Windows 10 (1607 through 22H2), Windows 11 (23H2 through 26H2), and Windows Server 2012, 2012 R2, 2016, 2019, 2022 and 2025, including Server Core installations; exploitation requires an existing local foothold (CVSS AV:L, PR:L) but no user interaction (UI:N), and successful triggering yields high confidentiality, integrity and availability impact. Per CISA's SSVC assessment exploitation is none and the issue is not automatable, and no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, so this is a credible but not emergency-tier privilege-escalation flaw that should be fixed on a normal patch cycle; fixed builds such as 10.0.19044.7807, 10.0.26100.9711 and 10.0.14393.9612 are not vulnerable.

RemediationAI

The primary fix is the vendor-released Microsoft security update; per the MSRC advisory at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-85927, apply the applicable cumulative update for each SKU to reach or exceed the fixed builds, including 10.0.14393.9612 (Server 2016 / Windows 10 1607), 10.0.17763.9376 (Server 2019 / Windows 10 1809), 10.0.19044.7807 (Windows 10 21H2/22H2), 10.0.22631.7652 (Windows 11 23H2), 10.0.26100.9711 (Windows 11 24H2) and 10.0.26100.33650 (Server 2025), 10.0.26200.9711 (Windows 11 25H2), 10.0.28000.3231 (Windows 11 26H1), 10.0.26300.9711 (Windows 11 26H2), 10.0.20348.5761 (Server 2022), 6.2.9200.26434 (Server 2012) and 6.3.9600.23470 (Server 2012 R2); deployment through Windows Update, WSUS, or Microsoft Update Catalog is appropriate, and legacy platforms such as Server 2012/2012 R2 may require ESU entitlement. Where immediate patching is not possible, the most effective compensating control is to stop and disable the UPnP Device Host service (upnphost) - and, if UPnP is not otherwise required, the associated SSDP Discovery service (SSDPSRV) - which removes the attack surface entirely but has the side effect of breaking UPnP device publication/discovery, network discovery and some media-streaming or IoT-style scenarios, and must be validated against application dependencies before wide rollout; restricting inbound and loopback reachability to UPnP endpoints (SSDP UDP 1900 and UPnP HTTP TCP 2869, typically on the UPnP host's loopback/interface addresses) reduces reachability but is only a partial control here, because the attacker profile is already local. Because exploitation requires an existing authenticated low-privilege foothold rather than remote or unauthenticated access, reducing the number of untrusted local interactive accounts and tightly controlling who can log on locally to the affected hosts meaningfully lowers exposure while patching proceeds; these mitigations are compensating measures only and should be removed once the fixed builds above are installed.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 20 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The root cause class is CWE-122, a heap-based buffer overflow, in the Windows Universal Plug and Play (UPnP) Device Host component. UPnP Device Host implements the device side of the UPnP stack: it advertises hosted devices and services, serves device and service description documents, and handles SOAP-style control and eventing traffic, typically interacting with SSDP Discovery (UDP 1900) and UPnP HTTP endpoints such as TCP 2869. The vulnerable code path processes attacker-supplied input in a service that runs with elevated privileges, and because the size handling on a heap allocation is not correctly validated, malformed input can overwrite adjacent heap structures and enable controlled memory corruption and subsequent code execution in the service's security context. The CVSS vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) and the independent assessment agree that this is a local privilege-escalation primitive rather than a remote one: the attacker must already hold an authenticated low-privilege session and be able to reach the UPnP Device Host functionality, but needs no user interaction and no race or unusual preconditions, hence AC:L. CISA's SSVC decision data records Exploitation: none, Automatable: no and Technical Impact: total, meaning the impact of a successful trigger is severe (full loss of confidentiality, integrity and availability on the host) but the barrier of an existing local foothold keeps aggregate risk below emergency tier. The component ships by default on the affected client and server SKUs enumerated in the EUVD data.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.8 HIGH
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.8 HIGH

Local heap overflow in a Windows service exploitable by an existing low-privileged user (AV:L/PR:L), no user interaction, yielding full SYSTEM compromise (C/I/A:H).

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:21 cve.org
HIGH 7.8

DescriptionCVE.org

Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Universal Plug and Play (UPnP) Device Host allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A heap-based buffer overflow in the Windows UPnP Device Host service allows a user who already has a local login on a Windows machine to escalate to system-level privileges, affecting the full supported Windows client and server estate including Server Core builds. Because exploitation requires an existing local foothold and no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, this is a serious but manageable privilege-escalation risk rather than an emergency. Leadership should care because a compromised standard user account - a common outcome of phishing - could be parlayed into full control of the host, and unmanaged or deferred patching across Windows 10, Windows 11, and Server 2012 through 2025 leaves that path open.

Business Impact: Medium
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 77% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
core Windows component across all supported client and server editions
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
Medium
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

39
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +39
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

A heap overflow occurs when a program writes data beyond the bounds of a buffer allocated in the heap memory region.

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2025-13315 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-13316 HIGH POC
8.2 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy