Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain high-privilege network access to DFS
  2. Delivery
    Send crafted DFS request
  3. Exploit
    Trigger heap buffer overflow in DFS
  4. Execution
    Execute arbitrary code on server
  5. Impact
    Full host compromise

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Heap buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to already hold high privileges (PR:H) on the target - effectively administrative or equivalent elevated access to the Windows Distributed File System (DFS) service - and network reachability to that DFS endpoint (AV:N). No user interaction is required (UI:N) and attack complexity is low (AC:L), so once the privilege prerequisite is satisfied the overflow can be triggered reliably by sending crafted DFS traffic. The principal limiting factors are the high-privilege requirement, which prevents unauthenticated or low-privileged attackers from exploiting it, and the need for the DFS role/service to be deployed and network-exposed; environments that do not run DFS, or that restrict network access to DFS servers, are not exposed. SSVC's Automatable:no confirms this is not suitable for mass automated exploitation.

Impact

Multiple signals converge on this being a genuine but not top-tier priority. The CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.2 (High) with vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N reflects network-reachable, low-complexity exploitation that nonetheless requires PR:H - high privileges - which substantially gates abuse. CISA's SSVC framework reinforces a measured posture: Exploitation is 'none' (no observed or public exploitation), Automatable is 'no' (not amenable to mass/wormable exploitation, consistent with the PR:H authentication barrier), while Technical Impact is 'total' (full C:H/I:H/A:H compromise if exploited). There is no EPSS score provided, no CISA KEV listing, and no indication of public POC code, so the real-world exploitation likelihood is currently low despite the severe potential impact. In short, this is a high-impact but hard-to-reach flaw: an attacker already holding elevated/administrative privileges on a network-facing DFS service could achieve code execution, but there is no evidence of opportunistic, unauthenticated, or automated exploitation. Priority should be driven by exposure of DFS servers and the attacker's existing foothold, not by fear of indiscriminate attacks. No conflicting signals were found between the CVSS vector and the description - both agree on network vector with required privileges.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has already obtained high-privilege (administrative-level) access to a network-reachable Windows DFS service sends specially crafted DFS protocol traffic that triggers a heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122) in the DFS component, corrupting heap memory to execute arbitrary code over the network. Because the vector is AV:N/AC:L with no user interaction, exploitation is straightforward once the privilege prerequisite is met, but the PR:H requirement means this is most realistic as a privilege-leverage or lateral-movement step rather than an initial breach. No public exploit identified at time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.9% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 13, 2026

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft's Windows Distributed File System (DFS) lets an attacker who already holds high privileges on the target send crafted network traffic to the DFS service and achieve code execution, with high impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The flaw, tracked as CWE-122, affects a broad set of Windows client and server releases-including Windows 10, Windows 11 23H2/24H2/25H2/26H1/26H2, Windows Server 2012 through 2025-and carries a CVSS of 7.2 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), meaning exploitation is reliable but gated behind a significant privilege prerequisite. There is confirmed no active exploitation per SSVC (Exploitation: none) and no public exploit identified at time of analysis; CISA's SSVC also rates it non-automatable, so mass scanning and worm-style spread are not expected. The practical risk is concentrated in environments where the DFS role is deployed and network-reachable and where an attacker has already obtained administrative-equivalent access, making this a post-compromise elevation/impact vector rather than an initial access path.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: Microsoft has published fixes for CVE-2026-85798 through the MSRC update guide (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-85798), and the EUVD-2026-99510 affected-version data gives the exact fixed build for each platform-apply Windows 10 1607 cumulative updates at or above 10.0.14393.9612, Windows 10 1809 and Server 2019 at or above 10.0.17763.9376, Windows 10 21H2/22H2 at or above 10.0.19044.7807, Windows 11 23H2 at or above 10.0.22631.7652, Windows 11 24H2 and Windows Server 2025 at or above 10.0.26100.9711 and 10.0.26100.33650 respectively, Windows 11 25H2 at or above 10.0.26200.9711, Windows 11 26H1 at or above 10.0.28000.3231, Windows 11 26H2 at or above 10.0.26300.9711, Windows Server 2022 at or above 10.0.20348.5761, Windows Server 2016 at or above 10.0.14393.9612, Server 2012 R2 at or above 6.3.9600.23470, and Server 2012 at or above 6.2.9200.26434. Because exploitation requires high privileges (PR:H) on the DFS host and network reachability to the DFS service, the most effective compensating controls are to restrict network access to DFS endpoints-segment DFS servers and limit SMB/RPC traffic to trusted management and replication subnets via host firewall and network ACLs-and to tighten the set of accounts holding administrative rights on DFS hosts, since removing that privilege prerequisite eliminates the practical attack path. Where DFS is not actually required, uninstalling or disabling the DFS Namespaces and DFS Replication roles removes the exposed attack surface entirely, at the cost of losing the unified namespace and replication functionality those deployments rely on; disabling DFS Replication but keeping Namespaces narrows exposure further. Given SSVC Exploitation:none and Automatable:no and no public exploit identified at time of analysis, patching can follow a risk-based cycle prioritizing internet-facing and multi-tenant DFS servers rather than emergency out-of-band deployment, but the fix should still be tracked to completion because the technical impact of successful exploitation is total (code execution with high C/I/A impact).

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 20 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability is a heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122) in the Windows Distributed File System (DFS), Microsoft's set of services-DFS Namespaces and DFS Replication-that presents a unified, location-transparent namespace across file servers and replicates content between them over SMB/RPC-based protocols. A heap overflow occurs when the service allocates a buffer for incoming DFS request data and then writes more data than that allocation can hold, corrupting adjacent heap metadata; with sufficient control over the crafted payload, an attacker can turn the corruption into arbitrary code execution in the context of the DFS service. The CPE-derived affected set spans essentially the entire current Windows fleet: Windows 10 1607/1809/21H2/22H2 (10.0.14393, 10.0.17763, 10.0.19044/19045), Windows 11 23H2 (10.0.22631), 24H2 (10.0.26100), 25H2 (10.0.26200), 26H1 (10.0.28000) and 26H2 (10.0.26300), plus Windows Server 2012/2012 R2, 2016, 2019, 2022 and 2025 including Server Core installations. The assessed CVSS vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H confirms the overflow is reachable over the network with low complexity and no user interaction, but requires PR:H-attackers must already hold administrative or equivalent elevated rights on the DFS host. That combination places the flaw in the class of post-authentication service overflows: the code-execution primitives are strong, but the privilege prerequisite materially constrains who can pull the trigger. SSVC's Exploitation:none and Automatable:no reinforce that no exploit chain exists in the wild and the bug is not well suited to broad, automated campaigns.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.2 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.2 HIGH

Network-triggerable heap overflow needing elevated privileges on the DFS service justifies AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N, with full code execution yielding C:H/I:H/A:H and unchanged scope.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:21 cve.org
HIGH 7.2

DescriptionCVE.org

Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Distributed File System (DFS) allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Microsoft's Windows Distributed File System (DFS) service - deployed on Windows 10 and Windows 11 endpoints and across Windows Server 2012 through 2025 - contains a heap buffer overflow that lets an attacker who has already obtained administrative rights on a host run arbitrary code with full impact to data confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Since the flaw can only be reached by someone who has already compromised a highly privileged account, the practical exposure sits with organizations running DFS Namespaces or DFS Replication on network-reachable servers, where a single admin-level foothold could be converted into broader control over file services and dependent business workflows. No exploitation has been observed and no public exploit code exists, so leadership should treat this as a scheduled, patchable hardening obligation rather than an emergency.

Business Impact: Medium
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.9%
Top 42% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
DFS ships across all supported Windows Server and client editions
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.9%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
Medium
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

37
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +36
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

A heap overflow occurs when a program writes data beyond the bounds of a buffer allocated in the heap memory region.

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2025-13315 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-13316 HIGH POC
8.2 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy