Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain high-privilege network access to DFS
-
DeliverySend crafted DFS request
-
ExploitTrigger heap buffer overflow in DFS
-
ExecutionExecute arbitrary code on server
-
ImpactFull host compromise
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Heap buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to already hold high privileges (PR:H) on the target - effectively administrative or equivalent elevated access to the Windows Distributed File System (DFS) service - and network reachability to that DFS endpoint (AV:N). No user interaction is required (UI:N) and attack complexity is low (AC:L), so once the privilege prerequisite is satisfied the overflow can be triggered reliably by sending crafted DFS traffic. The principal limiting factors are the high-privilege requirement, which prevents unauthenticated or low-privileged attackers from exploiting it, and the need for the DFS role/service to be deployed and network-exposed; environments that do not run DFS, or that restrict network access to DFS servers, are not exposed. SSVC's Automatable:no confirms this is not suitable for mass automated exploitation. |
| Impact | Multiple signals converge on this being a genuine but not top-tier priority. The CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.2 (High) with vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N reflects network-reachable, low-complexity exploitation that nonetheless requires PR:H - high privileges - which substantially gates abuse. CISA's SSVC framework reinforces a measured posture: Exploitation is 'none' (no observed or public exploitation), Automatable is 'no' (not amenable to mass/wormable exploitation, consistent with the PR:H authentication barrier), while Technical Impact is 'total' (full C:H/I:H/A:H compromise if exploited). There is no EPSS score provided, no CISA KEV listing, and no indication of public POC code, so the real-world exploitation likelihood is currently low despite the severe potential impact. In short, this is a high-impact but hard-to-reach flaw: an attacker already holding elevated/administrative privileges on a network-facing DFS service could achieve code execution, but there is no evidence of opportunistic, unauthenticated, or automated exploitation. Priority should be driven by exposure of DFS servers and the attacker's existing foothold, not by fear of indiscriminate attacks. No conflicting signals were found between the CVSS vector and the description - both agree on network vector with required privileges. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who has already obtained high-privilege (administrative-level) access to a network-reachable Windows DFS service sends specially crafted DFS protocol traffic that triggers a heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122) in the DFS component, corrupting heap memory to execute arbitrary code over the network. Because the vector is AV:N/AC:L with no user interaction, exploitation is straightforward once the privilege prerequisite is met, but the PR:H requirement means this is most realistic as a privilege-leverage or lateral-movement step rather than an initial breach. No public exploit identified at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 13, 2026
Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft's Windows Distributed File System (DFS) lets an attacker who already holds high privileges on the target send crafted network traffic to the DFS service and achieve code execution, with high impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The flaw, tracked as CWE-122, affects a broad set of Windows client and server releases-including Windows 10, Windows 11 23H2/24H2/25H2/26H1/26H2, Windows Server 2012 through 2025-and carries a CVSS of 7.2 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), meaning exploitation is reliable but gated behind a significant privilege prerequisite. There is confirmed no active exploitation per SSVC (Exploitation: none) and no public exploit identified at time of analysis; CISA's SSVC also rates it non-automatable, so mass scanning and worm-style spread are not expected. The practical risk is concentrated in environments where the DFS role is deployed and network-reachable and where an attacker has already obtained administrative-equivalent access, making this a post-compromise elevation/impact vector rather than an initial access path.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: Microsoft has published fixes for CVE-2026-85798 through the MSRC update guide (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-85798), and the EUVD-2026-99510 affected-version data gives the exact fixed build for each platform-apply Windows 10 1607 cumulative updates at or above 10.0.14393.9612, Windows 10 1809 and Server 2019 at or above 10.0.17763.9376, Windows 10 21H2/22H2 at or above 10.0.19044.7807, Windows 11 23H2 at or above 10.0.22631.7652, Windows 11 24H2 and Windows Server 2025 at or above 10.0.26100.9711 and 10.0.26100.33650 respectively, Windows 11 25H2 at or above 10.0.26200.9711, Windows 11 26H1 at or above 10.0.28000.3231, Windows 11 26H2 at or above 10.0.26300.9711, Windows Server 2022 at or above 10.0.20348.5761, Windows Server 2016 at or above 10.0.14393.9612, Server 2012 R2 at or above 6.3.9600.23470, and Server 2012 at or above 6.2.9200.26434. Because exploitation requires high privileges (PR:H) on the DFS host and network reachability to the DFS service, the most effective compensating controls are to restrict network access to DFS endpoints-segment DFS servers and limit SMB/RPC traffic to trusted management and replication subnets via host firewall and network ACLs-and to tighten the set of accounts holding administrative rights on DFS hosts, since removing that privilege prerequisite eliminates the practical attack path. Where DFS is not actually required, uninstalling or disabling the DFS Namespaces and DFS Replication roles removes the exposed attack surface entirely, at the cost of losing the unified namespace and replication functionality those deployments rely on; disabling DFS Replication but keeping Namespaces narrows exposure further. Given SSVC Exploitation:none and Automatable:no and no public exploit identified at time of analysis, patching can follow a risk-based cycle prioritizing internet-facing and multi-tenant DFS servers rather than emergency out-of-band deployment, but the fix should still be tracked to completion because the technical impact of successful exploitation is total (code execution with high C/I/A impact).
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 20 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The vulnerability is a heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122) in the Windows Distributed File System (DFS), Microsoft's set of services-DFS Namespaces and DFS Replication-that presents a unified, location-transparent namespace across file servers and replicates content between them over SMB/RPC-based protocols. A heap overflow occurs when the service allocates a buffer for incoming DFS request data and then writes more data than that allocation can hold, corrupting adjacent heap metadata; with sufficient control over the crafted payload, an attacker can turn the corruption into arbitrary code execution in the context of the DFS service. The CPE-derived affected set spans essentially the entire current Windows fleet: Windows 10 1607/1809/21H2/22H2 (10.0.14393, 10.0.17763, 10.0.19044/19045), Windows 11 23H2 (10.0.22631), 24H2 (10.0.26100), 25H2 (10.0.26200), 26H1 (10.0.28000) and 26H2 (10.0.26300), plus Windows Server 2012/2012 R2, 2016, 2019, 2022 and 2025 including Server Core installations. The assessed CVSS vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H confirms the overflow is reachable over the network with low complexity and no user interaction, but requires PR:H-attackers must already hold administrative or equivalent elevated rights on the DFS host. That combination places the flaw in the class of post-authentication service overflows: the code-execution primitives are strong, but the privilege prerequisite materially constrains who can pull the trigger. SSVC's Exploitation:none and Automatable:no reinforce that no exploit chain exists in the wild and the bug is not well suited to broad, automated campaigns.
Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Network-triggerable heap overflow needing elevated privileges on the DFS service justifies AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N, with full code execution yielding C:H/I:H/A:H and unchanged scope.
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Distributed File System (DFS) allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Executive ViewAI
Microsoft's Windows Distributed File System (DFS) service - deployed on Windows 10 and Windows 11 endpoints and across Windows Server 2012 through 2025 - contains a heap buffer overflow that lets an attacker who has already obtained administrative rights on a host run arbitrary code with full impact to data confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Since the flaw can only be reached by someone who has already compromised a highly privileged account, the practical exposure sits with organizations running DFS Namespaces or DFS Replication on network-reachable servers, where a single admin-level foothold could be converted into broader control over file services and dependent business workflows. No exploitation has been observed and no public exploit code exists, so leadership should treat this as a scheduled, patchable hardening obligation rather than an emergency.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.
A heap overflow occurs when a program writes data beyond the bounds of a buffer allocated in the heap memory region.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio
Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in
A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr
Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables
Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker
Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b
An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote
FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit
Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio
Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred
Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/
React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo
EUVD-2026-99510
GHSA-c2j3-77p6-q6hj
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB