Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privileged local access
  2. Delivery
    Craft malicious EFS request
  3. Exploit
    Trigger heap buffer overflow in EFS
  4. Execution
    Groom heap to control corruption
  5. Impact
    Execute code / elevate to SYSTEM

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Heap buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to already hold valid low-privileged authenticated access to the target Windows system (PR:L) and local code-execution capability (AV:L) - there is no remote or network-facing path. The vulnerable component is the Encrypting File System (EFS), present by default in supported Windows client and server editions, so no non-default feature toggle is implied by the description. The principal limiting factor is high attack complexity (AC:H): reliably triggering and weaponizing the heap-based buffer overflow requires defeating heap/allocator state (grooming or race conditions), which constrains dependable exploitation. No user interaction is required (UI:N).

Impact

This is a genuine but second-tier priority - a serious flaw that is unlikely to see mass exploitation. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 7.0 HIGH) is internally consistent with the description: local attack vector matches 'elevate privileges locally', PR:L matches 'authorized attacker' (a user who already has a foothold), and full C/I/H/A impact matches a successful privilege escalation to SYSTEM. The key risk-dampening signal is AC:H - exploiting a heap overflow in EFS reliably typically requires defeating heap mitigations or winning a race/grooming the allocator, which lowers real-world weaponization likelihood. No EPSS score was provided in the input, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified. The CVE is NOT in CISA KEV and no POC is referenced, so there is no evidence of active exploitation - this is a post-authentication local EoP, not a remotely wormable bug. SSVC framing: exploitation status = none observed, automatable = no (local access plus high complexity), technical impact = total. Net: patch on a normal prioritized cadence for a privilege-escalation bug, ahead of low-impact issues but behind any network-reachable or actively-exploited item.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who already has low-privileged authenticated access to a Windows host (e.g., via phishing, stolen credentials, or an initial-access exploit) runs a crafted program that triggers the heap-based buffer overflow in the Encrypting File System (EFS) component. By carefully grooming the kernel/EFS heap to control the overflow, they corrupt adjacent structures to execute code or escalate to SYSTEM. No public POC is referenced in the input, and the high attack complexity (AC:H) means reliable exploitation requires non-trivial heap manipulation.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 13, 2026

Local privilege escalation in the Microsoft Windows Encrypting File System (EFS) allows an authenticated attacker who already has low-privileged code execution on a host to trigger a heap-based buffer overflow and escalate to full system rights. The flaw (CWE-122) carries a 7.0 CVSS score with high attack complexity, because dependable exploitation requires defeating heap allocator state rather than a simple one-shot trigger; the vector AV:L/PR:L/UI:N confirms there is no remote or network-facing path and authentication at a low privilege level is required. Microsoft has released vendor patches, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis - this is a genuine but second-tier priority: a serious flaw that is unlikely to see mass exploitation.

RemediationAI

Patch available per vendor advisory: apply the Microsoft security update documented at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-85791, bringing each SKU at or above the fixed build thresholds identified in the affected-version data - for example 10.0.19044.7807 (Windows 10 21H2/22H2), 10.0.14393.9612 (Windows 10 1607 and Server 2016), 10.0.17763.9376 (Windows 10 1809 and Server 2019), 10.0.20348.5761 (Server 2022), 10.0.22631.7652 (Windows 11 23H2), 10.0.26100.9711 (Windows 11 24H2), 10.0.26100.33650 (Server 2025), 10.0.26200.9711 (25H2), 10.0.28000.3231 (26H1), 10.0.26300.9711 (26H2), 6.2.9200.26434 (Server 2012) and 6.3.9600.23470 (Server 2012 R2), and install the latest cumulative update for any SKU already past those baselines. Because this is a kernel-resident component, the update requires a reboot; schedule the maintenance window accordingly, and prioritize multi-user, RDP-exposed and shared-workstation hosts where low-privileged local accounts and untrusted code execution are common. Where patching cannot be immediate, the most effective compensating control is to shrink the local code-execution surface that AV:L/PR:L requires - enforce WDAC or AppLocker to block untrusted binaries and scripts (trade-off: may block legitimate unsigned or line-of-business software and requires careful allowlisting to avoid operational breakage), and reduce the number of accounts permitted local interactive logon or local administrator rights. EFS itself can be deactivated to remove the attack path: set the Group Policy or registry value NtfsDisableEncryption=1 under HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\FileSystem to prevent new EFS operations, or stop and disable the Encrypting File System (EFS) service (trade-off: users lose the ability to encrypt files and certificate-based key management stops working, and note that neither setting removes the vulnerable kernel code or decrypts existing ciphertext, so already-encrypted data may become inaccessible or require re-enabling the service to read). Monitoring for abnormal EFS API activity (EncryptFile, OpenEncryptedFileRaw) and for unexpected elevation to SYSTEM should be used to detect exploitation attempts in the interim.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 20 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Encrypting File System (EFS) is the native NTFS-based file encryption feature in Microsoft Windows, implemented predominantly in kernel-mode components (efs.sys / efscore.sys) with supporting user-mode functionality in the EFS service and Win32 APIs such as EncryptFile, DecryptFile and OpenEncryptedFileRaw; it manages per-file File Encryption Keys protected by user certificates and Data Recovery Agent keys. The root cause is a heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122): the vulnerable routine mishandles buffer sizing or bounds when processing attacker-influenced data, so a write overruns the allocated heap block and corrupts adjacent heap metadata or objects. The CVSS vector AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H and the independent assessment make clear that exploitation requires existing local, low-privileged authenticated access and local code-execution capability, and that the limiting factor is high attack complexity - the attacker must groom or race the heap to place useful data around the corrupted block and convert memory corruption into controlled execution in a SYSTEM context (integrity and availability impacts are both High, with no scope change). The affected component ships by default in supported Windows client and server editions, so no non-default feature toggle is implied.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.0 HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.0 HIGH

Local-only privilege escalation by an already-authenticated user gives AV:L and PR:L; heap grooming for a reliable overflow justifies AC:H; successful EoP yields full C/I/A impact.

3.1 AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:21 cve.org
HIGH 7.0

DescriptionCVE.org

Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Encrypting File System (EFS) allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A local privilege escalation flaw in Microsoft Windows Encrypting File System (EFS) means an attacker who already has a foothold on a Windows host could elevate to system-level control, putting encrypted data and downstream systems at risk. Exploitation requires authenticated local access with low privileges and is technically complex, and at this time no public exploit identified at time of analysis, so this is a serious but second-tier patching priority. Leadership should care because successful exploitation could enable unauthorized access to encrypted files, credential theft, and lateral movement from affected endpoints or servers.

Business Impact: Medium
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 80% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Core Windows OS component across all supported client and server editions
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation More Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
Medium
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

35
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +35
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

A heap overflow occurs when a program writes data beyond the bounds of a buffer allocated in the heap memory region.

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2025-13315 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-13316 HIGH POC
8.2 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy