Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain low-privileged local access
-
DeliveryRun crafted Group Policy call
-
ExploitTrigger heap buffer overflow (CWE-122)
-
ExecutionCorrupt heap and hijack execution
-
ImpactElevate to SYSTEM privileges
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Heap buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to already have local, low-privileged authenticated access to the target Windows system (PR:L) and the ability to execute code locally that invokes the vulnerable Windows Group Policy processing path; the overflow is then triggered to escalate privileges. Limiting factors: there is no remote vector (AV:L means network exploitation is not possible), the attacker must first establish a foothold, and the host must be running an unpatched build within the affected ranges (e.g., Windows 10/11 and Windows Server 2012 through 2025 below the fixed revisions listed in EUVD). No user interaction is required (UI:N), and SSVC marks the flaw as not automatable, so it is unlikely to be used for self-propagating or mass exploitation. |
| Impact | This is a credible but not emergency-tier priority. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N) describes a local elevation-of-privilege flaw that requires an attacker to already have low-level authenticated access to the host and offers total technical impact (C:H/I:H/A:H), consistent with the SSVC 'Technical Impact: total' rating. Several signals, however, temper the urgency: CISA's SSVC framework records Exploitation as 'none' and Automatable as 'no', the CVE is NOT on CISA KEV, no public proof-of-concept is identified in the provided data, and no EPSS score was supplied. These signals are mutually consistent - a local-only EoP that is not automatable and not yet exploited is a classic 'patch in normal cadence' issue rather than a drop-everything scenario. The primary risk is as a post-compromise privilege-escalation building block (e.g., following phishing or an initial foothold) rather than a remotely wormable threat. Note: no EPSS probability was provided, so quantitative exploitation likelihood cannot be stated; absence of a POC is not proof one does not exist privately. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who has already obtained low-privileged authenticated access to a Windows host (for example via phishing or stolen credentials) runs a crafted local program that triggers the heap-based buffer overflow in the Group Policy component to corrupt heap memory and gain SYSTEM-level privileges. Because the CVSS vector is AV:L/AC:L, no network reach or user interaction is needed, but local code execution is a prerequisite. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, so weaponization would require independent exploit development. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026
Local privilege escalation in Windows Group Policy lets an authenticated, low-privileged user on an unpatched Windows host overflow heap memory and escalate to SYSTEM-level code execution. The defect is a heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122) reachable only after the attacker already holds a local foothold - there is no remote vector (AV:L), no user interaction is required (UI:N), and successful exploitation yields full loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability for the host. No confirmed active exploitation (not in CISA KEV) and no public exploit code identified at time of analysis; CISA's SSVC assessment marks the flaw as non-automatable, making it a credible but not emergency-tier patching priority.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: Microsoft has published fixes for this CVE; apply the latest cumulative security update for your branch so the build reaches or exceeds the fixed revisions listed in the EUVD data - for example 10.0.14393.9612 (Windows 10 1607 / Server 2016), 10.0.17763.9376 (Windows 10 1809 / Server 2019), 10.0.19044.7807 (Windows 10 21H2/22H2), 10.0.22631.7652 (Windows 11 23H2), 10.0.26100.9711 (Windows 11 24H2), 10.0.26200.9711 (Windows 11 25H2), 6.2.9200.26434 (Server 2012), 6.3.9600.23470 (Server 2012 R2), 10.0.20348.5761 (Server 2022), and 10.0.26100.33650 (Server 2025); confirm exact packages against https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-83932 before deployment. Because exploitation is local and requires an existing low-privileged foothold, the effective compensating controls are those that remove or contain that foothold: enforce least privilege and remove unnecessary local interactive logon rights (RDP/local console) for non-administrative accounts, which directly raises the bar for PR:L but can disrupt legitimate helpdesk or shared-workstation workflows; deploy WDAC or AppLocker allowlisting to block untrusted binaries that drive Group Policy processing paths, with the trade-off of ongoing policy maintenance and possible blocking of legitimate line-of-business tools; and monitor for anomalous elevation events, unexpected Group Policy refresh activity from non-administrative contexts, and crash telemetry in Group Policy components as a detection signal. Privileged-access workstations and jump hosts should be patched first since a compromise there yields disproportionate downstream impact. No vendor-documented workaround beyond patching was identified, and no public exploit code is known at this time.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 20 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The vulnerability is a heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122) in Windows Group Policy processing, tracked as EUVD-2026-99443 and reported by Microsoft's own security team (secure@microsoft.com). CWE-122 describes a write beyond the bounds of a heap-allocated buffer, which typically corrupts adjacent heap metadata or object pointers and can be shaped into controlled code execution in the context of the vulnerable process - here the Windows Group Policy component that runs with elevated privileges. The CVSS 3.1 vector AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H confirms the attack surface: it is local-only, requires low privileges and no user interaction, and does not cross a security scope boundary, meaning the attacker must already be able to execute code on the box and then use the overflow to move from a standard user to SYSTEM. Because the flaw lives in a core OS service rather than a network-facing daemon, the practical exploitation path is a local binary or script that drives the Group Policy processing path with crafted input. Affected builds span the modern Windows line - Windows 10 (1607, 1809, 21H2, 22H2), Windows 11 (23H2, 24H2, 25H2, 26H1, 26H2), and Windows Server 2012, 2012 R2, 2016, 2019, 2022, and 2025, including their Server Core installation variants - so mitigation requires build-level patching across a very wide fleet.
Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Local-only EoP needing prior low-privileged access (AV:L/PR:L), no user interaction, and a heap overflow yielding full SYSTEM control gives C:H/I:H/A:H.
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Group Policy allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Executive ViewAI
A local privilege escalation vulnerability in Windows Group Policy (CVE-2026-83932) could allow an attacker with the ability to execute code on a Windows host to gain SYSTEM-level control, resulting in full compromise of that system's confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Although no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, the high severity and potential for significant impact on affected hosts make timely patching a priority. Leadership should ensure that unpatched Windows systems are remediated to prevent an attacker from escalating privileges after an initial foothold.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.
A heap overflow occurs when a program writes data beyond the bounds of a buffer allocated in the heap memory region.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio
Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in
A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr
Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables
Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker
Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b
An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote
FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit
Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio
Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred
Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/
React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo
EUVD-2026-99443
GHSA-2f7w-93g2-jfc8
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB