Skip to main content

Windows Storage EUVDEUVD-2026-99427

| CVE-2026-83911 HIGH
Heap-based Buffer Overflow (CWE-122)
2026-10-13 secure@microsoft.com GHSA-9pvq-4h2c-4q2m
7.0
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: microsoft
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privileged local session
  2. Delivery
    Invoke vulnerable Windows Storage code path
  3. Exploit
    Win race / groom heap (AC:H)
  4. Execution
    Trigger heap buffer overflow (CWE-122)
  5. Persist
    Execute code as SYSTEM
  6. Impact
    Full host compromise

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Heap buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires the attacker to already hold an authenticated low-privileged local account on the target Windows host (PR:L, AV:L - not remotely reachable). Exploitation is further limited by high attack complexity (AC:H): the heap-based buffer overflow in the Windows Storage component must be triggered under a specific condition (consistent with a race or precise heap state) rather than on demand, so reliable exploitation is non-trivial. No user interaction is needed (UI:N) and no special non-default configuration is called out in the description - the Windows Storage component is present by default. Realistic risk is highest on shared/multi-user systems (terminal servers, jump boxes) where low-privileged footholds are common.

Impact

This is a genuine but second-tier priority. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N) describes a local privilege-escalation flaw that requires the attacker to already have an authenticated foothold (PR:L) and to win a high-complexity condition (AC:H), which for a heap overflow of this class typically means a timing/race or specific heap-grooming requirement rather than a deterministic trigger. The impact is total (C:H/I:H/A:H, SSVC Technical Impact: total), consistent with SYSTEM-level compromise once exploited. However, every exploitation signal points to low immediacy: CISA SSVC lists Exploitation: none and Automatable: no, there is no CISA KEV listing, and no public exploit or POC is referenced in the input - so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. No EPSS score was provided, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood cannot be factored in (MISSING). The signals are internally consistent rather than conflicting: a high-impact-but-hard-to-exploit local EoP that currently shows no exploitation. It should be patched as part of normal Patch Tuesday cadence and prioritized on multi-user or shared Windows hosts, but it is not a drop-everything network-facing emergency.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who already has a low-privileged authenticated session on a Windows host (e.g., via phishing, a stolen credential, or a low-priv service account) runs a crafted program that drives the vulnerable Windows Storage component into a heap-based buffer overflow, winning the required race/complexity condition to corrupt heap memory and execute code at SYSTEM. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, and the high attack complexity means exploitation is not point-and-click.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026

Heap-based buffer overflow in the Windows Storage component allows an authenticated, low-privileged local user to elevate privileges to kernel-level code execution across a wide range of supported Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server builds. Exploitation is constrained by high attack complexity - the overflow must be triggered under a specific, non-trivial condition (consistent with a race or a precisely groomed heap state) rather than on demand - and it requires the attacker to already hold a local account on the target host, making shared multi-user systems such as terminal servers, VDI hosts, and jump boxes the most realistic risk scenario. Microsoft has released fixes, and no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis; CISA's SSVC assessment records no exploitation and classifies the issue as not automatable, though technical impact is total once triggered (C:H/I:H/A:H).

RemediationAI

Patch status is positive: fixes are available from the vendor, so the primary action is to apply the current Microsoft cumulative update that brings each host to or above the fixed build for its branch - 10.0.14393.9612 (Windows 10 1607 / Server 2016), 10.0.17763.9376 (Windows 10 1809 / Server 2019), 10.0.19044.7807 (Windows 10 21H2 and 22H2), 10.0.22631.7652 (Windows 11 23H2), 10.0.26100.9711 (Windows 11 24H2), 10.0.26200.9711 (Windows 11 25H2), 10.0.28000.3231 (Windows 11 26H1), 10.0.26300.9711 (Windows 11 26H2), 10.0.20348.5761 (Server 2022), 10.0.26100.33650 (Server 2025), 6.2.9200.26434 (Server 2012), and 6.3.9600.23470 (Server 2012 R2) - using the Microsoft Update Guide at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-83911 as the authoritative source; note that any host still below its listed build, including the out-of-mainstream-support Server 2012/2012 R2 branches, remains vulnerable and those platforms may require an ESU entitlement or priority migration. Because the issue is a local privilege escalation with an AC:H trigger and no known exploit, patching can be prioritized after internet-facing issues, but should not be deferred indefinitely on multi-user hosts. Where immediate patching is not possible, the most effective compensating control is to reduce the number of low-privileged local interactive sessions that can reach the storage stack: restrict interactive logon and RDP access to shared hosts (terminal servers, jump boxes, VDI pools) to trusted administrators, remove standing local accounts and enforce just-in-time elevation - the trade-off is reduced operational flexibility for helpdesk and multi-tenant workloads. Enforcing least privilege and removing unnecessary local administrative tooling raises the cost of turning a corrupted heap into SYSTEM, though it does not eliminate the underlying overflow. Additional hardening with measurable trade-offs includes enabling Microsoft Defender and ASR rules plus WDAC/AppLocker to block unsigned code that would consume a corrupted heap (potential application-compatibility impact), and monitoring for unexpected storage-driver crashes, bugchecks (e.g., pool-corruption stop codes), or anomalous elevation events on hosts where low-privileged users are common. Disabling or removing the Windows Storage component is not a viable mitigation because it is part of the default kernel storage path and would break normal disk and volume operation.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 20 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw is a CWE-122 heap-based buffer overflow in the Windows Storage component, the kernel-mode storage stack that handles device and volume I/O for Windows. A heap buffer is written past its allocated bounds, corrupting adjacent heap metadata or objects in kernel pool memory; because the storage stack runs with kernel privileges, successful corruption can be steered into controlled execution in ring 0 and a full SYSTEM-level compromise (integrity, confidentiality, and availability all rated High with scope unchanged). The CVSS vector CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H confirms the attack surface is strictly local (AV:L) and gated behind an existing low-privileged account (PR:L), with no user interaction beyond the attacker's own actions (UI:N). The high attack-complexity rating (AC:H) indicates the corruption is not reliably reachable on demand: the trigger depends on a specific heap layout or timing window, which is typical of pool-spray/grooming scenarios and means a would-be exploiter must first win a reliability problem before gaining elevation. The Windows Storage component is present by default, and the description calls out no non-default configuration prerequisite; EUVD tracks this as EUVD-2026-99427 with affected build ranges spanning Windows 10 1607 through 22H2, Windows 11 23H2 through 26H2, and Windows Server 2012 through 2025 including Server Core installations, from the legacy 6.2.9200/6.3.9600 branches up to the 10.0.26100/26200/26300 builds.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.0 HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.0 HIGH

Local-only EoP (AV:L) by an authenticated low-priv user (PR:L) winning a non-deterministic heap condition (AC:H), yielding SYSTEM-level total impact (C/I/A:H), no scope change.

3.1 AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:20 cve.org
HIGH 7.0

DescriptionCVE.org

Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Storage allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A high-severity flaw in the Windows Storage component lets someone who already has an ordinary user account on a machine escalate to full control of the underlying operating system, and Microsoft has issued fixes across Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server. The practical exposure is concentrated on shared, multi-user environments - terminal servers, VDI hosts, and jump boxes - where many users legitimately hold local accounts but should never reach kernel-level privileges. Because successful exploitation yields complete loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability on the affected host, leadership should treat this as a containment and patching priority for those shared platforms rather than fleet-wide emergency work.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch. Until it is deployed, reduce the attack surface by minimizing the number of local accounts on shared Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server hosts (terminal servers, VDI, jump boxes), restricting interactive logon rights, isolating those systems from untrusted users, and monitoring for unusual privilege-escalation activity.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 82% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Core Windows OS component present on virtually all Windows client and server installs
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

35
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +35
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

A heap overflow occurs when a program writes data beyond the bounds of a buffer allocated in the heap memory region.

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2025-13315 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-13316 HIGH POC
8.2 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy