Skip to main content

Windows OLE EUVDEUVD-2026-99143

| CVE-2026-70059 HIGH
Heap-based Buffer Overflow (CWE-122)
2026-10-13 secure@microsoft.com GHSA-472p-rg7m-gwg9
7.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: microsoft
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privileged local access
  2. Exploit
    Craft malicious OLE object
  3. Execution
    Trigger heap buffer overflow in Windows OLE
  4. Impact
    Execute code at elevated privilege

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Heap buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to already have local, authenticated access to the target Windows system (PR:L) and the ability to run or supply a crafted OLE object to the vulnerable Windows OLE component; the overflow is in the heap-based OLE object handling. Limiting factors that reduce real-world risk: it is local-only (no remote or network vector), it requires an existing low-privilege account or code-execution foothold, and SSVC rates it non-automatable, meaning it does not lend itself to scripted mass exploitation. It is not remotely reachable and cannot be triggered against a default configuration from outside the host.

Impact

This is a credible but not emergency-level priority. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N) describes a local privilege-escalation flaw requiring an attacker to already hold low-level authenticated access to the host, with low complexity and no user interaction once that foothold exists; impact is total (C:H/I:H/A:H), consistent with the SSVC 'Technical Impact: total' rating. However, multiple signals argue against treating it as a top-of-queue item in isolation: CISA's SSVC framework reports Exploitation: none and Automatable: no, there is no CISA KEV listing, and no public exploit has been identified. EPSS is not provided in the input, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified here. The signals are internally consistent - a locally-exploitable, non-automatable EoP with high impact but no evidence of active use - so there is no contradiction to flag between the CVSS vector and the description (both agree on local access). The realistic framing is a post-compromise escalation primitive: dangerous when chained after initial access on an endpoint, but not a remote, wormable, or mass-exploitation threat on its own.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has already gained a low-privileged foothold on a Windows host (e.g., via phishing, a standard user account, or another bug) runs a program that passes a crafted OLE object to the vulnerable component, triggering a heap-based buffer overflow. Successful exploitation corrupts heap memory to execute attacker-controlled code at elevated privilege, converting limited access into full control of the system. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, and user interaction is not required once the attacker can execute code locally.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026

Local privilege escalation in Microsoft Windows OLE allows an authenticated attacker who already holds a low-privileged foothold on a host to corrupt heap memory through crafted OLE object handling and execute code at a higher integrity level, matching the assessed CVSS:3.1 vector AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H (7.8). Scope is limited to unpatched Windows 10, Windows 11 and Windows Server 2012 through 2025 builds listed by EUVD; because the vector is local-only with PR:L, the flaw is not remotely reachable and cannot be triggered against a default configuration by an outside party. CISA SSVC rates exploitation as "none" and automatable as "no", there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and Microsoft has shipped fixes via its Update Guide, making this a credible but not emergency-level priority.

RemediationAI

Microsoft has released fixes for this flaw, so the primary action is to apply the current cumulative security update for each affected branch through Windows Update, WSUS, or the Microsoft Update Catalog as directed by the MSRC advisory at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-70059; per EUVD the remediated build levels include 10.0.14393.9612 for Windows 10 1607 and Server 2016, 10.0.17763.9376 for Windows 10 1809 and Server 2019, 10.0.19044.7807 for Windows 10 21H2/22H2, 10.0.20348.5761 for Server 2022, 10.0.22631.7652 for Windows 11 23H2, 10.0.26100.9711 and 10.0.26100.33650 for Windows 11 24H2 and Server 2025 respectively, 10.0.26200.9711 for Windows 11 25H2, 10.0.28000.3231 for Windows 11 26H1, 10.0.26300.9711 for Windows 11 26H2, 6.2.9200.26434 for Server 2012 and 6.3.9600.23470 for Server 2012 R2. Where patching must be staged, note that this is a local-only PR:L issue, so the highest-value compensating controls are reducing the population of low-privileged local accounts that can run untrusted code on the host and shrinking the OLE attack surface: enforce least privilege so interactive users are not local administrators, restrict who may log on locally to servers, and use application control or Windows Defender Attack Surface Reduction rules (for example the rules that block Office applications from creating child processes and from injecting code) to stop low-privileged processes from loading crafted documents that carry embedded OLE objects; these controls carry a real trade-off because they break legitimate embedded-object and macro-driven business workflows, and ASR rules must be run in audit mode first to size the impact. Blocking or disabling OLE object activation broadly (for example neutering the OLE/COM package and embedded-object handlers on servers that never need them) removes the trigger entirely but will break document embedding, thumbnail generation and some line-of-business applications, so it should be limited to hardened server roles and terminal/VDI images that do not require it. Because heap corruption may manifest as crashes, enable crash-dump collection and monitor Windows Error Reporting and Microsoft-Windows-OLE/COM event channels for suspicious OLE-related faults as a detection backstop; as no public exploit code or active exploitation is known at time of analysis, none of these workarounds should delay normal monthly patch deployment.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 20 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

OLE (Object Linking and Embedding) is the long-standing COM-based Windows technology used to embed and link compound documents and structured-storage objects inside other applications; its object parsing and marshalling code runs inside privileged processes and is therefore a classic local elevation-of-privilege target. The root-cause class here is CWE-122, a heap-based buffer overflow: a buffer allocated on the heap is written past its end, typically because a size, count or offset field carried in a crafted OLE object is trusted without adequate bounds validation before a copy or serialization operation. The assessed vector AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N confirms the attack is local, low-complexity, requires an existing low-privileged account and no user interaction, while S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H indicates that successful exploitation stays within the same security authority but yields high confidentiality, integrity and availability impact to that host. EUVD tracks the issue as EUVD-2026-99143 and reports it across a broad set of Windows 10, Windows 11 and Windows Server branches, including Server Core installations, indicating the vulnerable OLE component is shared across the modern Windows code base rather than isolated to one SKU. No CPE identifiers or CWE-122-specific implementation details were supplied beyond the EUVD build ranges.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.8 HIGH
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.8 HIGH

Local-only privilege escalation by an already-authenticated low-privileged user (AV:L, PR:L, UI:N), no scope change, with full code-execution impact yielding C:H/I:H/A:H.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:19 cve.org
HIGH 7.8

DescriptionCVE.org

Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows OLE allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Microsoft Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server 2012 through 2025 contain a local privilege escalation flaw in the OLE component that allows an attacker who already holds a low-privileged account on a host to elevate to a higher integrity level and run code with the victim system's full privileges. Because the flaw is local-only and cannot be reached remotely, and no public exploit code or active exploitation has been identified, the immediate risk is concentrated in environments where an adversary has already gained a foothold - but successful elevation would hand that attacker complete control of the machine, enabling credential theft, defense evasion, and lateral movement into higher-value systems. Leadership should treat this as a scheduled patch-management priority rather than an emergency, while recognizing that unpatched endpoint and server fleets remain a meaningful chaining risk for any intrusion already underway.

Business Impact: Medium
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 74% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Windows OLE ships in all supported Windows client and server editions
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
Medium
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

39
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +39
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

A heap overflow occurs when a program writes data beyond the bounds of a buffer allocated in the heap memory region.

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2025-13315 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-13316 HIGH POC
8.2 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy