Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessLure victim to malicious RDP server
-
ExploitUser connects with Remote Desktop Client
-
ExecutionServer sends crafted data triggering use-after-free
-
ImpactExecute arbitrary code as connecting user
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Memory lifecycle management
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the victim to use the Windows Remote Desktop Client to connect to an attacker-controlled or compromised RDP server; the use-after-free is triggered by malicious server-side responses processed by the client during the session. The key limiting factor is mandatory user interaction (UI:R) - the attack is not zero-click and cannot be driven purely by the attacker; the victim must be induced to initiate the RDP connection (e.g., via a malicious .rdp file, link, or social engineering). No authentication to the victim's system is needed (PR:N), and no special non-default client configuration is indicated, but the dependence on outbound user-initiated connections meaningfully narrows real-world exposure compared to a server-side listener flaw. |
| Impact | This is a genuine high-priority client-side vulnerability, though not a drop-everything emergency based on available signals. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 8.8) confirms a network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated code-execution flaw, but the UI:R (user interaction required) metric is the decisive moderating factor: this is a use-after-free (CWE-416) in the Remote Desktop CLIENT, meaning the victim must initiate or accept a connection to an attacker-controlled or compromised RDP endpoint rather than being attacked passively. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC were provided, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no evidence of active exploitation - the 8.8 rating reflects potential impact, not demonstrated weaponization. Note a signal conflict worth flagging: the input Tags include 'Denial Of Service', but the description and CVSS impact triad (C:H/I:H/A:H) describe full remote code execution, not merely a crash - the DoS tag understates the true impact and should be treated with caution. Overall, prioritize patching given the ubiquity of the Windows RDP client, but the mandatory user interaction and absence of exploitation signals place this below internet-facing, zero-click server-side RCEs. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker stands up a malicious RDP server (or compromises a legitimate one) and lures a victim - via phishing, a malicious .rdp file, or a crafted link - into connecting with the Windows Remote Desktop Client. During the session the server returns malformed data that triggers a use-after-free in the client, letting the attacker execute code in the context of the connecting user. No public POC is referenced, and exploitation requires the victim to actively establish the connection (UI:R). |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 13, 2026
Remote code execution in Microsoft Remote Desktop Client can be triggered when a victim connects to a malicious or compromised RDP server, exploiting a use-after-free (CWE-416) condition during processing of server responses. The vulnerability requires user interaction (UI:R) - the victim must initiate the RDP connection, for example via a malicious .rdp file or social engineering - but no authentication to the victim's system is needed (PR:N), and it is remotely exploitable with low complexity (AV:N/AC:L). CVSS 3.1 score is 8.8, reflecting high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact; no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, and there is no CISA KEV confirmation of active exploitation.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch version is identified in the available data; however, the Microsoft Security Response Center advisory at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-108458 should be monitored for security updates or mitigations. In the interim, because exploitation requires the victim to initiate an RDP connection to a malicious server, the most effective compensating controls involve reducing exposure: avoid connecting to untrusted or unknown RDP servers, exercise caution with unsolicited .rdp files and links, and consider blocking outbound RDP (TCP 3389) from high-risk systems where Remote Desktop Client is not required (trade-off: may disrupt legitimate remote administration). Additionally, user awareness training on social engineering that leads to malicious RDP connections can help reduce the attack surface. If the advisory publishes a patch, apply it immediately.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 19 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The vulnerability is a use-after-free (CWE-416) in the Remote Desktop Client, a component used to establish outbound RDP sessions to remote servers. During an RDP session, the client processes various server responses; a malicious server can craft responses that cause the client to dereference memory after it has been freed, leading to memory corruption that can be leveraged for code execution in the context of the client process. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) indicates the attack is network-based, requires no privileges on the victim's system, and needs the victim to initiate the connection (UI:R). The scope is unchanged, meaning the vulnerable component and the impacted component are the same. The root cause class, use-after-free, arises from improper memory lifecycle management when handling untrusted server-controlled data. The affected product is Microsoft's Remote Desktop Client; specific affected versions are not enumerated in the input data, but the Microsoft Security Response Center advisory (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-108458) should list exact builds and platforms.
Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Client-side UAF reached over the network with no attacker privileges (PR:N) but requiring the victim to connect to a malicious server (UI:R); successful RCE yields full C/I/A impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Use after free in Remote Desktop Client allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Executive ViewAI
Microsoft Remote Desktop Client is affected by a high-severity remote code execution vulnerability that can compromise employee workstations when users connect to a malicious or compromised RDP server. Because no vendor-released patch has been identified at the time of analysis, remote and hybrid workers, IT support staff, and any teams relying on RDP for external access remain at elevated risk. Leadership should prioritize interim controls and user awareness to prevent endpoint compromise and potential lateral movement until Microsoft issues a fix.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis; interim mitigations include restricting outbound RDP to trusted servers, blocking .rdp file execution, enforcing application allowlisting, segmenting networks, and monitoring for anomalous RDP client behavior.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Use-after-free vulnerabilities occur when a program continues to access memory through a pointer after that memory has been deallocated.
Memory corruption occurs when a program writes data beyond the boundaries of allocated memory regions or accesses memory in unintended ways, violating the integrity of the process's address space.
Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio
Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in
A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr
Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables
Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker
Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b
An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote
FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit
Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio
Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred
Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/
React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo
EUVD-2026-99067
GHSA-pqv8-wrpp-rhm2
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB