Skip to main content

HP ThinPro EUVDEUVD-2026-92792

| CVE-2026-84900 MEDIUM
Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value (CWE-354)
2026-10-05 hp-security-alert@hp.com GHSA-g6h8-8gm7-qw94
6.8
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: hp
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain physical access to ThinPro endpoint
  2. Exploit
    Manipulate data/firmware past integrity check (CWE-354)
  3. Execution
    Extract or alter protected configuration/data
  4. Impact
    Compromise endpoint confidentiality and integrity

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A08:2025 - Software or Data Integrity Failures
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Integrity verification
Exploitation Conditions

Requires LOCAL PHYSICAL ACCESS to an HP ThinPro device (CVSS AV:P) - there is no remote or network attack path. Exploitation leverages improper validation of an integrity check value (CWE-354), meaning the attacker manipulates data/firmware/images that the device fails to properly verify; low attack complexity (AC:L) and no authentication (PR:N) or user interaction (UI:N) are needed once physical access exists. LIMITING FACTORS: the mandatory physical-access requirement severely narrows the realistic threat to scenarios with unattended or shared endpoints (kiosks, lobbies, unsecured VDI terminals); affected systems are limited to HP ThinPro versions prior to 8.1 SP10 (8.1 branch) and prior to 9 SP3 (9 branch). No availability impact (VA:N).

Impact

Real-world risk is MODERATE-but-constrained. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N) is the dominant signal: exploitation requires PHYSICAL access to the device, which is the single largest limiting factor and the reason the base score sits at 6.8 despite high confidentiality and integrity impact (VC:H/VI:H, VA:N). No EPSS score, KEV listing, or POC was provided in the input - there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no evidence of active exploitation, so this is not a drop-everything priority. Signals are internally consistent (physical vector + high C/I + no availability impact is coherent for a thin-client integrity flaw), but note a CLASSIFICATION TENSION: the input Tag says 'Information Disclosure' while CWE-354 (Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value) and the vector's VI:H point to an integrity/tampering issue, not purely disclosure - treat the one-word tag as incomplete rather than authoritative. Also note the HP advisory text is a generic boilerplate roll-up ('could potentially contain security vulnerabilities') and does not describe the specific flaw, so technical specifics are inferred from CWE and the CVSS vector, not confirmed by a detailed vendor writeup.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with hands-on physical access to an HP ThinPro thin client (e.g., an unattended kiosk, lobby, or shared VDI endpoint) exploits weak or missing integrity validation (CWE-354) to tamper with or extract protected data/firmware that should have failed an integrity check. Because the CVSS vector is AV:P/AC:L/PR:N, no credentials and only low attacker effort are needed once physical access is obtained, but remote or network exploitation is not possible. No public exploit identified at time of analysis.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 05, 2026

Improper validation of integrity check values in HP ThinPro thin-client OS images allows an attacker who already has physical access to a device to supply tampered data that the system fails to verify, resulting in high confidentiality and integrity impact (CVSS:3.1 AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N; vendor CVSS 4.0 base 6.8). Organizations are affected if they run HP ThinPro 8.1 prior to Service Pack 10 or HP ThinPro 9 prior to Service Pack 3, typically on kiosks, lobbies, and shared VDI endpoints where physical access is loosely controlled. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV, so the realistic risk is moderate and tightly constrained by the mandatory physical-access prerequisite rather than by remote exposure.

RemediationAI

The primary fix is to upgrade: HP ThinPro 8.1 branch devices must be updated to 8.1 SP10, and HP ThinPro 9 branch devices must be updated to 9 SP3 (vendor-released patch: HP ThinPro 8.1 SP10 and HP ThinPro 9 SP3), per advisories https://support.hp.com/us-en/document/ish_15735991-15736015-16/hpsbhf04155 and https://support.hp.com/us-en/document/ish_15736095-15736118-16/hpsbhf04154. Because exploitation requires physical access, the most effective compensating controls are physical and boot-path hardening: lock enclosures or kiosk mounts for unattended endpoints, set BIOS/UEFI administrator passwords, disable booting from external media and disable unused USB ports in firmware (side effect: complicates field reimaging and peripheral support, so keep recovery credentials escrowed), enable secure boot where the platform supports it, and place thin clients on a segregated VDI segment with certificate-based device authentication so a compromised endpoint cannot pivot (trade-off: added deployment and certificate-management overhead). Until every device is on the patched service packs, restrict unsupervised visitor access to thin-client rooms and audit endpoint inventory for unsupported 8.1 and 9 builds; note that no vendor-released mitigation short of the service packs was identified in the available data.

Affected VersionsENISA

ThinPro 9 0 <ThinPro 9 SP3
ThinPro 8.1 0 <ThinPro 8.1 SP10

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The root cause is CWE-354, Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value: the software compares or trusts an integrity check value (for example a checksum, signature, or hash associated with a system image, firmware component, or configuration blob) without properly verifying it, so a modified artifact can be accepted as authentic. In the thin-client context this class of defect undermines the trust chain that is supposed to guarantee that boot images, packages, or persisted configuration on the HP ThinPro endpoint have not been altered. The vendor CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N) confirms the assessment: the attack vector is physical, attack complexity is low, no privileges or user interaction are required, confidentiality and integrity impacts are high, and availability is not affected. No network or adjacent attack path exists, which is the dominant limiting factor on exploitability; the flaw is only reachable by a person with hands-on access to the appliance.

Know when HP gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (hp) PRIMARY 6.8 MEDIUM
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 6.1 MEDIUM

Physical access only (AV:P) with low complexity and no auth or interaction, yielding high confidentiality and integrity impact but no availability effect, per CWE-354 and the vendor vector.

3.1 AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
4.0 AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (hp).

CVSS VectorVendor: hp

Attack Vector
Physical
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
None
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

Previous versions of HP ThinPro (prior to HP ThinPro 8.1 SP10) could potentially contain security vulnerabilities. HP has released HP ThinPro 8.1 SP10, which includes updates to mitigate potential vulnerabilities. Previous versions of HP ThinPro (prior to HP ThinPro 9 SP3) could potentially contain security vulnerabilities. HP has released HP ThinPro 9 SP3, which includes updates to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 97% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche Linux thin-client OS, VDI/enterprise endpoint segment only
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

34
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +34
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

More in HP

View all
CVE-2015-3113 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jun 23

Adobe Flash Player contains a heap-based buffer overflow that allows remote code execution, exploited as a zero-day in J

CVE-2012-1823 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 11

sapi/cgi/cgi_main.c in PHP before 5.3.12 and 5.4.x before 5.4.2, when configured as a CGI script (aka php-cgi), does not

CVE-2017-5638 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Mar 11

The Jakarta Multipart parser in Apache Struts 2 2.3.x before 2.3.32 and 2.5.x before 2.5.10.1 has incorrect exception ha

CVE-2017-3881 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Mar 17

A vulnerability in the Cisco Cluster Management Protocol (CMP) processing code in Cisco IOS and Cisco IOS XE Software co

CVE-2013-4810 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Sep 16

HP ProCurve Manager (PCM) 3.20 and 4.0, PCM+ 3.20 and 4.0, Identity Driven Manager (IDM) 4.0, and Application Lifecycle

CVE-2015-8651 HIGH
8.8 Dec 28

Remote code execution in Adobe Flash Player allows network attackers to execute arbitrary code via integer overflow expl

CVE-2016-2004 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 21

HPE Data Protector before 7.03_108, 8.x before 8.15, and 9.x before 9.06 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary cod

CVE-2014-2623 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Jul 18

Unspecified vulnerability in HP Storage Data Protector 8.x allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unknown

CVE-2013-6221 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Jun 18

Directory traversal vulnerability in CommunicationServlet in HP Service Virtualization 3.x before 3.50.1, when the AutoP

CVE-2013-2367 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Jul 31

Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in HP SiteScope 11.20 and 11.21, when SOAP is used, allow remote attackers to execu

CVE-2013-4811 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Sep 16

UpdateDomainControllerServlet in the SNAC registration server in HP ProCurve Manager (PCM) 3.20 and 4.0, PCM+ 3.20 and 4

CVE-2013-4798 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Jul 29

Unspecified vulnerability in HP LoadRunner before 11.52 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unknown ve

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy