Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain write-scoped/authenticated message access
-
DeliveryCraft attachment with multiple source fields
-
ExploitHide host path behind allowed source
-
ExecutionBypass sandbox path validation
-
PersistTelegram delivery reads host file
-
ImpactExfiltrate file contents to attacker
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V5 - File Handling Path canonicalization, traversal prevention
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Discovery, Collection The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires an OpenClaw deployment before 2026.8.1 with Telegram delivery configured/active, and an attacker able to submit structured message attachments to the agent (PR:L - a write-scoped caller or a steered agent turn, not fully anonymous). Exploitation specifically abuses attachments carrying multiple 'source' fields so an unvalidated absolute host path is hidden behind an allowed attachment source, defeating sandbox path validation. Limiting factors: the caller needs message-submission privilege, the Telegram delivery channel must be in use to carry the exfiltrated file out, and impact is confined to reading files already present on the host - no code execution, modification, or denial of service. |
| Impact | This is a genuine but moderate-priority information-disclosure flaw, not an overhyped high-CVSS item. The vendor CVSS4 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N, score 7.1) is internally consistent: network-reachable, low complexity, but requiring some privilege (PR:L - an authenticated/write-scoped caller or steered agent able to submit structured message attachments), with impact confined to confidentiality (host file read/exfiltration) and no integrity or availability effect. No EPSS score, CISA KEV listing, or public POC is present in the provided intelligence, so there is no evidence of active exploitation or automated weaponization - real-world risk is currently 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' The PR:L requirement and the narrow confidentiality-only impact meaningfully cap real-world risk below what the 7.1 base score alone suggests; this is a targeted data-leak primitive against an operator's own host rather than a mass-exploitable RCE. No conflicting signals: the CVSS vector, CWE-22, and the description all agree the flaw is a sandbox path-validation bypass enabling arbitrary host file disclosure. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who can submit structured messages to an OpenClaw agent crafts an attachment containing multiple 'source' fields, placing an allowed sandbox source alongside a hidden absolute host path (e.g., an SSH key, token file, or config). Because OpenClaw validates only some source fields, the unvalidated host path slips past the sandbox check and the Telegram delivery path reads and transmits the sensitive file to the attacker. No public exploit code is identified, but the multi-source-field trick is straightforward once the field-parsing weakness is known. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 26, 2026
Sensitive local file disclosure in OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 lets a low-privileged caller (PR:L per the CVSS vector, not fully anonymous) smuggle an unvalidated absolute host path past sandbox path validation by supplying structured message attachments that carry multiple 'source' fields, hiding the disallowed path behind an allowed attachment source. When the Telegram delivery channel is configured and active, the agent then reads the referenced host file and relays it out through that channel, giving the attacker high-confidentiality read access to files that policy would otherwise reject. There is no code execution, file modification, or denial of service; EPSS and KEV data are not provided, and no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis. The vendor has released a fix, and exploitation requires both a message-submission-capable attacker and an OpenClaw deployment that uses Telegram delivery.
RemediationAI
Upgrade to OpenClaw 2026.8.1 or later, which is the first version outside the affected range and the version the vendor patch targets; confirm the running build reports 2026.8.1+ after deployment, and consult the GitHub advisory at https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-fphf-69cp-h5xw plus the VulnCheck advisory at https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-before-2026.8.1-path-traversal-via-structured-attachments for vendor guidance. If upgrading cannot be done immediately, disable the Telegram delivery integration on any affected instance (this removes the egress channel but also stops all legitimate Telegram notifications), and/or disable structured message attachments with multiple source fields at the ingress layer - rejecting attachments that define more than one 'source' - which restores the validation guarantee at the cost of breaking legitimate multi-source attachment workflows. Restrict who can submit message traffic to the agent so that only fully trusted, non-write-scoped callers can reach the attachment parser, since exploitation requires message-submission privilege (PR:L) rather than anonymous access. Run the OpenClaw process under a least-privilege service account, in a container with read-only bind mounts and no access to credential, configuration, or SSH material on the host, so that any residual path-traversal read is confined to non-sensitive files; this is a containment control only and does not fix the validation gap. Note that vendor patch availability is confirmed ("Available from vendor") and no public exploit code was identified at time of analysis, so immediate emergency action is not warranted, but unpatched instances with Telegram delivery active should be prioritized for upgrade.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause is a CWE-22 path traversal class defect in OpenClaw's structured attachment handling: the pre-2026.8.1 validation logic checks attachment source fields selectively rather than exhaustively, so an attachment that presents more than one 'source' entry is evaluated only against the allowed source while an unvalidated absolute host path rides along in the unchecked field. OpenClaw's sandbox relies on this validation as its enforcement point, meaning the parser/validator mismatch - not a memory-safety or cryptographic weakness - is what lets a caller escape the intended path boundary. The exfiltration channel is the Telegram delivery integration, which reads the resolved file path and transmits the file contents to the configured Telegram destination, effectively turning a trusted outbound messaging integration into a data-egress primitive. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:openclaw:openclaw:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* combined with the EUVD range "OpenClaw 0 <2026.8.1" scopes all releases prior to 2026.8.1; the assessed CVSS:3.1 vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N confirms network reachability, low privileges, no user interaction, and impact limited to confidentiality. No I, A, or scope-change component is present, and the assessed risk position is a genuine but moderate-priority information-disclosure flaw rather than an overhyped high-severity item.
Know when Openclaw gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Network-reachable structured-message submission needs write-scoped privilege (PR:L) but is low-complexity; impact is arbitrary host file disclosure only, so C:H with I:N/A:N and no scope change.
Primary rating from Vendor (VulnCheck).
CVSS VectorVendor: VulnCheck
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
OpenClaw versions before 2026.8.1 fail to validate all source fields in structured message attachments, allowing attackers to hide unvalidated host paths behind allowed attachment sources. Attackers can exploit this by providing multiple source fields to bypass sandbox path validation and cause Telegram delivery to read and send known host files that would otherwise be rejected.
Articles & Coverage 1
Technical POC Analysis
OpenClaw's handling of structured message attachments is a path-validation bypass, classified in the advisory under CWE-22 (the GitHub advisory also tags CWE-180).
Full technical POC analysis - root cause, step-by-step exploitation and patch breakdown - is part of the Pro and Business plans.
Executive ViewAI
OpenClaw deployments before version 2026.8.1 are vulnerable to sensitive local file disclosure, allowing an authenticated low-privileged attacker to exfiltrate host files via the Telegram delivery channel; no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis. This affects organizations using OpenClaw with Telegram integration enabled, putting confidential data such as configuration files or credentials at risk. Leadership should prioritize patching to 2026.8.1 to prevent potential data breaches.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Path traversal exploits occur when applications use user-controlled input to construct file system paths without proper validation.
Auth bypass in OpenClaw voice-call extension before 2026.2.1. EPSS 0.68%. PoC and patch available.
Privilege escalation in OpenClaw (pre-2026.3.28) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to gain administrative access b
OpenClaw versions 2026.2.22 through 2026.2.24 contain a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows authenticated att
An authorization mismatch vulnerability in OpenClaw versions prior to 2026.3.1 allows authenticated users with operator.
OpenClaw versions prior to 2026.1.29 automatically establish WebSocket connections to attacker-controlled gateway URLs e
Path traversal in OpenClaw through version 2026.3.23 enables unauthenticated remote attackers to read arbitrary files in
Directory-context bypass in OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 allows authenticated attackers with user interaction to reuse an 'a
Unauthenticated access to the noVNC observer interface in OpenClaw's Docker sandbox browser allows anyone who can reach
OpenClaw versions before 2026.2.26 allow authenticated attackers to write arbitrary files outside the workspace director
OpenClaw versions prior to 2026.2.22 contain a shell environment variable injection vulnerability in the system.run func
OpenClaw versions prior to 2026.2.22 contain a resource exhaustion vulnerability where the application fails to consiste
OpenClaw versions prior to 2026.3.1 contain a sandbox escape vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers with low
EUVD-2026-87514
GHSA-xwq7-8jj4-2g7j
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB