Skip to main content

OpenClaw EUVDEUVD-2026-87514

| CVE-2026-100536 HIGH
Path Traversal (CWE-22)
2026-09-26 VulnCheck GHSA-xwq7-8jj4-2g7j
7.1
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: VulnCheck
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain write-scoped/authenticated message access
  2. Delivery
    Craft attachment with multiple source fields
  3. Exploit
    Hide host path behind allowed source
  4. Execution
    Bypass sandbox path validation
  5. Persist
    Telegram delivery reads host file
  6. Impact
    Exfiltrate file contents to attacker

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V5 - File Handling Path canonicalization, traversal prevention
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Discovery, Collection

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires an OpenClaw deployment before 2026.8.1 with Telegram delivery configured/active, and an attacker able to submit structured message attachments to the agent (PR:L - a write-scoped caller or a steered agent turn, not fully anonymous). Exploitation specifically abuses attachments carrying multiple 'source' fields so an unvalidated absolute host path is hidden behind an allowed attachment source, defeating sandbox path validation. Limiting factors: the caller needs message-submission privilege, the Telegram delivery channel must be in use to carry the exfiltrated file out, and impact is confined to reading files already present on the host - no code execution, modification, or denial of service.

Impact

This is a genuine but moderate-priority information-disclosure flaw, not an overhyped high-CVSS item. The vendor CVSS4 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N, score 7.1) is internally consistent: network-reachable, low complexity, but requiring some privilege (PR:L - an authenticated/write-scoped caller or steered agent able to submit structured message attachments), with impact confined to confidentiality (host file read/exfiltration) and no integrity or availability effect. No EPSS score, CISA KEV listing, or public POC is present in the provided intelligence, so there is no evidence of active exploitation or automated weaponization - real-world risk is currently 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' The PR:L requirement and the narrow confidentiality-only impact meaningfully cap real-world risk below what the 7.1 base score alone suggests; this is a targeted data-leak primitive against an operator's own host rather than a mass-exploitable RCE. No conflicting signals: the CVSS vector, CWE-22, and the description all agree the flaw is a sandbox path-validation bypass enabling arbitrary host file disclosure.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who can submit structured messages to an OpenClaw agent crafts an attachment containing multiple 'source' fields, placing an allowed sandbox source alongside a hidden absolute host path (e.g., an SSH key, token file, or config). Because OpenClaw validates only some source fields, the unvalidated host path slips past the sandbox check and the Telegram delivery path reads and transmits the sensitive file to the attacker. No public exploit code is identified, but the multi-source-field trick is straightforward once the field-parsing weakness is known.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.4% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 26, 2026

Sensitive local file disclosure in OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 lets a low-privileged caller (PR:L per the CVSS vector, not fully anonymous) smuggle an unvalidated absolute host path past sandbox path validation by supplying structured message attachments that carry multiple 'source' fields, hiding the disallowed path behind an allowed attachment source. When the Telegram delivery channel is configured and active, the agent then reads the referenced host file and relays it out through that channel, giving the attacker high-confidentiality read access to files that policy would otherwise reject. There is no code execution, file modification, or denial of service; EPSS and KEV data are not provided, and no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis. The vendor has released a fix, and exploitation requires both a message-submission-capable attacker and an OpenClaw deployment that uses Telegram delivery.

RemediationAI

Upgrade to OpenClaw 2026.8.1 or later, which is the first version outside the affected range and the version the vendor patch targets; confirm the running build reports 2026.8.1+ after deployment, and consult the GitHub advisory at https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-fphf-69cp-h5xw plus the VulnCheck advisory at https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-before-2026.8.1-path-traversal-via-structured-attachments for vendor guidance. If upgrading cannot be done immediately, disable the Telegram delivery integration on any affected instance (this removes the egress channel but also stops all legitimate Telegram notifications), and/or disable structured message attachments with multiple source fields at the ingress layer - rejecting attachments that define more than one 'source' - which restores the validation guarantee at the cost of breaking legitimate multi-source attachment workflows. Restrict who can submit message traffic to the agent so that only fully trusted, non-write-scoped callers can reach the attachment parser, since exploitation requires message-submission privilege (PR:L) rather than anonymous access. Run the OpenClaw process under a least-privilege service account, in a container with read-only bind mounts and no access to credential, configuration, or SSH material on the host, so that any residual path-traversal read is confined to non-sensitive files; this is a containment control only and does not fix the validation gap. Note that vendor patch availability is confirmed ("Available from vendor") and no public exploit code was identified at time of analysis, so immediate emergency action is not warranted, but unpatched instances with Telegram delivery active should be prioritized for upgrade.

Affected VersionsENISA

OpenClaw 0 <2026.8.1

Affected Packages

euvd openclaw fix: 2026.8.1

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The root cause is a CWE-22 path traversal class defect in OpenClaw's structured attachment handling: the pre-2026.8.1 validation logic checks attachment source fields selectively rather than exhaustively, so an attachment that presents more than one 'source' entry is evaluated only against the allowed source while an unvalidated absolute host path rides along in the unchecked field. OpenClaw's sandbox relies on this validation as its enforcement point, meaning the parser/validator mismatch - not a memory-safety or cryptographic weakness - is what lets a caller escape the intended path boundary. The exfiltration channel is the Telegram delivery integration, which reads the resolved file path and transmits the file contents to the configured Telegram destination, effectively turning a trusted outbound messaging integration into a data-egress primitive. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:openclaw:openclaw:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* combined with the EUVD range "OpenClaw 0 <2026.8.1" scopes all releases prior to 2026.8.1; the assessed CVSS:3.1 vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N confirms network reachability, low privileges, no user interaction, and impact limited to confidentiality. No I, A, or scope-change component is present, and the assessed risk position is a genuine but moderate-priority information-disclosure flaw rather than an overhyped high-severity item.

Know when Openclaw gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (VulnCheck) PRIMARY 7.1 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 6.5 MEDIUM

Network-reachable structured-message submission needs write-scoped privilege (PR:L) but is low-complexity; impact is arbitrary host file disclosure only, so C:H with I:N/A:N and no scope change.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (VulnCheck).

CVSS VectorVendor: VulnCheck

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
None
Vulnerable system: Availability
None
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Sep 26, 2026 - 03:01 EUVD
CVE Published
Sep 26, 2026 - 02:18 cve.org
HIGH 7.1

DescriptionCVE.org

OpenClaw versions before 2026.8.1 fail to validate all source fields in structured message attachments, allowing attackers to hide unvalidated host paths behind allowed attachment sources. Attackers can exploit this by providing multiple source fields to bypass sandbox path validation and cause Telegram delivery to read and send known host files that would otherwise be rejected.

Technical POC Analysis

OpenClaw's handling of structured message attachments is a path-validation bypass, classified in the advisory under CWE-22 (the GitHub advisory also tags CWE-180).

Full technical POC analysis - root cause, step-by-step exploitation and patch breakdown - is part of the Pro and Business plans.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

OpenClaw deployments before version 2026.8.1 are vulnerable to sensitive local file disclosure, allowing an authenticated low-privileged attacker to exfiltrate host files via the Telegram delivery channel; no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis. This affects organizations using OpenClaw with Telegram integration enabled, putting confidential data such as configuration files or credentials at risk. Leadership should prioritize patching to 2026.8.1 to prevent potential data breaches.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.4%
Top 65% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche open-source Node.js agent framework, no broad enterprise footprint
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.4%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

36
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +36
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Path traversal exploits occur when applications use user-controlled input to construct file system paths without proper validation.

CVE-2026-28446 CRITICAL POC
9.4 Mar 05

Auth bypass in OpenClaw voice-call extension before 2026.2.1. EPSS 0.68%. PoC and patch available.

CVE-2026-33579 CRITICAL POC
9.4 Mar 31

Privilege escalation in OpenClaw (pre-2026.3.28) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to gain administrative access b

CVE-2026-32042 HIGH POC
8.8 Mar 21

OpenClaw versions 2026.2.22 through 2026.2.24 contain a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows authenticated att

CVE-2026-32051 HIGH POC
8.8 Mar 21

An authorization mismatch vulnerability in OpenClaw versions prior to 2026.3.1 allows authenticated users with operator.

CVE-2026-25253 HIGH POC
8.8 Feb 01

OpenClaw versions prior to 2026.1.29 automatically establish WebSocket connections to attacker-controlled gateway URLs e

CVE-2026-32846 HIGH POC
8.7 Mar 26

Path traversal in OpenClaw through version 2026.3.23 enables unauthenticated remote attackers to read arbitrary files in

CVE-2026-100530 HIGH POC
8.5 Sep 26

Directory-context bypass in OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 allows authenticated attackers with user interaction to reuse an 'a

CVE-2026-32064 HIGH POC
8.5 Mar 21

Unauthenticated access to the noVNC observer interface in OpenClaw's Docker sandbox browser allows anyone who can reach

CVE-2026-32055 HIGH POC
7.6 Mar 21

OpenClaw versions before 2026.2.26 allow authenticated attackers to write arbitrary files outside the workspace director

CVE-2026-32056 HIGH POC
7.5 Mar 21

OpenClaw versions prior to 2026.2.22 contain a shell environment variable injection vulnerability in the system.run func

CVE-2026-32049 HIGH POC
7.5 Mar 21

OpenClaw versions prior to 2026.2.22 contain a resource exhaustion vulnerability where the application fails to consiste

CVE-2026-32048 HIGH POC
7.5 Mar 21

OpenClaw versions prior to 2026.3.1 contain a sandbox escape vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers with low

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy