Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Deliver crafted input to HPLIP component
  2. Delivery
    Local user actively processes malicious data
  3. Exploit
    Trigger OS command injection (CWE-78)
  4. Execution
    Execute attacker commands in user context
  5. Impact
    Modify files or alter system state

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires LOCAL access to a system running HP's HPLIP (HP Linux Imaging and Printing) software (AV:L) and ACTIVE user interaction (UI:A) - a local user must process or act on attacker-supplied input for the CWE-78 command injection to fire. No prior authentication is needed (PR:N), but the local vector plus mandatory user interaction are the key limiting factors: this cannot be triggered remotely against a default configuration without a user performing the enabling action. The exact HPLIP feature/component is not disclosed in the umbrella bulletin, so defenders should treat any HPLIP-processing workflow (print/scan job handling, device setup) as the potential trigger surface.

Impact

The vendor CVSS 4.0 score of 6.8 (AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:L/VI:H/VA:L) describes a LOCAL, low-complexity issue that requires ACTIVE user interaction (UI:A) and yields high integrity impact (VI:H) with only low confidentiality/availability impact - consistent with CWE-78 OS command injection leading to unauthorized file/command modification rather than full remote takeover. Despite the umbrella description listing 'remote code execution,' the machine vector for THIS CVE is explicitly local (AV:L), so remote unauthenticated RCE is NOT supported by the vector - the broad description reflects the multi-CVE bulletin, not this specific finding. There is no EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC in the provided data, so exploitation is: no public exploit identified at time of analysis. No SSVC decision data was supplied. This is a moderate, locally-scoped, interaction-dependent flaw - not a drop-everything priority; the primary real-world risk is a local user being induced to trigger a malicious action (e.g., processing a crafted file/job) that injects OS commands.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker crafts malicious input (such as a print job, device configuration, or file) that reaches an HPLIP component vulnerable to OS command injection; when a local user actively processes or opens it (UI:A), attacker-controlled shell commands execute in that user's context, allowing unauthorized file modification or command execution. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, and the local attack vector plus required user interaction limit mass exploitation.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 16, 2026

Command injection (CWE-78) in HP's HPLIP (HP Linux Imaging and Printing) software enables an unauthenticated local user to execute commands or modify files with high integrity impact (VI:H) after active user interaction, matching HP's CVSS 4.0 score of 6.8 (AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:A/VC:L/VI:H/VA:L) and the independent CVSS 3.1 assessment (AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/C:L/I:H/A:L). The HP security bulletin HPSBPI04151 bundles this issue with other externally reported HPLIP flaws that could lead to remote code execution, privilege escalation, denial of service, or information disclosure, but the exact vulnerable component is not disclosed. No public exploit code or CISA KEV entry is identified at time of analysis, and the local vector plus mandatory user interaction prevents triggering without a user processing attacker-supplied input.

RemediationAI

HP has released security bulletin HPSBPI04151 to remediate these issues; apply the vendor-supplied HPLIP updates as soon as possible, following the advisory at https://support.hp.com/us-en/document/ish_15646959-15646984-16/hpsbpi04151 for exact patch versions (the available data does not specify a fixed version number, so treat this as 'Patch available per vendor advisory'). Until patched, reduce exposure by restricting local access to trusted users, avoiding processing untrusted print jobs, scan inputs, or device configuration files, and monitoring for unexpected file modifications or command executions in HPLIP processes. Disabling or removing unnecessary HPLIP components can eliminate the attack surface but will break printing and scanning functionality; weigh that trade-off against the local, user-interaction-dependent nature of the exploit.

Affected VersionsENISA

HP Linux Imaging and Printing Software (HPLIP) 0 <3.26.6

Affected Packages

euvd hp_linux_imaging_and_printing_software_hplip fix: 3.26.6

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability class is OS command injection (CWE-78), meaning HPLIP fails to neutralize special elements in a command string before passing it to a shell. HPLIP is a suite of printer and scanner drivers and utilities for Linux and Unix-like systems, and it often runs with elevated privileges to access devices. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:hp_inc.:hp_linux_imaging_and_printing_software_(hplip):*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* indicates that all versions of HPLIP are potentially affected, since no version range is specified. Exploitation requires local access (AV:L) and active user interaction (UI:A), such as opening a malicious print job or configuring a device, after which the injected command runs in the context of the HPLIP process. Both the vendor's CVSS 4.0 and the independent CVSS 3.1 vectors agree on high integrity impact (VI:H/I:H) with low confidentiality and availability impact, consistent with file modification or command execution rather than a full system compromise.

Know when Hp Linux Imaging And Printing Software Hplip gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (hp) PRIMARY 6.8 MEDIUM
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:L/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 6.6 MEDIUM

Vendor vector is explicitly local with required user interaction (AV:L/UI:R), no auth (PR:N); command injection gives high integrity (I:H) with only low confidentiality and availability impact.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:L/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
SUSE 6.6 MEDIUM
AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L
Red Hat 6.6 MEDIUM

Primary rating from Vendor (hp).

CVSS VectorVendor: hp

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Active
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
Low
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
Low
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Sep 16, 2026 - 20:18 EUVD
CVE Published
Sep 16, 2026 - 18:47 cve.org
MEDIUM 6.8

DescriptionCVE.org

HP has identified and remediated multiple externally reported vulnerabilities within HPLIP. The findings affect several software components that could potentially enable remote code execution, privilege escalation, denial of service, information disclosure, or unauthorized file modification under certain conditions.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 84% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
HPLIP is the standard HP printer/scanner driver stack on Linux desktops
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

34
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +34
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.

Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

Vendor StatusVendor

SUSE

Severity: Moderate
Product Status
SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Desktop Applications 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7 Affected

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy