Skip to main content

IntelliOps IEM EUVDEUVD-2026-63323

| CVE-2026-21784 MEDIUM
Information Exposure (CWE-200)
2026-08-20 HCL GHSA-hg5c-cxw6-wgq4
4.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: HCL
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Attacker crafts malicious webpage with cross-origin IEM requests
  2. Delivery
    Phish or lure high-privilege IEM user to visit page
  3. Exploit
    Victim's browser sends credentialed cross-origin request to IEM
  4. Execution
    IEM responds without restrictive CORS headers
  5. Persist
    Browser permits attacker script to read response
  6. Impact
    Attacker exfiltrates sensitive IEM data

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V14 - Data Protection Data exposure prevention
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Collection, Discovery

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires a user holding high-privileged credentials in IEM (PR:H per CVSS vector) to actively visit an attacker-controlled web page in the same browser where an IEM session is active (UI:R). The attack is strictly browser-mediated: CORS header absence is only exploitable when a browser enforces the same-origin policy and forwards session cookies cross-origin - server-to-server tooling, API clients, and command-line tools cannot trigger this vulnerability class. The IEM web interface must be reachable from the victim's browser, meaning fully air-gapped deployments are not exposed via this vector. Exploitation does not apply to low-privileged IEM user sessions if high-privilege access is required to reach sensitive endpoints. The combination of required victim privilege level and mandatory user interaction limits this to targeted attacks rather than opportunistic scanning.

Impact

The CVSS 4.8 Medium score reflects a meaningful but constrained attack surface: the two most significant limiters are PR:H (the victim must hold high-privileged IEM credentials) and UI:R (the victim must actively visit an attacker-controlled page while authenticated). These prerequisites considerably reduce the realistic threat population compared to a fully unauthenticated, no-interaction flaw. The Scope:Changed metric elevates the score modestly above what C:L/I:L/A:N would otherwise yield, because the cross-origin boundary crossing extends impact beyond IEM itself into the victim's browser context. No EPSS probability was supplied and IEM is not listed in the CISA KEV catalog, indicating no confirmed widespread or active exploitation at time of analysis. The CPE wildcard version (iem:*) means the full affected version range has not been formally bounded in NVD, introducing some uncertainty about exposure scope. On balance, this is a real but lower-urgency issue: the exploitation path requires a targeted social engineering step against a privileged user, making opportunistic mass exploitation unlikely, though a motivated attacker pursuing a specific high-privilege IEM administrator could plausibly execute it.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker registers or compromises a publicly reachable web page and embeds JavaScript that issues fetch requests with credentials to a target organization's IEM instance. A high-privileged IEM user is lured to this page - via a phishing email or malicious link - while their IEM browser session is active; because IEM returns overly permissive or absent CORS headers, the browser forwards the session cookie and allows the attacker's script to read the IEM API response, potentially harvesting event data, configuration details, or user information. No public proof-of-concept exploit has been identified at time of analysis, so exploitation requires manual construction of the attack page.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 20, 2026

Missing or insecure Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) headers in HCL IntelliOps Event Management (IEM) expose the application to unauthorized cross-origin browser interactions. The CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N vector indicates that a highly privileged IEM user must be socially engineered into visiting a malicious page while authenticated, allowing an attacker's script to read IEM responses or issue limited requests on the victim's behalf. No active exploitation has been confirmed and no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

The primary remediation is to apply the vendor-supplied fix documented in the HCL Software advisory at https://support.hcl-software.com/csm?id=kb_article&sysparm_article=KB0132456. An exact patched IEM version number is not confirmed from the available CPE or reference data; administrators should consult that advisory directly to obtain the specific update. As a compensating control while patching is staged, configure the web server or reverse proxy fronting IEM to return restrictive CORS response headers: set Access-Control-Allow-Origin to an explicit allowlist of trusted internal origins rather than a wildcard, ensure Access-Control-Allow-Credentials is not set to true alongside any broad origin policy, and remove Access-Control-Allow-Methods entries for methods not required by the application. Note that proxy-layer CORS enforcement may be bypassed if the application itself overrides headers, so this is a mitigating control rather than a fix. Additionally, restricting IEM administrative access to internal network segments reduces the probability of successful social-engineering-based exploitation against privileged users.

Affected VersionsENISA

IEM v1.4.0

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

HCL IntelliOps Event Management (IEM) is a web-based IT event management platform (CPE: cpe:2.3:a:hcl_software:iem:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*). The root cause is CWE-200 (Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor) manifesting through absent or improperly configured HTTP CORS response headers - specifically headers such as Access-Control-Allow-Origin, Access-Control-Allow-Credentials, and Access-Control-Allow-Methods. Browsers enforce the same-origin policy, but when a server returns permissive or missing CORS headers, JavaScript executing on a cross-origin attacker-controlled page can issue credentialed requests to the IEM application and read the responses. The Scope:Changed (S:C) metric in the CVSS vector reflects that this attack crosses the browser's same-origin boundary, affecting resources outside the directly vulnerable component.

Know when Iem gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (HCL) PRIMARY 4.8 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
vuln.today AI 4.8 MEDIUM

PR:H and UI:R reflect mandatory high-privilege victim session and active social engineering; S:C captures cross-origin browser boundary crossing; no availability impact applies.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (HCL).

CVSS VectorVendor: HCL

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

HCL IntelliOps Event Management (IEM) is affected by missing or insecure Cross-Origin Security headers. This issue makes the application's environment and resources susceptible to unauthorized external interaction and potential exploitation.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 96% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche enterprise IT event management platform
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium

Priority Score

24
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +24
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy