Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessIdentify Splunk Enterprise deployment and accessible Monitoring Console
-
DeliveryCraft malicious URL embedding SPL into forwarder dashboard parameters
-
ExploitDeliver phishing link to authenticated Splunk user
-
ExecutionVictim opens link; Monitoring Console incorporates unvalidated SPL into search
-
PersistSPL executes under victim's Splunk permissions
-
ImpactAttacker achieves data exfiltration or manipulation bounded by victim's role
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Input validation, allowlisting
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires two concrete preconditions: first, the attacker must successfully deliver a crafted Monitoring Console URL to a target and convince that target to open it (social engineering / phishing); second, that target must be an authenticated Splunk Enterprise user with access to the Monitoring Console. The attacker requires no authentication or prior access to the Splunk instance. The CVSS vector (AC:H, UI:R, PR:N) directly encodes these conditions. The Monitoring Console is present in standard Splunk Enterprise installations and does not require special configuration to be vulnerable. The injected SPL executes strictly within the victim user's role and index permissions - a low-privilege user yields lower impact than an admin. Exploitation is not automatable against unauthenticated users and cannot succeed without the victim actively opening the crafted link. |
| Impact | The CVSS 7.1 (High) score reflects meaningful but conditionally bounded risk. AV:N and PR:N confirm the attacker needs no account or network foothold, but AC:H and UI:R impose two hard constraints: social engineering must succeed (the victim must click a crafted link), and the victim must be an authenticated Splunk user. This is not a fire-and-forget or scannable exploit; it requires targeted phishing. No public proof-of-concept has been identified, and CISA has not added this to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, indicating no confirmed active exploitation at time of analysis. EPSS data was not provided, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood cannot be quantified - this is a missing signal that defenders should note. The C:H and I:H impact ratings are significant: SPL can query any indexed data and invoke write or delete commands up to the victim's role boundary, making the blast radius directly proportional to the victim's privilege level. Organizations running Splunk Enterprise as a central SIEM - where analysts and admins hold broad index access - face the most severe potential impact and should prioritize patching over those using Splunk in narrower roles. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker identifies a Splunk Enterprise deployment and crafts a Monitoring Console URL embedding malicious SPL in the forwarder dashboard's search parameters. The attacker delivers this link to a Splunk operator or administrator via phishing email, Slack message, or similar channel. When the victim - already authenticated to Splunk - clicks the link, the Monitoring Console builds and executes the injected SPL under the victim's identity, allowing the attacker to exfiltrate indexed log data, extract credentials or tokens stored in saved searches, or invoke SPL commands that modify or delete data within the victim's permission scope. No public proof-of-concept has been identified, but the attack pattern mirrors well-understood reflected injection techniques. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Aug 19, 2026
Reflected SPL injection in Splunk Enterprise's Monitoring Console allows an unauthenticated attacker to execute attacker-controlled Search Processing Language commands under the permissions of a phished authenticated victim. Affected versions span four active release trains: 9.4.x below 9.4.14, 10.0.x below 10.0.9, 10.2.x below 10.2.6, and 10.4.x below 10.4.2. No public exploit or CISA KEV listing exists at time of analysis, though successful exploitation grants full read and write access to all data and actions permitted by the victim's Splunk role.
RemediationAI
The definitive fix is upgrading Splunk Enterprise to a patched release: 9.4.14, 10.0.9, 10.2.6, or 10.4.2, depending on the deployed branch. Full patch details are documented in vendor advisory SVD-2026-0801 at https://advisory.splunk.com/advisories/SVD-2026-0801. Where immediate patching is not feasible, restrict network access to the Monitoring Console to known-trusted IP ranges or internal networks via firewall or reverse-proxy controls - this raises the delivery bar for phishing by ensuring the crafted link only reaches users on controlled networks, though it does not prevent a targeted attack against users who legitimately access the console. Additionally, reducing Monitoring Console access to only operators who require it limits the viable victim surface. User awareness training targeted at Splunk administrators - specifically around link-based phishing for internal application URLs - lowers the social engineering success rate that AC:H depends on. None of these workarounds are equivalent to patching, as a sufficiently targeted attacker can overcome all of them.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Splunk Enterprise (CPE: cpe:2.3:a:splunk:splunk_enterprise:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*) includes a Monitoring Console component used for forwarder health and deployment monitoring. The console dynamically constructs Search Processing Language (SPL) queries to drive its forwarder dashboard. CWE-20 (Improper Input Validation) is the root cause: URL parameters or other input data supplied to the dashboard's search-builder are incorporated into SPL queries without adequate sanitization or allowlisting. An attacker embeds malicious SPL fragments into a crafted Monitoring Console URL; when an authenticated user opens that URL, the unsanitized input is interpreted directly by the SPL engine under the victim's credentials. This is a classic reflected injection pattern - analogous to reflected XSS or reflected SQLi - where the interpreter is Splunk's own search engine rather than a browser DOM or SQL database.
Know when Splunk gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Phishing-dependent delivery justifies AC:H and UI:R; no attacker credentials required (PR:N); C:H and I:H reflect unbounded data access and command execution within victim's Splunk role; A:L for incidental availability impact from rogue SPL.
Primary rating from Vendor (cisco).
CVSS VectorVendor: cisco
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.2, 10.2.6, 10.0.9, and 9.4.14, an unauthenticated user could trick an authenticated user into opening a crafted link to Monitoring Console. When the authenticated user opens the link, Splunk Enterprise runs attacker-controlled Search Processing Language (SPL) using the permissions of that user. The injected SPL could access data and perform actions available to that user. The vulnerability is possible because Monitoring Console does not sufficiently validate data used to build forwarder dashboard searches. The vulnerability requires the attacker to phish the user by tricking them into opening the crafted link. The unauthenticated user should not be able to exploit the vulnerability at will.
Executive ViewAI
Splunk Enterprise versions 9.4, 10.0, 10.2, and 10.4 contain a reflected SPL injection vulnerability in the Monitoring Console that could allow attackers to execute arbitrary commands and exfiltrate sensitive data within an authenticated user's Splunk permissions if that user is successfully phished with a malicious link. This threatens data confidentiality and integrity across organizations relying on Splunk for security monitoring and log analytics.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Code injection occurs when an application accepts user input and passes it directly into a language interpreter or evaluator without proper sanitization.
The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packe
Unauthenticated arbitrary file write in Splunk Enterprise (below 10.2.4 and 10.0.7) and Splunk Cloud Platform (below 10.
curl 7.75.0 through 7.76.1 suffers from a use-after-free vulnerability resulting in already freed memory being used when
curl < 7.84.0 supports "chained" HTTP compression algorithms, meaning that a serverresponse can be compressed multiple t
In Splunk Enterprise versions below 9.2.2, 9.1.5, and 9.0.10, a low-privileged user that does not hold the admin or powe
In Splunk Enterprise versions below 9.0.7 and 9.1.2, Splunk Enterprise does not safely sanitize extensible stylesheet la
In versions of Splunk Enterprise below 9.0.5, 8.2.11, and 8.1.14, and Splunk Cloud Platform below version 9.0.2303.100,
In Splunk Enterprise versions below 8.2.9, 8.1.12, and 9.0.2, an authenticated user can execute arbitrary code through t
When curl < 7.84.0 saves cookies, alt-svc and hsts data to local files, it makes the operation atomic by finalizing the
SQLite 1.0.12 through 3.39.x before 3.39.2 sometimes allows an array-bounds overflow if billions of bytes are used in a
A vulnerability exists in curl <7.87.0 HSTS check that could be bypassed to trick it to keep using HTTP. Rated high seve
When doing HTTP(S) transfers, libcurl might erroneously use the read callback (`CURLOPT_READFUNCTION`) to ask for data t
EUVD-2026-62895
GHSA-g3qr-fw24-fxhm
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB