Skip to main content

openssl_encrypt EUVDEUVD-2026-60108

| CVE-2026-74889 CRITICAL
Inadequate Encryption Strength (CWE-326)
2026-08-17 VulnCheck GHSA-fxcp-mjj5-v58w
9.3
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: VulnCheck
Share

Severity by source

Vendor (VulnCheck) PRIMARY
9.3 CRITICAL
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
vuln.today AI
5.9 MEDIUM

Deterministic key derivation weakens confidentiality against multi-target attacks (C:H), but requires collected ciphertexts and cryptanalysis (AC:H); no direct integrity or availability impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (VulnCheck).

CVSS VectorVendor: VulnCheck

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
X

Lifecycle Timeline

3
Analysis Generated
Aug 17, 2026 - 13:08 vuln.today
Patch available
Aug 17, 2026 - 12:01 EUVD
CVE Published
Aug 17, 2026 - 11:04 cve.org
CRITICAL 9.3

DescriptionCVE.org

openssl_encrypt versions before 1.4.0 use HKDF with no salt and static info parameter in key normalization functions, reducing entropy extraction and determinism. Attackers can exploit predictable key derivation with identical inputs to weaken cryptographic security against multi-target attacks.

AnalysisAI

Weak cryptographic key derivation in the openssl_encrypt Python library (all versions before 1.4.0) stems from its key-normalization routines invoking HKDF with no salt and a static info parameter, making derived keys deterministic for identical inputs. This reduces effective entropy and weakens resistance to multi-target (batch) attacks, letting an adversary who collects ciphertexts or derived-key material amortize cryptanalytic effort across many victims. No public exploit identified at time of analysis; the flaw was reported by VulnCheck and a vendor patch is available in 1.4.0.

Technical ContextAI

openssl_encrypt is a Python encryption utility/library (PyPI project 'jahlives:openssl_encrypt') that wraps symmetric encryption workflows. HKDF (HMAC-based Key Derivation Function, RFC 5869) is designed as extract-then-expand: the extract step is meant to be seeded with a random, per-operation salt to bind derived keys to unique contexts, and the info parameter provides domain separation. By calling HKDF with an empty/absent salt and a fixed static info string, the library collapses these protections so that the same input key material always maps to the same output key. This is the classic CWE-326 (Inadequate Encryption Strength) failure mode - the primitive is sound but is configured to remove randomization, undermining the entropy-extraction guarantees HKDF normally provides.

RemediationAI

Upgrade to openssl_encrypt 1.4.0 or later, which is the vendor-released patched version fixing the HKDF key-derivation weakness; consult the GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-j9mh-57cc-665x (https://github.com/jahlives/openssl_encrypt/security/advisories/GHSA-j9mh-57cc-665x) and the VulnCheck advisory for confirmation. Because the defect is in how keys are derived, patching alone does not retroactively secure data already encrypted with weak keys - plan to re-encrypt or rotate any keys/ciphertexts produced by versions before 1.4.0, accepting the operational cost of a re-encryption pass. If an immediate upgrade is not possible, a compensating control is to supply your own randomly generated per-operation salt to HKDF (rather than relying on the library's default empty salt) and unique info values where the API permits, and to avoid reusing identical input key material across targets; the trade-off is that this requires code changes at every call site and careful key-management discipline.

CVE-2026-74872 CRITICAL
9.3 Aug 17

Arbitrary native code execution in the jahlives openssl_encrypt Python package (all versions before 1.4.0) arises from i

CVE-2026-81707 CRITICAL
9.3 Aug 27

Fingerprint-verification spoofing in jahlives openssl_encrypt before 1.4.9 lets attackers embed ANSI escape sequences in

CVE-2026-74895 CRITICAL
9.3 Aug 17

Sandbox escape in the openssl_encrypt Python library (jahlives) before 1.4.0 allows attacker-supplied plugins to run wit

CVE-2026-74886 CRITICAL
9.3 Aug 17

Arbitrary code execution in jahlives openssl_encrypt before 1.4.0 stems from an inconsistent sandbox: the runtime Plugin

CVE-2026-74894 CRITICAL
9.3 Aug 17

Authentication bypass in the jahlives openssl_encrypt library (all versions before 1.4.0) lets remote unauthenticated at

CVE-2026-74878 CRITICAL
9.3 Aug 17

Authentication brute-force protection can be bypassed in jahlives openssl_encrypt before 1.4.0 because the TOTP rate lim

CVE-2026-74899 CRITICAL
9.3 Aug 17

Sandbox escape in the openssl_encrypt Python library (jahlives) before 1.4.0 lets attacker-supplied plugin code break ou

CVE-2026-74900 CRITICAL
9.3 Aug 17

Cryptographic shared-secret disclosure in the openssl_encrypt Python library (maintainer 'jahlives') before 1.4.0 lets a

CVE-2026-74896 CRITICAL
9.3 Aug 17

Sandbox escape leading to remote code execution affects openssl_encrypt (the jahlives Python package) in all versions be

CVE-2026-81719 CRITICAL
9.3 Aug 27

Arbitrary code execution in openssl_encrypt (the jahlives Python encryption utility) before 1.4.9 allows an attacker-sup

CVE-2026-81701 CRITICAL
9.3 Aug 27

Arbitrary code execution in jahlives openssl_encrypt before 1.4.9 stems from a flawed plugin trust model that uses a den

CVE-2026-74880 CRITICAL
9.3 Aug 17

Sensitive-token exposure in openssl_encrypt (the jahlives Python package, pip 'openssl-encrypt') before 1.4.0 stems from

Share

EUVD-2026-60108 vulnerability details – vuln.today

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy