Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAttain admin collaborator access on target private repo
-
DeliveryCreate webhook pointing to attacker-controlled endpoint
-
ExploitOwner revokes collaborator access via Gitea UI
-
ExecutionDeleteCollaboration() omits webhook cleanup, webhook remains active=true
-
PersistSubsequent repo events trigger webhook delivery without creator access re-check
-
ImpactAttacker passively receives full event payloads (issue bodies, commit data, secrets) indefinitely
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Authorization logic validation
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to have previously held admin-level collaboration permission on a private Gitea repository, specifically sufficient permission to create repository-level webhooks (a capability restricted to admin collaborators, not base collaborators). The attacker must configure a webhook pointing to an endpoint they control before their access is revoked. After revocation, no authentication, network access to the Gitea instance, or further attacker interaction is required - the exfiltration is fully passive. Exploitation is limited to Gitea instances running versions prior to 1.27.0. The attack is constrained to repository events that occur after the webhook is created; historical content is not retroactively exposed. The exfiltration is invisible to repository owners unless they manually inspect the webhook list, as Gitea generates no alert on delivery to a webhook whose creator is no longer a collaborator. |
| Impact | The provided CVSS 3.1 vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N yields a score of 6.8 (Medium), which accurately reflects the threat model: the PR:H prerequisite (prior admin collaboration on the targeted repository) substantially limits the attack surface, while S:C and C:H capture that once established, full event payloads - issue bodies, commit data, repository metadata - cross the revoked authorization boundary to an attacker-controlled endpoint. No CISA KEV listing exists and no public proof-of-concept has been identified, suggesting EPSS is low; however, the attack requires no technical sophistication once the precondition is met and would be naturally discovered by any former admin collaborator who notices their webhook remains active. SSVC assessment: exploitation status is none publicly confirmed; automatable is yes post-setup (no further attacker interaction needed); technical impact is partial (confidentiality only). The real-world risk is elevated specifically for organizations that routinely onboard and offboard external collaborators on private repositories, as the exfiltration is persistent and produces no owner-visible alert. CVSS and EPSS signals are consistent - this is a genuine medium priority, not a deprioritized high-CVSS issue. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who holds admin collaborator access on a target private Gitea repository creates a webhook pointing to an endpoint they control, then waits for - or engineers - their access to be revoked by the repository owner. Despite the revocation, Gitea's |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jul 21, 2026
Webhook persistence after collaborator revocation in Gitea (versions prior to 1.27.0) enables a former admin collaborator to receive ongoing real-time exfiltration of private repository content indefinitely after their access is removed. The DeleteCollaboration() function cleans watches and assignees but never removes or disables webhooks created by the departing user, and the webhook delivery subsystem fires payloads on every subsequent repository event without re-validating the creator's current access. The attack is invisible to the repository owner, requires no further action by the attacker post-revocation, and was runtime-confirmed on gitea/gitea:1.25.4; no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
Upgrade to Gitea v1.27.0 or later; this release incorporates the fixes from pull requests #38406 (https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/38406) and #38426 (https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/38426), with corresponding commits de4b8277e9cb576f2315fb03b5ab6478b42a1d31 and f69e15afe7496cc62e96dab244629c69eb31a7bf. If immediate upgrade is not possible, administrators should manually audit and remove webhooks created by any collaborator whose access has been or is being revoked, accessible via repository Settings → Webhooks - note that Gitea does not currently surface the webhook creator in the UI, so this requires cross-referencing webhook creation timestamps with collaboration history. As a partial mitigation, configuring ALLOWED_HOST_LIST in app.ini (refactored to the [security] section in PR #38406) to restrict webhook delivery to trusted external CIDR ranges or hostnames reduces the risk of exfiltration to arbitrary attacker-controlled infrastructure, though it does not remediate the root authorization failure. Restricting admin-level collaboration grants to fully trusted parties is a preventive control with no functional side effects. The advisory is at https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/security/advisories/GHSA-66m4-5jjr-2rg5.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 2 packages in go, euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Gitea is a self-hosted Git service written in Go. The vulnerability resides in services/repository/collaboration.go within the DeleteCollaboration() function, which orchestrates cleanup when a collaborator's access is revoked: it removes the collaboration record, recalculates access levels, drops watchers, and unassigns issues - but performs no webhook lifecycle management. The webhook delivery path, separately, fires payloads synchronously on repository events without consulting current collaborator membership. CWE-863 (Incorrect Authorization) precisely describes the root cause: an authorization check that should exist at webhook delivery time is simply absent. The affected Go package is gitea.dev (CPE: pkg:go/gitea.dev), confirmed vulnerable below version 1.27.0 per GHSA-66m4-5jjr-2rg5. The GHSA advisory also references companion PRs addressing related access-subquery filtering in Actions run listings and SSH key length validation, suggesting the 1.27.0 release is a broader security hardening batch.
Know when Gitea gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
PR:H required for prior admin collaboration to create webhooks; S:C because payloads cross revoked authorization boundary to external endpoint; I:N and A:N as no write or availability impact exists.
Primary rating from Vendor (https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea).
CVSS VectorVendor: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea
DescriptionCVE.org
Affected product
Gitea - services/repository/collaboration.go (DeleteCollaboration) + webhook delivery
Summary
When a collaborator with admin permission on a private repo creates a webhook, that webhook keeps firing after the collaborator's access is revoked. Gitea's revocation cleanup DeleteCollaboration removes the collaboration record, recalculates accesses, drops watches, and unassigns issues - but it does not remove or disable webhooks the user created, and webhook delivery never re-checks whether the creator still has repo access. The former collaborator therefore receives the full payload (issue/comment bodies, commit data) of all future repository events at their controlled endpoint, indefinitely and invisibly.
Affected code
services/repository/collaboration.go→DeleteCollaboration()- cleans watches/assignees only; no
webhook cleanup.
- Webhook delivery path - fires on repo events without re-validating the creator's current access.
Steps to reproduce
Using the provided reproduction materials:
- Attacker (admin collaborator) creates a webhook → revoke access.
- Control:
GET /api/v1/repos/admin/wh-repo(attacker) → 404. GET .../hooks→ webhook stillactive=true.- Admin creates a new issue after revocation → the catcher receives
action:"opened",
issue.title:"CRITICAL SECRET: …", issue.body (sentinel private key), repository.private:true. (Runtime-confirmed on gitea/gitea:1.25.4. Catcher is an internal sentinel listener; the payload is a planted sentinel, not real data; nothing is sent to any external/metadata endpoint.)
Impact
Authenticated former admin-collaborator → ongoing real-time exfiltration of private content created after revocation; invisible to the owner; scope crosses from the application boundary to data the user should no longer access.
Suggested remediation
- On revocation, delete/disable webhooks created by the removed collaborator (or hand them to the owner).
- Re-validate the creator's current repo access before each webhook delivery.
- At minimum, warn admins on revocation if the user created webhooks.
Credit
Reported as part of an incomplete-patch / authorization-residue measurement study (responsible disclosure).
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
Remote code execution in Gitea (self-hosted Git service) via a code-injection flaw (CWE-94) allows attackers to run arbi
Broken access control in Gitea's Composer package registry (versions up to and including 1.26.1) lets remote attackers r
Gitea before 1.16.7 does not escape git fetch remote. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely exp
The git hook feature in Gitea 1.1.0 through 1.12.5 might allow for authenticated remote code execution in customer envir
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Gitea Gitea
Authenticated command injection in Dokploy (self-hostable PaaS) versions 0.29.3 through 0.29.12 lets a low-privileged us
Reverse-proxy authentication bypass in the official Gitea Docker image (versions up to and including 1.26.2) allows any
Path traversal in Gitea's Org-mode (`.org`) markup renderer allows an attacker who can get Org-mode content rendered by
Container escape in Gitea act_runner (Docker backend, through act 0.262.0) lets an authenticated user with workflow-exec
models/repo_mirror.go in Gitea before 1.7.6 and 1.8.x before 1.8-RC3 mishandles mirror repo URL settings, leading to rem
Server-side request forgery and internal repository exfiltration in Gitea before 1.27.0 lets a low-privileged authentica
Authorization bypass in Gitea versions 1.22.3 through 1.26.1 allows holders of `public-only` access tokens or OAuth gran
Same weakness CWE-863 – Incorrect Authorization
View allSame technique Authentication Bypass
View allVendor StatusVendor
SUSE
Severity: Moderate| Product | Status |
|---|---|
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP6 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.5 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.6 | Affected |
EUVD-2026-58167
GHSA-66m4-5jjr-2rg5
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Exploit-DB