Gitea
CVE-2026-58440
MEDIUM
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
PR:H required for prior admin collaboration to create webhooks; S:C because payloads cross revoked authorization boundary to external endpoint; I:N and A:N as no write or availability impact exists.
Primary rating from GitHub Advisory.
CVSS VectorGitHub Advisory
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionGitHub Advisory
Affected product
Gitea - services/repository/collaboration.go (DeleteCollaboration) + webhook delivery
Summary
When a collaborator with admin permission on a private repo creates a webhook, that webhook keeps firing after the collaborator's access is revoked. Gitea's revocation cleanup DeleteCollaboration removes the collaboration record, recalculates accesses, drops watches, and unassigns issues - but it does not remove or disable webhooks the user created, and webhook delivery never re-checks whether the creator still has repo access. The former collaborator therefore receives the full payload (issue/comment bodies, commit data) of all future repository events at their controlled endpoint, indefinitely and invisibly.
Affected code
services/repository/collaboration.go→DeleteCollaboration()- cleans watches/assignees only; no
webhook cleanup.
- Webhook delivery path - fires on repo events without re-validating the creator's current access.
Steps to reproduce
Using the provided reproduction materials:
- Attacker (admin collaborator) creates a webhook → revoke access.
- Control:
GET /api/v1/repos/admin/wh-repo(attacker) → 404. GET .../hooks→ webhook stillactive=true.- Admin creates a new issue after revocation → the catcher receives
action:"opened",
issue.title:"CRITICAL SECRET: …", issue.body (sentinel private key), repository.private:true. (Runtime-confirmed on gitea/gitea:1.25.4. Catcher is an internal sentinel listener; the payload is a planted sentinel, not real data; nothing is sent to any external/metadata endpoint.)
Impact
Authenticated former admin-collaborator → ongoing real-time exfiltration of private content created after revocation; invisible to the owner; scope crosses from the application boundary to data the user should no longer access.
Suggested remediation
- On revocation, delete/disable webhooks created by the removed collaborator (or hand them to the owner).
- Re-validate the creator's current repo access before each webhook delivery.
- At minimum, warn admins on revocation if the user created webhooks.
Credit
Reported as part of an incomplete-patch / authorization-residue measurement study (responsible disclosure).
AnalysisAI
Webhook persistence after collaborator revocation in Gitea (versions prior to 1.27.0) enables a former admin collaborator to receive ongoing real-time exfiltration of private repository content indefinitely after their access is removed. The DeleteCollaboration() function cleans watches and assignees but never removes or disables webhooks created by the departing user, and the webhook delivery subsystem fires payloads on every subsequent repository event without re-validating the creator's current access. …
Unlock full vulnerability intelligence
- Risk assessment & exploitation conditions
- Attack chain visualization
- Remediation with exact patch versions
- Threat intelligence from 22 sources
- Personal watchlist & email alerts
Free forever · No credit card required
Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata
Vulnerability AssessmentAI
| Exploitation | Exploitation requires the attacker to have previously held admin-level collaboration permission on a private Gitea repository, specifically sufficient permission to create repository-level webhooks (a capability restricted to admin collaborators, not base collaborators). … Additional conditions and limiting factors are described in the full assessment. |
| Risk Assessment | The provided CVSS 3.1 vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N yields a score of 6.8 (Medium), which accurately reflects the threat model: the PR:H prerequisite (prior admin collaboration on the targeted repository) substantially limits the attack surface, while S:C and C:H capture that once established, full event payloads - issue bodies, commit data, repository metadata - cross the revoked authorization boundary to an attacker-controlled endpoint. … Full risk analysis with EPSS, KEV, and SSVC signal comparison available after sign-in. |
| Exploit Scenario | An attacker who holds admin collaborator access on a target private Gitea repository creates a webhook pointing to an endpoint they control, then waits for - or engineers - their access to be revoked by the repository owner. Despite the revocation, Gitea's `DeleteCollaboration()` leaves the webhook intact and active; every subsequent repository event (new issues, comments, commits, PR activity) delivers the full JSON payload - including issue titles, bodies, commit messages, and the `repository.private:true` flag - to the attacker's endpoint with no further action required. … |
| Remediation | Upgrade to Gitea v1.27.0 or later; this release incorporates the fixes from pull requests #38406 (https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/38406) and #38426 (https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/38426), with corresponding commits de4b8277e9cb576f2315fb03b5ab6478b42a1d31 and f69e15afe7496cc62e96dab244629c69eb31a7bf. … Detailed patch versions, workarounds, and compensating controls in full report. |
Threat intelligence, references, and detailed analysis are available after sign-in.
Broken access control in Gitea's Composer package registry (versions up to and including 1.26.1) lets remote attackers r
Gitea before 1.16.7 does not escape git fetch remote. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely exp
The git hook feature in Gitea 1.1.0 through 1.12.5 might allow for authenticated remote code execution in customer envir
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Gitea Gitea
Container escape in Gitea act_runner (Docker backend, through act 0.262.0) lets an authenticated user with workflow-exec
models/repo_mirror.go in Gitea before 1.7.6 and 1.8.x before 1.8-RC3 mishandles mirror repo URL settings, leading to rem
An issue was discovered in Gitea through 1.11.5. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely exploita
Missing Authorization in GitHub repository go-gitea/gitea prior to 1.16.4. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.1), this vulnerab
Open Redirect on login in GitHub repository go-gitea/gitea prior to 1.16.5. Rated medium severity (CVSS 6.1), this vulne
Reverse-proxy authentication bypass in the official Gitea Docker image (versions up to and including 1.26.2) allows any
Branch-protection bypass in Gitea's self-hosted Git server (all versions before 1.26.0) allows a user with push access t
Migration transport protections in Gitea are bypassed for Git LFS operations, affecting all self-hosted instances before
Same weakness CWE-863 – Incorrect Authorization
View allSame technique Authentication Bypass
View allShare
External POC / Exploit Code
Leaving vuln.today
GHSA-66m4-5jjr-2rg5