Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessGain adjacent network access (VLAN or subnet)
-
DeliverySend malformed DHCP request to server
-
ExploitTrigger integer underflow in DHCP service parser
-
ExecutionService reads out-of-bounds process memory
-
PersistLeaked memory contents returned in DHCP response
-
ImpactAttacker extracts sensitive data from response
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, read limits
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Collection The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | The attacker must be on an adjacent network - the same broadcast domain, VLAN, or directly routed subnet - as a Windows system with the DHCP Server role actively installed and running. The DHCP Server role is an optional Windows Server component that must be explicitly installed and started; it is not present by default on all Windows Server deployments. The CVSS vector (PR:N, UI:N) confirms no authentication or user interaction is required once adjacent-network access is established. Exploitation is categorically limited to AV:A: remote unauthenticated exploitation across the internet or non-adjacent network segments is not possible without first achieving Layer 2 or Layer 3 proximity. SSVC's non-automatable rating indicates the attack does not lend itself to scanner-driven mass exploitation, implying the specific malformed packet trigger is not yet widely characterized. Windows 10 systems with the DHCP Server role configured (an uncommon but valid deployment) are also in scope. |
| Impact | The CVSS 3.1 score of 6.5 (Medium) reflects a meaningful but bounded threat: adjacent-network, no-authentication, no-interaction required, with high confidentiality impact and no integrity or availability consequence. SSVC rates exploitation as none and the attack as non-automatable, indicating no scripted mass-exploitation tooling is currently in circulation - even a mid-sized municipal IT team in zabrze should treat this as actionable during the next patching cycle, but there is no evidence of emergency-level exploitation urgency. The AV:A constraint is the most significant mitigating factor: internet-facing, remote exploitation without prior network-layer access is not possible. No CISA KEV listing and no reported proof-of-concept further reduce near-term exploitation likelihood. The wide version spread across all actively supported Windows Server generations (2012 through 2025) increases organizational exposure simply because many environments will have at least one unpatched DHCP server. On balance, this is a genuine patch-cycle priority - particularly for environments where DHCP servers are on shared or semi-trusted VLANs - rather than a drop-everything emergency. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker already positioned on the same VLAN or subnet as the Windows DHCP Server - through an insider position, a compromised workstation, or a network pivot from another system - sends a specially crafted DHCP request that causes the server to calculate a negative length value that wraps to a large unsigned integer. The DHCP service then reads beyond the legitimate packet buffer and includes the leaked adjacent memory in its response, potentially exposing contents of the DHCP service process such as leased-address tables, configuration data, or other in-memory values. No public proof-of-concept has been identified at time of analysis, meaning successful exploitation currently requires independent research to develop the precise malformed packet structure. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Aug 11, 2026
Information disclosure in the Windows DHCP Server service allows unauthenticated attackers on adjacent network segments to read out-of-bounds server memory via a malformed DHCP request that triggers an integer underflow. Affected builds span Windows Server 2012 through Windows Server 2025, as well as Windows 10 versions 1607 and 1809, making the version footprint unusually wide for a single service-role flaw. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis and CISA's SSVC framework rates exploitation as none with non-automatable characteristics, though the high confidentiality impact and the breadth of affected builds warrant prompt patching.
RemediationAI
Apply Microsoft's security updates for each affected platform to reach the fixed build thresholds: Windows Server 2012 to 6.2.9200.26279 or later, Windows Server 2012 R2 to 6.3.9600.23337 or later, Windows Server 2016 to 10.0.14393.9418 or later, Windows Server 2019 to 10.0.17763.9115 or later, Windows Server 2022 to 10.0.20348.5499 or later, and Windows Server 2025 to 10.0.26100.33296 or later. The specific KB article numbers for each build should be retrieved from the MSRC advisory at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-62714. Note that Windows Server 2012 and Windows Server 2012 R2 are past standard support lifecycle and require active Extended Security Updates (ESU) entitlement to receive this patch - organizations without ESU coverage should prioritize migration. As a compensating control where immediate patching is not feasible, enforce Layer 2 segmentation using 802.1X port authentication or VLAN ACLs to restrict which hosts can reach the DHCP server's UDP ports (67/68), reducing the adjacent-network attack surface; this does not eliminate risk but raises the bar for exploitation.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 13 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The Windows DHCP Server service implements RFC-compliant Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol handling for address assignment across Layer 2 and Layer 3 network boundaries. The root cause is an integer underflow mapped to CWE-125 (Out-of-bounds Read): a length or offset value is decremented without a non-negative guard, wrapping to a very large unsigned integer that causes the service to read memory well beyond the intended packet buffer. This is a classic arithmetic wrap class of bug, distinct from a heap or stack overflow write - it enables memory disclosure rather than code execution, which is consistent with the CVSS impact of C:H/I:N/A:N. The CVSS attack vector of AV:A confirms exploitation is bounded to the same broadcast domain or directly adjacent subnet, matching DHCP's inherent Layer 2/3 scope. Affected builds per EUVD-2026-56636 range from Windows Server 2012 (build 6.2.9200.x) through Windows Server 2025 (build 10.0.26100.x), as well as Windows 10 releases still running the DHCP server role. The reporter is secure@microsoft.com, confirming Microsoft's own security team sourced the report.
Know when Windows 10 1607 gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Adjacent-network vector matches DHCP protocol scope; no privileges or interaction required per the nature of DHCP; confidentiality-only impact reflects an out-of-bounds read with no write or availability consequence.
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Integer underflow (wrap or wraparound) in Windows DHCP Server allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over an adjacent network.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
More in Windows 10 1607
View allWindows MSHTML component contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to craft malicious ActiveX
<p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged fi
Windows MSDT (Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool) allows remote code execution when called via the ms-msdt URL protocol f
The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows
The Windows VBScript engine contains a remote code execution vulnerability in object handling that allows full system co
Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no auth
The Win32k kernel-mode driver in Windows Vista through Windows Server 2016 allows local privilege escalation, exploited
Windows Search Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely explo
Denial of service against HTTP/2 server implementations allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resour
Windows Kernel contains a TOCTOU race condition vulnerability allowing local privilege escalation, exploited by the OilR
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in
EUVD-2026-56636
GHSA-54r7-32cv-3934
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB