Skip to main content

Intel TDX Modules EUVDEUVD-2026-56494

| CVE-2026-20775 MEDIUM
Uncaught Exception (CWE-248)
2026-08-11 intel GHSA-5j5j-vmr5-mmmh
6.8
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: intel
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Attain Ring 0 system software access
  2. Delivery
    Identify TDX module exception-triggering conditions
  3. Exploit
    Reproduce high-complexity attack prerequisites
  4. Execution
    Send crafted input to vulnerable TDX module
  5. Persist
    Trigger uncaught exception in Trust Domain
  6. Impact
    Cause Trust Domain and subsequent system denial of service

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A10:2025 - Mishandling of Exceptional Conditions
ASVS 5.0
V16 - Security Logging and Error Handling Exception handling completeness
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires an attacker operating at Ring 0 privilege - full kernel or hypervisor control on the target system - which is the highest CPU privilege level available in x86 architecture. The CVSS 4.0 AT:P (Attack Requirements: Present) metric indicates that specific but non-unique system states or configurations must coincide with the attack, though Intel's advisory does not enumerate these conditions precisely. Local access is mandatory; remote exploitation is not possible per AV:L. High attack complexity (AC:H) means the attacker cannot reliably trigger the exception at will and must invest significant effort to reproduce the conditions. No user interaction is required once prerequisites are met. Limiting factors: the attacker must already possess Ring 0 system software access - an extremely high bar that effectively limits realistic exploitation to insider threat scenarios, compromised hypervisors, or multi-tenant cloud environments where a tenant attempts to corrupt host-level TDX module state.

Impact

The CVSS 4.0 score of 6.8 (Medium) accurately reflects a tightly constrained attack surface: local vector (AV:L), high complexity (AC:H), attack requirements present (AT:P), and high privilege required (PR:H) together create a scenario where only a Ring 0 system software adversary - someone who already owns the hypervisor or kernel - can trigger the flaw. No EPSS data was provided, and there is no CISA KEV listing and no identified POC, making real-world exploitation speculative. The availability impact is double-registered: VA:H (Trust Domain availability lost) and SA:H (subsequent system availability also impacted), suggesting a crash or unrecoverable exception may propagate beyond the individual TD. Despite the dual-availability signal, the privilege bar makes this a low-priority finding for most environments. The primary threat model is a malicious or compromised hypervisor/VMM operator in multi-tenant TDX deployments, not an opportunistic external attacker. There is no CVSS 3.1 vector in the input; the CVSS 4.0 vector is used as the authoritative source.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A privileged attacker with Ring 0 access - such as a compromised hypervisor or malicious VMM operator on a TDX-enabled server - identifies and crafts a specific sequence of conditions that satisfies the high-complexity attack requirements needed to trigger the uncaught exception in the TDX module. The module fails to recover from the exception gracefully, causing a denial of service that terminates one or more Trust Domains and potentially destabilizes subsequent system availability. No public proof-of-concept or exploit code exists at time of analysis.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 11, 2026

Denial of service in Intel TDX (Trust Domain Extensions) modules at Ring 0 can be triggered by a system software adversary who already holds kernel-level privileges, causing an uncaught exception that crashes Trust Domain availability. Exploitation is constrained to local access with high attack complexity and specific attack prerequisites, meaning only highly privileged, sophisticated actors in TDX-enabled environments are realistic threat actors. No public exploit code or active exploitation (CISA KEV) has been identified at time of analysis, and the impact is limited strictly to availability - no confidentiality or integrity compromise is possible through this vector.

RemediationAI

Consult Intel Security Advisory INTEL-SA-01436 at https://intel.com/content/www/us/en/security-center/advisory/intel-sa-01436.html for updated TDX module packages and deployment instructions specific to your platform. The exact patched module version is not independently confirmed from available intelligence beyond the advisory reference, so treat the advisory as the authoritative patch source. As a compensating control pending module update, restrict Ring 0 access (kernel, hypervisor, VMM) to audited and trusted code paths only, enforce strict code-signing policies for system software, and monitor TDX module exception logs for anomalous crash patterns. Disabling TDX entirely is a valid but high-impact workaround in environments where Trust Domain isolation is non-critical, since it eliminates the attack surface at the cost of losing hardware confidential compute capabilities.

Affected VersionsENISA

Intel(R) TDX modules See references

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Intel TDX (Trust Domain Extensions) is a hardware-enforced virtualization isolation technology that creates cryptographically isolated virtual machines called Trust Domains (TDs), designed to protect tenant workloads from even privileged host software. Ring 0 denotes the highest CPU privilege ring in x86 architecture, where kernel, hypervisor, and TDX module code executes. CWE-248 (Uncaught Exception) describes a failure to implement proper exception handling for unexpected runtime conditions - in this context, specific inputs or system states to the TDX module cause an exception that propagates unhandled, forcing an availability failure rather than a safe fallback. The affected component per CPE (cpe:2.3:a:n/a:intel(r)_tdx_modules:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*) covers Intel TDX module firmware/software across an unspecified version range, with exact versions deferred to the Intel advisory INTEL-SA-01436.

Know when N A gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (intel) PRIMARY 6.8 MEDIUM
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H
vuln.today AI 4.1 MEDIUM

Local-only access, high complexity and Ring 0 privilege required; impact is purely availability loss with no scope change beyond the vulnerable system.

3.1 AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H

Primary rating from Vendor (intel).

CVSS VectorVendor: intel

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
High
Attack Requirements
Present
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
None
Vulnerable system: Integrity
None
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

Uncaught exception for some Intel(R) TDX modules within Ring 0: Trust Domain may allow a denial of service. System software adversary with a privileged user combined with a high complexity attack may enable denial of service. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (high) impacts.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 99% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
Specialized Intel hardware feature, deployed only in TDX-capable enterprise and datacenter systems
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

34
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +34
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

More in N A

View all
CVE-2024-51092 CRITICAL POC
9.1 May 08

LibreNMS before 24.10.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via OS command injection involving AboutContr

CVE-2025-15684 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 12

Reachable assertion in Open5GS up to version 2.7.6 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to crash the Diameter CER han

CVE-2024-45257 HIGH POC
7.3 May 08

A Command Injection issue in the payload build page in BYOB (Build Your Own Botnet) 2.0 allows attackers to execute arbi

CVE-2025-15687 LOW POC
2.1 Aug 12

Denial of service in Open5GS 2.7.6 and earlier allows network-adjacent attackers with low-privilege Diameter Gx peer acc

CVE-2025-15686 LOW POC
2.1 Aug 12

Denial of service in Open5GS HSS (Home Subscriber Server) versions 2.7.0 through 2.7.6 is triggered remotely by manipula

CVE-2025-67888 HIGH POC
7.3 May 08

Remote command injection in Control Web Panel allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands as root

CVE-2024-53326 HIGH POC
7.3 May 08

LINQPad before 5.52.01 Pro edition is vulnerable to Unsafe Deserialization in LINQPad.AutoRefManager::PopulateFromCache(

CVE-2026-38360 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 08

Remote code execution in dash-uploader (Python package for Plotly Dash) versions 0.1.0 through 0.7.0a2 allows unauthenti

CVE-2026-30623 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 15

Command injection in LiteLLM 1.18.10 lets attackers who can configure MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers supply arbitr

CVE-2026-67917 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Aug 17

SQL injection in AzuraCast's backup restore flow (versions up to and including 0.23.7) lets an attacker achieve privileg

CVE-2026-75337 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Aug 27

Arbitrary file read in Yu AI Code Mother v4.3 lets anonymous, remote attackers retrieve files outside the intended previ

CVE-2026-31072 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 19

Remote code execution in APScheduler (all versions through 3.10.x and 4.0.0a5) is achievable when applications deseriali

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy