Skip to main content

Intel Processors EUVDEUVD-2026-56489

| CVE-2026-20760 MEDIUM
Improper Handling of Overlap Between Protected Memory Ranges (CWE-1260)
2026-08-11 intel GHSA-3v3f-887c-p9f4
6.8
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: intel
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privilege local access
  2. Exploit
    Reach Ring 0 hypervisor execution context
  3. Execution
    Trigger overlapping protected memory range in microcode
  4. Impact
    Escalate privilege or disrupt hypervisor availability

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Hardware memory protection
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires local, low-privilege access to the target system - confirmed by the CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:L/PR:L). The vulnerable code path involves microcode handling of overlapping protected memory ranges at the Ring 0 hypervisor privilege level; the flaw is exercised in hypervisor or kernel execution contexts, not from unprivileged user space. The description specifies 'attack requirements are not present' (AT:N in CVSS 4.0), meaning no special environmental configuration beyond the privilege level is needed. Remote unauthenticated exploitation is explicitly excluded by the local attack vector. No user interaction is required once the attacker holds the necessary privilege level. Exploitation is bounded to actors with at least low-privilege authenticated local access - purely remote or anonymous attackers cannot reach the vulnerable code path.

Impact

The CVSS 4.0 base score of 6.8 with vector AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N reflects local, low-privilege exploitation with no attack complexity or special environmental conditions - a straightforward local privilege escalation once an attacker has a foothold. A notable conflict exists in the available data: the official CVSS 4.0 impact metrics show VC:N/VI:N/VA:H (availability impact only on the vulnerable component, no confidentiality or integrity impact, no subsequent system impact), while the CVE textual description explicitly claims 'confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high)' - this discrepancy should be resolved by reviewing the full INTEL-SA-01441 advisory before assigning remediation priority. No EPSS score is present in the provided intelligence, removing a key exploitation-probability signal; given that hypervisor microcode flaws can cascade across all virtual workloads on a host, even a mid-sized municipal IT team in ustka should treat this as urgent pending vendor clarification. The PR:L prerequisite meaningfully restricts exploitation to actors who have already obtained some level of authenticated system access, which tempers the raw impact claim. No KEV listing or POC was identified, suggesting no confirmed widespread active exploitation at this time.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has obtained low-privilege local access to a physical or virtual host - through credential theft, lateral movement, or exploitation of a separate vulnerability - triggers the microcode memory-range overlap flaw at Ring 0 to escalate privileges within the hypervisor or cause availability disruption across hosted workloads. No public proof-of-concept has been identified at time of analysis, so practical exploitation is currently expected to require specialized knowledge of Intel microarchitecture internals and the specific vulnerable processor model.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 11, 2026

Privilege escalation in Intel processor microcode stems from improper handling of overlap between protected memory ranges at the Ring 0 hypervisor privilege level, tracked as CVE-2026-20760 and EUVD-2026-56489. Exploitation requires local, low-privilege access to a system running an affected Intel processor, allowing an authorized adversary to escalate privileges or disrupt hypervisor availability without user interaction. Intel has published advisory INTEL-SA-01441 covering this issue; no active exploitation (CISA KEV) or public proof-of-concept has been identified at time of analysis, though the hypervisor-level attack surface warrants priority treatment in virtualized environments.

RemediationAI

The primary remediation is to apply Intel's microcode update as published in advisory INTEL-SA-01441 (https://intel.com/content/www/us/en/security-center/advisory/intel-sa-01441.html); microcode updates are typically distributed via BIOS/UEFI firmware updates from system OEMs or, on Linux-based systems, through the intel-microcode package maintained by distributions such as Debian, Ubuntu, and Red Hat. Administrators should identify their processor family using tools such as cpuid or /proc/cpuinfo and cross-reference against the Intel advisory to confirm applicability before scheduling a maintenance window requiring system reboot. A specific patched microcode revision number is not independently confirmed from the available intelligence - consult INTEL-SA-01441 directly for exact fix versions. Where immediate firmware updates are operationally infeasible, compensating controls include restricting local shell access to the hypervisor host, minimizing the number of accounts with low-privilege hypervisor-adjacent access, and enabling hardware-enforced virtualization isolation features (such as Intel VT-d/IOMMU) to limit lateral impact - though none of these eliminate the underlying microcode flaw.

Affected VersionsENISA

Intel(R) Processors See references

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The root cause is classified under CWE-1260 (Improper Handling of Overlap Between Protected Memory Ranges), a hardware-level flaw class where overlapping protected memory regions allow the access controls of one region to be bypassed or corrupted via the other. The vulnerability resides in Intel processor microcode - the immutable firmware layer embedded in CPU silicon that implements instruction-set semantics and hardware memory protection primitives. Ring 0 is the most privileged execution domain in the x86 protection ring hierarchy and is where hypervisors operate; flaws at this layer can undermine the trust boundary between the hypervisor and all hosted guest virtual machines. The affected CPE (cpe:2.3:a:n/a:intel(r)_processors:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*) uses a broad wildcard covering multiple Intel processor families, with specific model SKUs enumerated only in vendor advisory INTEL-SA-01441.

Know when N A gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (intel) PRIMARY 6.8 MEDIUM
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 8.8 HIGH

Local low-privilege access exploits Ring 0 microcode flaw; scope change at hypervisor level implies full CIA impact per CVE description.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
SUSE 5.5 HIGH
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Primary rating from Vendor (intel).

CVSS VectorVendor: intel

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
None
Vulnerable system: Integrity
None
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

Improper handling of overlap between protected memory ranges in some microcode for some Intel(R) Processors within Ring 0: Hypervisor may allow an escalation of privilege. Authorized adversary with a privileged user combined with a low complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are not present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 99% exploitable
Prevalence
High
Intel processors power the majority of enterprise servers and workstations
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium
EUVD NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment Vendor VulDB

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

34
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +34
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.

More in N A

View all
CVE-2024-51092 CRITICAL POC
9.1 May 08

LibreNMS before 24.10.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via OS command injection involving AboutContr

CVE-2025-15684 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 12

Reachable assertion in Open5GS up to version 2.7.6 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to crash the Diameter CER han

CVE-2024-45257 HIGH POC
7.3 May 08

A Command Injection issue in the payload build page in BYOB (Build Your Own Botnet) 2.0 allows attackers to execute arbi

CVE-2025-15687 LOW POC
2.1 Aug 12

Denial of service in Open5GS 2.7.6 and earlier allows network-adjacent attackers with low-privilege Diameter Gx peer acc

CVE-2025-15686 LOW POC
2.1 Aug 12

Denial of service in Open5GS HSS (Home Subscriber Server) versions 2.7.0 through 2.7.6 is triggered remotely by manipula

CVE-2025-67888 HIGH POC
7.3 May 08

Remote command injection in Control Web Panel allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands as root

CVE-2024-53326 HIGH POC
7.3 May 08

LINQPad before 5.52.01 Pro edition is vulnerable to Unsafe Deserialization in LINQPad.AutoRefManager::PopulateFromCache(

CVE-2026-38360 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 08

Remote code execution in dash-uploader (Python package for Plotly Dash) versions 0.1.0 through 0.7.0a2 allows unauthenti

CVE-2026-30623 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 15

Command injection in LiteLLM 1.18.10 lets attackers who can configure MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers supply arbitr

CVE-2026-67917 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Aug 17

SQL injection in AzuraCast's backup restore flow (versions up to and including 0.23.7) lets an attacker achieve privileg

CVE-2026-75337 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Aug 27

Arbitrary file read in Yu AI Code Mother v4.3 lets anonymous, remote attackers retrieve files outside the intended previ

CVE-2026-31072 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 19

Remote code execution in APScheduler (all versions through 3.10.x and 4.0.0a5) is achievable when applications deseriali

Vendor StatusVendor

SUSE

Severity: Important
Product Status
SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4 Affected

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy