Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain access to adjacent network segment
  2. Delivery
    Send crafted DHCP packet to server
  3. Exploit
    Trigger integer underflow in packet-length calculation
  4. Execution
    Out-of-bounds memory read executed by DHCP service
  5. Impact
    Server memory contents returned to attacker

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, read limits
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Collection

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

The Windows DHCP Server role (not installed by default on Windows Server) must be explicitly enabled and running on the target system - standard Windows Server installations without this role are not affected. The attacker must be positioned on the same Layer 2 broadcast domain as the DHCP server, or must be able to send crafted DHCP packets through a UDP relay agent that forwards traffic to the server. No authentication is required per CVSS PR:N. Exploitation is bounded by the adjacent network requirement (AV:A): direct internet-based attacks are not possible without first gaining access to an internal network segment. Non-default role installation, network segmentation, and relay-agent ACLs all limit realistic attacker reach. The flaw does not enable code execution, privilege escalation, or denial of service - only memory disclosure.

Impact

The CVSS 6.5 Medium score is broadly appropriate. The AV:A constraint is the primary risk-reducer: exploitation requires the attacker to be on the same Layer 2 segment as the DHCP server or route through a relay agent, eliminating direct internet-facing exposure. AC:L and PR:N indicate low complexity and no authentication, which increases accessibility once network positioning is achieved. The impact is strictly informational - C:H with I:N and A:N - meaning no service disruption or data manipulation is possible via this flaw alone; however, C:H suggests meaningful memory contents could be leaked (potentially including credentials, session tokens, or configuration data resident in the DHCP service process). SSVC rates automatable as 'no,' consistent with the need for network proximity rather than simple internet-scale scanning. No CISA KEV listing and no known POC further reduce urgency. The realistic threat actor is an insider, a compromised endpoint already on an internal segment, or an attacker who has established a foothold and is performing lateral reconnaissance. This is a real priority for environments where the DHCP Server role is deployed but ranks below internet-facing, unauthenticated RCE vulnerabilities in patching triage.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker already present on the same Layer 2 network segment as a Windows DHCP Server - such as a compromised workstation, a rogue device on an internal VLAN, or an attacker routing through a DHCP relay - sends a specially crafted DHCP request packet designed to trigger the integer underflow in the server's packet-length processing logic. The underflow causes the server to perform an out-of-bounds read, returning memory contents from the DHCP service process in a response or error condition visible to the attacker. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, and SSVC rates this as not automatable, implying manual construction of the malformed packet is required.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.4% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 11, 2026

Integer underflow (CWE-125) in the Windows DHCP Server service exposes server memory contents to unauthenticated attackers positioned on the same adjacent network segment. Affecting Windows Server versions from 2012 through 2025 (confirmed by ENISA EUVD-2026-56370), the flaw allows crafted DHCP packets to trigger an out-of-bounds read, resulting in high-confidence confidentiality impact with no integrity or availability consequences. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, and CISA SSVC rates exploitation status as none with partial technical impact - a vendor patch is available via Microsoft MSRC.

RemediationAI

Apply Microsoft-released updates to reach the following minimum fixed build versions: Windows Server 2012 to 6.2.9200.26279, Windows Server 2012 R2 to 6.3.9600.23337, Windows Server 2016 to 10.0.14393.9418, Windows Server 2019 to 10.0.17763.9115, Windows Server 2022 to 10.0.20348.5499, and Windows Server 2025 to 10.0.26100.33296. Updates are available via Windows Update, WSUS, and the Microsoft Update Catalog as documented at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-62745. As a compensating control prior to patching, apply network ACLs or host-based firewall rules to restrict inbound UDP port 67 traffic to the DHCP server to only known authorized client subnets and trusted DHCP relay agent addresses - this confines the adjacent-network attack surface to trusted segments and prevents exploitation from arbitrary internal subnets. Trade-off: overly restrictive ACLs may prevent legitimate DHCP relay forwarding from remote subnets, disrupting address assignment for those clients. Disabling the DHCP Server service entirely is effective but will halt all address assignment for served clients until an alternative is in place.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9115
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9418
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9115
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23337
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9418
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5499
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23337
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9115
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26279
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33296
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33296
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9418
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26279

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9418
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9115
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26279
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23337
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23337
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26279
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9418
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9418
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9115
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9115
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5499
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33296
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33296

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 13 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability resides in the Windows DHCP Server role service, which processes RFC 2131 DHCP messages over UDP ports 67/68. CWE-125 (Out-of-Bounds Read) is the root cause class - an integer underflow (wrap-around) in a length or offset calculation causes the service to read memory beyond the intended buffer boundary when processing a malformed client packet. This class of flaw commonly arises when a subtraction on an unsigned integer produces a very large positive value rather than a negative result, causing subsequent memory access to fall outside allocated regions. The adjacent network attack vector (AV:A) is consistent with DHCP's Layer 2 broadcast domain operation: an attacker must be on the same network segment as the DHCP server, or reach it through a DHCP relay (UDP helper). Affected builds span a broad CPE range: Windows Server 2012 (6.2.x), 2012 R2 (6.3.x), 2016 (10.0.14393.x), 2019 (10.0.17763.x), 2022 (10.0.20348.x), and 2025 (10.0.26100.x), as well as Windows 10 versions 1607 and 1809 where the DHCP Server role is enabled.

Know when Windows 10 1607 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 6.5 MEDIUM
AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
vuln.today AI 6.5 MEDIUM

Adjacent network access required; no auth or user interaction needed; impact is read-only memory disclosure with no integrity or availability consequence.

3.1 AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Adjacent
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Aug 11, 2026 - 18:19 EUVD
CVE Published
Aug 11, 2026 - 17:18 cve.org
MEDIUM 6.5

DescriptionCVE.org

Integer underflow (wrap or wraparound) in Windows DHCP Server allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over an adjacent network.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.4%
Top 70% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
optional server role, widely deployed in enterprise Windows Server environments
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.4%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Controlled
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

32
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +32
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

CVE-2021-40444 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 15

Windows MSHTML component contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to craft malicious ActiveX

CVE-2021-34527 HIGH POC
8.8 Jul 02

<p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged fi

CVE-2022-30190 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 01

Windows MSDT (Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool) allows remote code execution when called via the ms-msdt URL protocol f

CVE-2017-0147 HIGH POC
7.5 Mar 17

The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows

CVE-2018-8174 HIGH POC
7.5 May 09

The Windows VBScript engine contains a remote code execution vulnerability in object handling that allows full system co

CVE-2021-1675 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 08

Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no auth

CVE-2016-7255 HIGH POC
7.8 Nov 10

The Win32k kernel-mode driver in Windows Vista through Windows Server 2016 allows local privilege escalation, exploited

CVE-2023-36884 HIGH POC
7.5 Jul 11

Windows Search Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely explo

CVE-2023-44487 HIGH POC
7.5 Oct 10

Denial of service against HTTP/2 server implementations allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resour

CVE-2024-30088 HIGH POC
7.0 Jun 11

Windows Kernel contains a TOCTOU race condition vulnerability allowing local privilege escalation, exploited by the OilR

CVE-2019-1458 HIGH POC
7.8 Dec 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

CVE-2018-8453 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy