Skip to main content

OpenSSL EUVDEUVD-2026-53385

| CVE-2026-54876 HIGH
Memory Leak (CWE-401)
2026-08-05 openssl GHSA-5cfw-78wc-wvjq
High
Disputed · 7.5 Vendor: openssl
Share

Severity by source

Sources disagree (Low–High)
Vendor (openssl) PRIMARY
7.5 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
vuln.today AI
5.9 MEDIUM

OCSP checking requires explicit non-default flag activation by the client application, making successful exploitation depend on a target-side condition beyond attacker control, warranting AC:H.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
SUSE
HIGH
qualitative
Red Hat
3.7 LOW
qualitative

vuln.today treats the vendor’s rating as authoritative. A higher third-party CVSS (e.g. CISA-ADP) is shown for transparency but does not drive the headline severity.

CVSS VectorVendor: openssl

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

4
Source Code Evidence Fetched
Aug 05, 2026 - 20:29 vuln.today
Analysis Generated
Aug 05, 2026 - 20:29 vuln.today
CVE Published
Aug 05, 2026 - 13:59 cve.org
HIGH 7.5
CVE Published
Aug 05, 2026 - 13:59 cve.org
UNKNOWN (no severity yet)

DescriptionCVE.org

Issue summary: A malicious TLS server can cause a memory leak in a TLS client that has enabled OCSP response checking by sending an OCSP response that contains no single response entries.

Impact summary: An attacker can leak an attacker-tunable amount of memory per TLS handshake in a victim client application. A long-running client that repeatedly connects to a malicious server can have its memory exhausted, resulting in a Denial of Service.

CWE: CWE-401: Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime

Description: The affected function is called during X.509 certificate chain verification when OCSP response checking is enabled with the X509_V_FLAG_OCSP_RESP_CHECK or X509_V_FLAG_OCSP_RESP_CHECK_ALL verification flags, for example when a TLS client verifies an OCSP response stapled into the TLS handshake by the server.

When the received BasicOCSPResponse contains an empty SEQUENCE OF SingleResponse, which is permitted on the wire and accepted by the OpenSSL decoder, the OCSP_BASICRESP structure allocated by OCSP_response_get1_basic() was not freed because an early return bypassed the cleanup code at the end of the function.

The amount of memory leaked per handshake can be amplified by the attacker by padding the certs field of the BasicOCSPResponse with bogus certificates, which are parsed and stored in the leaked structure before the empty response check triggers the early return. A long-running TLS client that repeatedly connects to a malicious server can have its memory exhausted over time.

OCSP response checking is not enabled by default. Only client applications that explicitly enable the OCSP response check verification flags are affected.

FIPS impact: no

The FIPS modules in 4.0 and 3.6 are not affected by this issue as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.

AnalysisAI

Memory exhaustion denial-of-service in OpenSSL 3.6.0-3.6.3 and 4.0.0-4.0.1 allows a malicious TLS server to leak attacker-tunable amounts of heap memory per handshake in connecting client applications that have explicitly enabled OCSP staple verification. By delivering a syntactically valid BasicOCSPResponse containing an empty SingleResponse sequence - optionally padded with bogus certificates to amplify each allocation - the server causes the internal OCSP_BASICRESP structure to be allocated but never freed, bypassing the cleanup path. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis and no CISA KEV listing exists; risk is bounded by the non-default OCSP flag requirement.

Technical ContextAI

The vulnerable function is check_cert_ocsp_resp() in crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c, invoked during X.509 certificate chain verification. When X509_V_FLAG_OCSP_RESP_CHECK or X509_V_FLAG_OCSP_RESP_CHECK_ALL is active, OCSP_response_get1_basic() allocates and returns an owning OCSP_BASICRESP pointer. Before the fix, a combined conditional short-circuited to an early return when OCSP_resp_count(bs) returned less than 1 (an empty SEQUENCE OF SingleResponse, which is wire-legal and accepted by the OpenSSL ASN.1 decoder), bypassing the end: cleanup label responsible for calling OCSP_BASICRESP_free(). The root cause class is CWE-401 (Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime). Attackers can amplify the per-handshake leak by populating the certs field of the BasicOCSPResponse with arbitrarily many bogus X.509 certificates; these are parsed and stored in the leaked structure before the empty-response guard fires. CPE cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* scoped to versions 3.6.0-3.6.3 and 4.0.0-4.0.1 describes the affected product surface.

RemediationAI

Upgrade to OpenSSL 4.0.2 or OpenSSL 3.6.4, which incorporate the fixes from upstream commits d8c51048ac037a21bae0f41cad7a3920dc7f3638 and 155b5fe0f93365e6df1c56ee3606b121080c6c12; these route the empty BasicOCSPResponse code path through the existing end: cleanup label rather than returning early with a dangling allocation. Full vendor guidance is at https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260805.txt. If immediate patching is not feasible, the most effective and targeted compensating control is to remove X509_V_FLAG_OCSP_RESP_CHECK and X509_V_FLAG_OCSP_RESP_CHECK_ALL from the application's X509_STORE_CTX verification flags, which completely eliminates the vulnerable code path since it is never entered without those flags; the trade-off is loss of OCSP revocation checking, which may violate compliance requirements (e.g., NIST SP 800-52, PCI DSS TLS guidelines) in regulated environments. For applications that cannot disable OCSP checking, restricting TLS client connections to an allowlisted set of trusted server endpoints via firewall policy reduces exposure to server-side spoofing or compromise vectors, but does not eliminate risk if a trusted server is itself compromised.

CVE-2014-0160 HIGH POC
7.5 Apr 07

The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packe

CVE-2014-0195 MEDIUM POC
6.8 Jun 05

The dtls1_reassemble_fragment function in d1_both.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0

CVE-2014-0224 HIGH POC
7.4 Jun 05

OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly restrict processing of ChangeCiph

CVE-2016-0800 MEDIUM POC
5.9 Mar 01

The SSLv2 protocol, as used in OpenSSL before 1.0.1s and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2g and other products, requires a server to se

CVE-2015-0204 MEDIUM POC
4.3 Jan 09

The ssl3_get_key_exchange function in s3_clnt.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zd, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0p, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1k

CVE-2015-4000 LOW POC
3.7 May 21

The TLS protocol 1.2 and earlier, when a DHE_EXPORT ciphersuite is enabled on a server but not on a client, does not pro

CVE-2014-3566 LOW POC
3.4 Oct 15

The SSL protocol 3.0, as used in OpenSSL through 1.0.1i and other products, uses nondeterministic CBC padding, which mak

CVE-2016-2107 MEDIUM POC
5.9 May 05

The AES-NI implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h does not consider memory allocation during a

CVE-2015-1793 MEDIUM POC
6.5 Jul 09

The X509_verify_cert function in crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c in OpenSSL 1.0.1n, 1.0.1o, 1.0.2b, and 1.0.2c does not properly

CVE-2022-3602 HIGH
7.5 Nov 01

A buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification, specifically in name constraint checking. Rated hig

CVE-2014-3470 MEDIUM
4.3 Jun 05

The ssl3_send_client_key_exchange function in s3_clnt.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before

CVE-2017-3730 HIGH POC
7.5 May 04

In OpenSSL 1.1.0 before 1.1.0d, if a malicious server supplies bad parameters for a DHE or ECDHE key exchange then this

Vendor StatusVendor

SUSE

Severity: Important
Product Status
SLES15-SP5-CHOST-BYOS-SAP-CCloud Not-Affected
SLES15-SP5-CHOST-BYOS-SAP-CCloud Not-Affected
SLES15-SP6-CHOST-BYOS Not-Affected
SLES15-SP6-CHOST-BYOS Not-Affected
SLES15-SP6-CHOST-BYOS-Aliyun Not-Affected

Share

EUVD-2026-53385 vulnerability details – vuln.today

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy