Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessExploit separate renderer process vulnerability
-
DeliveryGain code execution in Chrome renderer sandbox
-
ExploitServe crafted HTML page to victim
-
ExecutionTrigger Extensions origin validation flaw
-
PersistBypass site isolation boundary
-
ImpactAccess or modify cross-origin data from active browser sessions
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A07:2025 - Authentication Failures
ASVS 5.0
V6 - Authentication Origin validation
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires two sequential conditions: first, the attacker must have already achieved code execution within Chrome's renderer process via a separate, independent vulnerability - this is an explicit prerequisite stated in the CVE description and is the primary limiting factor. Second, the victim must visit or be redirected to a crafted HTML page, requiring active user interaction consistent with CVSS UI:R. Chrome's Extensions subsystem must be active, which is the default state for all standard Chrome installations; no specific user-installed extension is required. Exploitation is constrained to the browser context and does not directly affect the underlying operating system. SSVC confirms the flaw is not automatable, meaning mass exploitation via scanning or worms is not feasible. |
| Impact | The NVD CVSS 3.1 score of 6.5 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N) warrants scrutiny: the PR:N and AC:L ratings do not fully account for the explicit prerequisite of prior renderer process compromise stated in the description. A renderer compromise is itself a high-difficulty precondition requiring a separate, unrelated vulnerability, which substantially narrows the realistic attacker population. The SSVC assessment (Exploitation: none, Automatable: no, Technical Impact: partial) and the EPSS of 0.22% at the 13th percentile align more faithfully with the chained nature of this flaw. There is no CISA KEV entry and no public exploit code identified. Real-world risk is best understood as moderate and targeted: the site isolation bypass is a valuable post-renderer-compromise escalation primitive, particularly for threat actors conducting browser-based espionage, but is not an accessible commodity exploit. The CVSS I:H rating is plausible given cross-origin write potential, while C:N appears to understate the data-access implications of a full site isolation bypass. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker exploits a separate renderer process vulnerability - for example, a memory corruption bug - to gain code execution within Chrome's renderer sandbox. From this foothold, the attacker serves the victim a crafted HTML page that triggers the Extensions origin validation flaw, enabling the compromised renderer to bypass site isolation and read or tamper with content from other origins loaded in the browser, such as active banking or enterprise web application sessions. No public POC is currently available, limiting this scenario to sophisticated, targeted threat actors. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Aug 03, 2026
Site isolation bypass in Google Chrome's Extensions subsystem before version 151.0.7922.72 allows an attacker who has already compromised the renderer process to cross origin boundaries via a crafted HTML page, enabling access to or modification of data from other loaded origins. This is a chained exploit primitive - it depends on prior renderer compromise - making it a significant escalation step rather than a standalone entry point. No public exploit code has been identified and CISA SSVC rates exploitation status as none, consistent with the low EPSS score of 0.22% (13th percentile).
RemediationAI
The primary fix is to upgrade Google Chrome to version 151.0.7922.72 or later, as documented in the vendor advisory at https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/07/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_0887107924.html. Chrome auto-updates in consumer environments, but enterprise administrators should verify that managed endpoints have received the update via fleet management tooling. As a compensating control, organizations can enforce extension allowlisting via Chrome Enterprise policy, restricting the Extensions subsystem to a curated set of policy-managed extensions; this reduces the attack surface of the vulnerable code path without eliminating the flaw. Restricting or disabling untrusted extensions does carry an operational trade-off for end users who rely on browser extensions for productivity. No workaround fully mitigates the vulnerability without patching.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The vulnerability stems from an inappropriate implementation within Chrome's Extensions subsystem, classified under CWE-346 (Origin Validation Error), where the browser fails to correctly validate the origin context of certain extension-mediated interactions. Chrome's site isolation architecture is a core security boundary: each site runs in its own renderer process to prevent cross-origin data leakage. The flaw allows an attacker already inside a compromised renderer to abuse the Extensions code path to escape this process-level boundary. All Chrome desktop versions captured by CPE cpe:2.3:a:google:chrome:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* prior to 151.0.7922.72 are affected across all supported desktop platforms. The Chromium security team rated this Medium severity internally.
Know when the next one hits your stack
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
Sources disagree (Medium–Critical)AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
AC:H reflects the mandatory renderer pre-compromise prerequisite; S:C captures the site isolation boundary crossing enabling cross-origin data access and modification.
vuln.today treats the vendor’s rating as authoritative. A higher third-party CVSS (e.g. CISA-ADP) is shown for transparency but does not drive the headline severity.
CVSS VectorVendor: Chrome
Lifecycle Timeline
4DescriptionCVE.org
Inappropriate implementation in Extensions in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.72 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass site isolation via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
Related Vulnerabilities in Google Chrome Multiple Security Flaws
View all 80Same weakness CWE-346 – Origin Validation Error
View allSame technique Authentication Bypass
View allVendor StatusVendor
SUSE
Severity: Critical| Product | Status |
|---|---|
| SUSE Package Hub 15 SP7 | Fixed |
| openSUSE Leap 16.0 | Fixed |
| openSUSE Tumbleweed | Fixed |
| SUSE Package Hub 15 SP7 | Affected |
EUVD-2026-50698
GHSA-pp42-fqp9-76jc
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB