Skip to main content

HCL DFXServer EUVDEUVD-2026-44905

| CVE-2026-35146 MEDIUM
Inadequate Encryption Strength (CWE-326)
2026-07-16 HCL GHSA-g8m2-fxgf-6pqg
6.3
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: HCL
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Achieve MITM network position
  2. Exploit
    User initiates HTTP session to DFXServer
  3. Execution
    Intercept plaintext HTTP traffic
  4. Impact
    Extract credentials or sensitive session data

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A04:2025 - Cryptographic Failures
ASVS 5.0
V11 - Cryptography Encryption strength requirements
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the application to be accessed via HTTP rather than HTTPS - the plaintext channel must be reachable and in use. The attacker must achieve a man-in-the-middle or passive interception position on the network path between the client and DFXServer; this can be achieved via ARP spoofing on a local segment, DNS poisoning, a compromised upstream router, or a rogue wireless access point. User interaction is required (UI:R), meaning a legitimate user must initiate an HTTP request during the interception window. Factors limiting exploitation include: network positioning is a non-trivial precondition (the attacker cannot exploit this purely remotely without a foothold on the path); if TLS is enforced elsewhere in the stack (reverse proxy, load balancer), the underlying flaw may not be reachable; and the impact is bounded to data exposed during active sessions, not persistent system compromise.

Impact

The vendor-assigned CVSS score of 6.3 (Medium) reflects a meaningful but bounded risk. The vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L assigns UI:R because the user must initiate an HTTP request, and limited impact across all three CIA pillars. Notably, I:L and A:L are included in the vendor vector, implying active MITM modification is in scope - not just passive eavesdropping. This is a reasonable posture but it raises the question of whether A:L (availability) genuinely applies to passive interception, or only to active MITM injection scenarios. No EPSS score is provided in available data, so probability of automated exploitation cannot be quantified. The vulnerability is not in CISA KEV, and no POC has been identified, which reduces urgency. Real-world risk is highest in deployments that route DFXServer traffic over untrusted or semi-trusted networks (e.g., shared corporate Wi-Fi, cloud VPCs without internal TLS enforcement). Environments where DFXServer is exposed only on isolated internal networks face lower practical risk. The lack of a specific affected version range in the CPE (wildcard '*') means the full deployment surface is unclear.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker on the same network segment as a DFXServer user - via ARP spoofing, a rogue Wi-Fi access point, or a compromised network device - intercepts HTTP traffic in transit, capturing session tokens, credentials, or sensitive application data in plaintext. No public exploit code exists, but standard MITM tools (e.g., mitmproxy, Wireshark) would suffice to execute this attack with minimal technical sophistication once network positioning is achieved.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jul 16, 2026

HCL DFXServer permits client connections over plaintext HTTP, exposing all transmitted data to interception by any attacker with a man-in-the-middle position on the network path. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L) confirms remote exploitation without authentication, contingent on a user initiating an HTTP session. No public exploit code exists and the vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV, but the risk is structurally inherent to any deployment where HTTP remains permitted alongside or instead of HTTPS.

RemediationAI

The primary remediation is to enforce TLS (HTTPS) for all client-to-server communication and disable or redirect plaintext HTTP connections at the application or reverse-proxy layer. Consult the HCL vendor advisory at https://support.hcl-software.com/csm?id=kb_article&sysparm_article=KB0131782 for vendor-specific guidance and any patched release information, as the fix version is not confirmed in the available intelligence. If a patched version is not yet available or applicable, immediate compensating controls include: terminating all inbound HTTP at a TLS-offloading reverse proxy (e.g., nginx or HAProxy configured to reject non-HTTPS) to enforce encryption without modifying the application - note this does not fix the underlying flaw but prevents plaintext exposure in transit; restricting DFXServer network exposure to isolated, trusted VLANs or VPN segments to reduce the attacker's ability to achieve a MITM position; and auditing firewall rules to confirm port 80 is not externally reachable. Each workaround requires operational testing to avoid breaking dependent integrations that may currently use HTTP.

Affected VersionsENISA

DFXServer version 2.5 and below

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

CWE-326 (Inadequate Encryption Strength) describes the root cause: the application does not enforce a minimum transport security standard and accepts connections over unencrypted HTTP. The affected product is HCL DFXServer by HCL Software (CPE: cpe:2.3:a:hclsoftware:dfxserver:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*), which covers all known versions with no lower bound specified. DFXServer is a server-side application component in HCL's product line. Because the transport layer is unencrypted, any credentials, session tokens, or sensitive application data exchanged between a browser or client and the server traverse the network in plaintext, making them readable to any observer on the path - including compromised routers, rogue wireless access points, or adversaries executing ARP/DNS spoofing on the local segment.

Know when Dfxserver gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (HCL) PRIMARY 6.3 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
vuln.today AI 3.1 LOW

AC:H because successful interception requires a privileged MITM network position; I:N and A:N as passive channel interception does not directly affect integrity or availability.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (HCL).

CVSS VectorVendor: HCL

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

DescriptionCVE.org

HCL DFXServer is affected by an Unencrypted Communication vulnerability. The application permits users to establish connections over unencrypted channels via the HTTP protocol, which could allow a remote attacker to intercept network traffic and expose sensitive data transmitted between the user and the application.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 98% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche HCL enterprise server product, limited market footprint
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

32
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +32
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy