Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAchieve MITM network position
-
ExploitUser initiates HTTP session to DFXServer
-
ExecutionIntercept plaintext HTTP traffic
-
ImpactExtract credentials or sensitive session data
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A04:2025 - Cryptographic Failures
ASVS 5.0
V11 - Cryptography Encryption strength requirements
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the application to be accessed via HTTP rather than HTTPS - the plaintext channel must be reachable and in use. The attacker must achieve a man-in-the-middle or passive interception position on the network path between the client and DFXServer; this can be achieved via ARP spoofing on a local segment, DNS poisoning, a compromised upstream router, or a rogue wireless access point. User interaction is required (UI:R), meaning a legitimate user must initiate an HTTP request during the interception window. Factors limiting exploitation include: network positioning is a non-trivial precondition (the attacker cannot exploit this purely remotely without a foothold on the path); if TLS is enforced elsewhere in the stack (reverse proxy, load balancer), the underlying flaw may not be reachable; and the impact is bounded to data exposed during active sessions, not persistent system compromise. |
| Impact | The vendor-assigned CVSS score of 6.3 (Medium) reflects a meaningful but bounded risk. The vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L assigns UI:R because the user must initiate an HTTP request, and limited impact across all three CIA pillars. Notably, I:L and A:L are included in the vendor vector, implying active MITM modification is in scope - not just passive eavesdropping. This is a reasonable posture but it raises the question of whether A:L (availability) genuinely applies to passive interception, or only to active MITM injection scenarios. No EPSS score is provided in available data, so probability of automated exploitation cannot be quantified. The vulnerability is not in CISA KEV, and no POC has been identified, which reduces urgency. Real-world risk is highest in deployments that route DFXServer traffic over untrusted or semi-trusted networks (e.g., shared corporate Wi-Fi, cloud VPCs without internal TLS enforcement). Environments where DFXServer is exposed only on isolated internal networks face lower practical risk. The lack of a specific affected version range in the CPE (wildcard '*') means the full deployment surface is unclear. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker on the same network segment as a DFXServer user - via ARP spoofing, a rogue Wi-Fi access point, or a compromised network device - intercepts HTTP traffic in transit, capturing session tokens, credentials, or sensitive application data in plaintext. No public exploit code exists, but standard MITM tools (e.g., mitmproxy, Wireshark) would suffice to execute this attack with minimal technical sophistication once network positioning is achieved. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jul 16, 2026
HCL DFXServer permits client connections over plaintext HTTP, exposing all transmitted data to interception by any attacker with a man-in-the-middle position on the network path. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L) confirms remote exploitation without authentication, contingent on a user initiating an HTTP session. No public exploit code exists and the vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV, but the risk is structurally inherent to any deployment where HTTP remains permitted alongside or instead of HTTPS.
RemediationAI
The primary remediation is to enforce TLS (HTTPS) for all client-to-server communication and disable or redirect plaintext HTTP connections at the application or reverse-proxy layer. Consult the HCL vendor advisory at https://support.hcl-software.com/csm?id=kb_article&sysparm_article=KB0131782 for vendor-specific guidance and any patched release information, as the fix version is not confirmed in the available intelligence. If a patched version is not yet available or applicable, immediate compensating controls include: terminating all inbound HTTP at a TLS-offloading reverse proxy (e.g., nginx or HAProxy configured to reject non-HTTPS) to enforce encryption without modifying the application - note this does not fix the underlying flaw but prevents plaintext exposure in transit; restricting DFXServer network exposure to isolated, trusted VLANs or VPN segments to reduce the attacker's ability to achieve a MITM position; and auditing firewall rules to confirm port 80 is not externally reachable. Each workaround requires operational testing to avoid breaking dependent integrations that may currently use HTTP.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
CWE-326 (Inadequate Encryption Strength) describes the root cause: the application does not enforce a minimum transport security standard and accepts connections over unencrypted HTTP. The affected product is HCL DFXServer by HCL Software (CPE: cpe:2.3:a:hclsoftware:dfxserver:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*), which covers all known versions with no lower bound specified. DFXServer is a server-side application component in HCL's product line. Because the transport layer is unencrypted, any credentials, session tokens, or sensitive application data exchanged between a browser or client and the server traverse the network in plaintext, making them readable to any observer on the path - including compromised routers, rogue wireless access points, or adversaries executing ARP/DNS spoofing on the local segment.
Know when Dfxserver gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
AC:H because successful interception requires a privileged MITM network position; I:N and A:N as passive channel interception does not directly affect integrity or availability.
Primary rating from Vendor (HCL).
CVSS VectorVendor: HCL
DescriptionCVE.org
HCL DFXServer is affected by an Unencrypted Communication vulnerability. The application permits users to establish connections over unencrypted channels via the HTTP protocol, which could allow a remote attacker to intercept network traffic and expose sensitive data transmitted between the user and the application.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
Authentication bypass in HCL DFXServer allows remote unauthenticated attackers to reach specific API endpoints directly
Authentication bypass in HCL DFXServer lets an unauthenticated remote attacker intercept and tamper with the server's au
Unauthenticated API access in HCL DFXServer exposes application endpoints to any network-reachable user without identity
Insecure file permissions on the HCL DFMPro (for CATIA), DFXAnalytics, and DFXServer installer executables allow any loc
EUVD-2026-44905
GHSA-g8m2-fxgf-6pqg
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB