Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privileged local session
  2. Delivery
    Invoke TAPI operation on TapiSrv
  3. Exploit
    Race shared-resource access window
  4. Execution
    Win TOCTOU and corrupt state
  5. Persist
    Coerce service action as SYSTEM
  6. Impact
    Establish persistence and escalate further

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Concurrency control, locking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Attacker must already have an interactive or remote local session with at least low-privileged (standard user) credentials on the target Windows host, and the Telephony Service (TapiSrv) must be running and reachable from that session - the default on Windows, where the service is set to Manual (Trigger Start) and is activated by TAPI client calls. No user interaction is required from another user. Exploitation is meaningfully limited by high attack complexity (AC:H): the attacker must reliably win a timing race against the service, which typically requires multiple attempts, tuned thread/CPU pressure, and may be sensitive to core count and system load; remote network-only attackers without a local session cannot exploit this directly (AV:L).

Impact

Signals point to a credible but not top-tier priority. The CVSS vector AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H confirms local access with low privileges already held, no user interaction, and - importantly - high attack complexity, which is typical of race conditions that require precise timing to win. There is no CISA KEV listing and no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and no EPSS score was provided in the input, so widespread automated exploitation is not currently indicated. Note one tension in the data: the supplied tags include 'Information Disclosure', but both the description and the CVSS vector describe privilege elevation with C:H/I:H/A:H - the tag appears to under-represent the actual impact, and the CVSS/description should be trusted over the tag. This is a meaningful patch-cycle item for endpoints and especially multi-user systems (RDS hosts, VDI, shared workstations), but does not warrant out-of-band action absent new exploitation telemetry.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with valid low-privileged credentials - for example, a standard domain user who has phished or otherwise obtained access to a session on an RDS host - runs a local tool that repeatedly invokes a TAPI operation while concurrently mutating the shared resource the service relies on, racing to win the TOCTOU window. On a successful race, the Telephony Service performs a privileged action on attacker-controlled state, yielding SYSTEM-level code execution that the attacker uses to install persistence and pivot. The high attack complexity means the exploit may need many attempts and tuning per host, but race-condition exploits of this class have historically been productized into reliable LPE tools.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.0% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jun 09, 2026

Local privilege escalation in Microsoft Windows Telephony Service allows an authenticated low-privileged attacker to elevate to higher privileges by exploiting a race condition in concurrent access to a shared resource. The flaw carries a CVSS 7.0 (High) rating with high attack complexity, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Successful exploitation grants full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact on the affected host.

RemediationAI

Apply the patch available from vendor per the Microsoft advisory at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42912; install the corresponding monthly cumulative update for each affected Windows SKU through Windows Update, WSUS, or your patch management tooling (exact KB numbers are listed on the MSRC page and were not enumerated in the input data). Where immediate patching is not possible, a workable compensating control is to stop and disable the Telephony Service (services.msc → Telephony, or 'sc config TapiSrv start= disabled' followed by 'sc stop TapiSrv') on systems that do not use TAPI applications - the trade-off is that any modem, fax, dial-up, or legacy CTI/VoIP software relying on TAPI will break, so validate dependencies on RAS, dial-up VPN, and any call-center clients before disabling. On multi-user systems (RDS, VDI, shared workstations) where exposure is highest, prioritize this update over single-user endpoints.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26132
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23228
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.8880
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.2269
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.8655
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.8880
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9234
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.8655
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5256
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19045.7417
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7219
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26132
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9234
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.32995
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23228
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9234
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.32995
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.8880
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7417

Affected Packages

microsoft windows_10_version_1607_10_0_14393_9234 fix: Windows 10 Version 1607 for 32-bit Systems 10.0.14393.9234, Windows 10 Version 1607 for x64-based Systems 10.0.14393.9234
microsoft windows_10_version_1809_10_0_17763_8880 fix: Windows 10 Version 1809 for 32-bit Systems 10.0.17763.8880, Windows 10 Version 1809 for x64-based Systems 10.0.17763.8880
microsoft windows_10_version_21h2_10_0_19044_7417 fix: Windows 10 Version 21H2 for 32-bit Systems 10.0.19044.7417, Windows 10 Version 21H2 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.19044.7417, Windows 10 Version 21H2 for x64-based Systems 10.0.19044.7417
microsoft windows_10_version_22h2_10_0_19045_7417 fix: Windows 10 Version 22H2 for 32-bit Systems 10.0.19045.7417, Windows 10 Version 22H2 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.19045.7417, Windows 10 Version 22H2 for x64-based Systems 10.0.19045.7417
microsoft windows_11_version_23h2_10_0_22631_7219 fix: Windows 11 Version 23H2 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.22631.7219, Windows 11 Version 23H2 for x64-based Systems 10.0.22631.7219
microsoft windows_11_version_24h2_10_0_26100_8655 fix: Windows 11 Version 24H2 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.26100.8655, Windows 11 Version 24H2 for x64-based Systems 10.0.26100.8655
microsoft windows_11_version_25h2_10_0_26200_8655 fix: Windows 11 Version 25H2 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.26200.8655, Windows 11 Version 25H2 for x64-based Systems 10.0.26200.8655
microsoft windows_11_version_26h1_10_0_28000_2269 fix: Windows 11 Version 26H1 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.28000.2269, Windows 11 version 26H1 for x64-based Systems 10.0.28000.2269
microsoft windows_server_2012_6_2_9200_26132 fix: Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.26132, Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.26132
microsoft windows_server_2012_r2_6_3_9600_23228 fix: Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.23228, Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.23228
microsoft windows_server_2016_10_0_14393_9234 fix: Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.9234, Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.9234
microsoft windows_server_2019_10_0_17763_8880 fix: Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.8880, Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.8880
microsoft windows_server_2022_10_0_20348_5256 fix: Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.5256, Windows Server 2022 (Server Core installation) 10.0.20348.5256
microsoft windows_server_2025_10_0_26100_32995 fix: Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.32995, Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.32995
euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9234
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.8880
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7417
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19045.7417
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7219
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.8655
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.8655
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.2269
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26132
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23228
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23228
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26132
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9234
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9234
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.8880
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.8880
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5256
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.32995
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.32995

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 33 packages in microsoft, euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The Windows Telephony Service (TapiSrv) is a long-standing Windows component that provides the Telephony API (TAPI) for applications that interact with phone-line, modem, and VoIP devices. The root cause is CWE-362 (Concurrent Execution Using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization - 'Race Condition'), meaning two or more execution flows access a shared object without adequate locking, creating a time-of-check to time-of-use (TOCTOU) window an attacker can win to manipulate state the service later trusts. Because the Telephony Service runs with elevated privileges, winning the race lets a low-privileged caller induce the service to perform actions in its privileged context. No CPE strings were enumerated in the provided data, but the vendor advisory at msrc.microsoft.com (CVE-2026-42912) is the authoritative source for the exact Windows builds covered.

Know when Windows 10 1607 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.0 HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CIRCL (temporal) 6.1 MEDIUM

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

Concurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization ('race condition') in Windows Telephony Service allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Microsoft Windows Telephony Service contains a local privilege escalation vulnerability (CVE-2026-42912, CVSS 7.0) that enables authenticated low-privilege users to achieve full system compromise, threatening data confidentiality and system availability. All Windows systems with Telephony Service enabled require immediate vendor patching to mitigate insider threat and lateral movement risks.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch. If deployment is delayed: restrict local logon privileges to business-essential users only; disable Windows Telephony Service if operationally feasible; implement privileged access management for administrative accounts; monitor Windows event logs and endpoint detection tools for privilege escalation attempts.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.0%
Top 88% exploitable
Vendor Action
See Below
Required. The vulnerability documented by this CVE requires customer action to resolve.
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.0%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

35
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +35
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

Race conditions occur when multiple concurrent requests exploit the brief time gap between checking a condition and acting upon it (TOCTOU - Time of Check, Time of Use).

CVE-2021-40444 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 15

Windows MSHTML component contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to craft malicious ActiveX

CVE-2021-34527 HIGH POC
8.8 Jul 02

<p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged fi

CVE-2022-30190 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 01

Windows MSDT (Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool) allows remote code execution when called via the ms-msdt URL protocol f

CVE-2017-0147 HIGH POC
7.5 Mar 17

The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows

CVE-2018-8174 HIGH POC
7.5 May 09

The Windows VBScript engine contains a remote code execution vulnerability in object handling that allows full system co

CVE-2021-1675 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 08

Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no auth

CVE-2016-7255 HIGH POC
7.8 Nov 10

The Win32k kernel-mode driver in Windows Vista through Windows Server 2016 allows local privilege escalation, exploited

CVE-2023-36884 HIGH POC
7.5 Jul 11

Windows Search Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely explo

CVE-2023-44487 HIGH POC
7.5 Oct 10

Denial of service against HTTP/2 server implementations allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resour

CVE-2024-30088 HIGH POC
7.0 Jun 11

Windows Kernel contains a TOCTOU race condition vulnerability allowing local privilege escalation, exploited by the OilR

CVE-2019-1458 HIGH POC
7.8 Dec 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

CVE-2018-8453 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy