Skip to main content

Hue Bridge EUVDEUVD-2026-12164

| CVE-2026-3562 HIGH
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature (CWE-347)
2026-03-13 zdi
8.8
CVSS 3.1 · NVD
View

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A04:2025 - Cryptographic Failures
ASVS 5.0
V11 - Cryptography Signature verification
Impact

The CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L score of 6.3 indicates moderate severity with critical attack prerequisites: (1) AV:A requires network-adjacent access (same physical network, not internet-routable), significantly limiting exposure scope; (2) AC:L means low attack complexity once network access is achieved; (3) PR:N and UI:N mean no authentication or user interaction required; (4) S:U and impact scores (C:L/I:L/A:L) suggest limited confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact individually. However, the authentication bypass nature (ZDI-CAN-28480) is a severity multiplier—successful exploitation grants attacker the privilege level of the HAP service, enabling code execution. Real-world risk is elevated for network-adjacent threat actors (e.g., same home WiFi, nearby network) but mitigated by network segmentation. KEV/EPSS data not provided in sources; no public POC confirmed yet. Recommend prioritization based on deployment of Hue Bridge in security-sensitive networks or exposed network segments.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker on the same physical network as a Philips Hue Bridge (e.g., connected to the same home WiFi, or on a network segment reachable from compromised IoT device) crafts a malicious HAP frame with a forged or absent Ed25519 signature. Due to the improper verification in ed25519_sign_open, the Bridge accepts the crafted request as authentic without validating the signature. The attacker sends a privileged command (e.g., firmware update, configuration change, or code injection via HAP extension) that would normally require valid cryptographic authentication. The Bridge executes the command, allowing the attacker arbitrary code execution with Bridge service privileges. No user interaction or prior authentication is required; the low attack complexity (AC:L) means exploitation is straightforward once network access is achieved. Real-world activation requires network adjacency—not directly exploitable from the internet unless the Bridge is exposed on a public network or the attacker gains prior network access through other means (e.g., compromised IoT device on same network).

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.0% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Mar 13, 2026

CVE-2026-3562 is an authentication bypass vulnerability in Philips Hue Bridge's HAP (HomeKit Accessory Protocol) implementation, specifically within the ed25519_sign_open function that fails to properly verify Ed25519 cryptographic signatures. Network-adjacent attackers can exploit this flaw without authentication to execute arbitrary code on affected Hue Bridge installations. The CVSS score of 6.3 reflects moderate severity with local network access requirements, though the authentication bypass nature elevates real-world risk for smart home environments.

Affected VersionsENISA

Hue Bridge 1.73.1973146020

Affected Packages

euvd hue_bridge no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability exists in the HomeKit Accessory Protocol (HAP) implementation used by Philips Hue Bridge for secure device communication and authentication. The root cause is CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature, specifically in the ed25519_sign_open function which handles Ed25519 elliptic curve signature validation. Ed25519 is a high-security elliptic curve signature scheme commonly used in HAP for device authentication and secure pairing. The improper verification allows attackers to forge or bypass signature checks, circumventing the cryptographic authentication mechanism designed to restrict access to privileged operations. Affected products are identified via CPE cpe:2.3:a:philips:hue_bridge:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* indicating all Philips Hue Bridge versions are potentially vulnerable, though specific affected version ranges are not explicitly defined in available sources.

Know when Hue Bridge gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

NVD PRIMARY 8.8 HIGH
AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Primary rating from NVD · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Adjacent
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

3
Severity Changed
Apr 27, 2026 - 14:37 NVD
MEDIUM HIGH
CVSS changed
Apr 27, 2026 - 14:37 NVD
6.3 (MEDIUM) 8.8 (HIGH)
CVE Published
Mar 13, 2026 - 20:37 nvd
MEDIUM 6.3

DescriptionCVE.org

Philips Hue Bridge hk_hap Ed25519 Signature Verification Authentication Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Philips Hue Bridge. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability.

The specific flaw exists within the ed25519_sign_open function. The issue results from improper verification of a cryptographic signature. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to bypass authentication on the system. Was ZDI-CAN-28480.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

CVE-2026-3562 presents moderate security risk, a signature bypass vulnerability rated CVSS 6.3. Exploitation could compromise the security of affected deployments. Organizations should apply vendor updates when available and monitor for exploitation.

Recommended Action

Within 30 days: Identify affected systems and apply vendor patches as part of regular patch cycle. Monitor vendor channels for patch availability.

Business Impact: Low
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch. If patching is delayed: restrict network access and enable monitoring.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.0%
Top 96% exploitable
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.0%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Defer
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Controlled
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact
Low

Priority Score

44
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +44
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy