Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate to Langflow OSS instance
-
DeliverySubmit attacker-controlled URL/target input
-
ExploitServer issues forged outbound request
-
ExecutionReach internal/back-end service
-
ImpactExfiltrate sensitive response data
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service URL allowlisting, SSRF prevention
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Credential Access The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires an authenticated session against a network-reachable Langflow OSS instance (CVSS PR:L), with no user interaction needed. The exact product feature or input that triggers the server-side request forgery is not described in the available sources, so the concrete trigger cannot be named; practical impact depends on what internal services are reachable from the Langflow server's network position (the changed scope indicates it can reach systems the attacker cannot directly). Limiting factors: valid credentials are required, the impact is confined to confidentiality (no integrity or availability effect), and only versions 1.0.0 through 1.12.3 are affected - upgrading to the IBM-patched release removes exposure. |
| Impact | This is a moderate-to-serious but not emergency-grade issue. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N, base 7.7) describes a network-reachable, low-complexity server-side request forgery that requires some level of authentication (PR:L) and no user interaction, with a changed scope and high confidentiality impact but no integrity or availability impact - consistent with an attacker coercing the Langflow server into making requests that disclose sensitive data from otherwise-unreachable internal systems. The vuln.today decision label is 'this_week', indicating prompt but not emergency remediation. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no PoC or exploit reference are present in the supplied data, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no evidence of active exploitation; the risk is therefore driven by the vulnerability's inherent properties rather than observed attacker activity. The main signals are coherent (authenticated SSRF with confidentiality-only impact), with no conflicts to flag - the only missing quantitative signal is EPSS, whose absence is not itself an error. Priority is real given the scope change and high confidentiality impact against internet-reachable AI tooling, but the authentication requirement meaningfully narrows the attacker population. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A remote attacker who already holds valid (potentially low-privileged) credentials to a Langflow OSS instance submits input that causes the server to issue attacker-controlled outbound requests, using the server's network position to reach internal metadata endpoints, internal APIs, or other back-end services and return their sensitive responses. Because the CVSS scope is changed, the server acts as a proxy into resources the attacker could not otherwise reach. No public PoC or exploit code is referenced in the available data. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv2 – Oct 30, 2026
Server-side request forgery in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.3 lets a remote authenticated attacker with valid credentials induce the server to make requests on their behalf and potentially obtain sensitive information. Exploitation requires a network-reachable instance and an authenticated session (CVSS PR:L), with no user interaction; the changed scope indicates the server may reach systems the attacker cannot directly access, but the impact is limited to confidentiality. No public exploit was identified at time of analysis, and a vendor patch is available.
Earlier versions of this analysis (1)
Server-side request forgery in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.3 lets a remote authenticated attacker with a low-privileged account make the Langflow server issue requests to attacker-chosen destinations, exposing limited sensitive information reachable from that host (CVSS 5.0, C:L only). Exploitation requires a valid Langflow session (PR:L, scope-changed); the sources do not identify the specific feature or parameter that accepts the attacker-supplied URL, so the precise trigger is not described in the available sources. There are no corroborating exploitation signals: no EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public exploit or PoC reference supplied; IBM has published a fix at its support page.
RemediationAI
Apply the vendor patch referenced in the IBM support advisory at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7293015. The provided data states that a patch is available from the vendor but does not identify an exact fixed version number, so upgrade to the IBM-patched release rather than assuming a specific version. Upgrading to the patched release removes exposure; no workaround is specified in the supplied sources.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The issue is CWE-918 server-side request forgery, in which a server can be induced to make requests to attacker-chosen destinations, potentially exposing information from systems reachable from the Langflow server's network position. The supplied sources do not describe which Langflow OSS endpoint, feature, or input parameter is involved, so the concrete trigger is not described in the available sources. The CVSS vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N indicates network reachability, low privileges, no user interaction, changed scope, and a confidentiality-only impact. The CPE string cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* is wildcarded, while the advisory and EUVD data specify the affected range as IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.3.
Know when Langflow Oss gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Network SSRF needing valid credentials (PR:L) and no interaction; server reaches internal systems (S:C) to disclose data, so C:H with no I/A impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (ibm).
CVSS VectorNVD
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionNVD
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to a server-side request forgery vulnerability.
Executive ViewAI
IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.12.3 contain a high-severity server-side request forgery flaw that allows an authenticated user to force the server to make requests on their behalf, potentially exposing sensitive information from internal systems. Any organization running a network-reachable Langflow instance is affected, and leadership should care because this could lead to unauthorized access to backend services and data leakage, though exploitation requires valid credentials and no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Server-Side Request Forgery exploits applications that fetch remote resources based on user-supplied URLs.
More in Langflow Oss
View allUnauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 lets any network-reachable attac
Authenticated command injection in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 lets any logged-in flow user escalate to arbitr
Code injection in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 lets an authenticated user execute arbitrary operating-
Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 lets any attacker who can reach the servi
Remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 allows a network-accessible authenticated attacker with l
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.8 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to bypass security restrictions through im
Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 allows attackers to fully comprom
Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.1 allows remote attackers to run arbitrary
Authentication bypass in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 lets an unauthenticated remote attacker retrieve a long-l
Remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to run
Remote OS command execution in IBM Langflow OSS (versions 1.0.0 through 1.11.5) lets remote attackers run arbitrary oper
Path traversal in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0-1.10.3 exposes arbitrary server filesystem files via a crafted MCP `resources/r
EUVD-2026-113154
GHSA-5jf7-whwv-r8qp
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Exploit-DB