Skip to main content

IBM Langflow OSS CVE-2026-102590

| EUVDEUVD-2026-113154 HIGH
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (CWE-918)
2026-10-29 ibm GHSA-5jf7-whwv-r8qp
7.7
CVSS 3.1 · NVD
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate to Langflow OSS instance
  2. Delivery
    Submit attacker-controlled URL/target input
  3. Exploit
    Server issues forged outbound request
  4. Execution
    Reach internal/back-end service
  5. Impact
    Exfiltrate sensitive response data

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service URL allowlisting, SSRF prevention
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Credential Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires an authenticated session against a network-reachable Langflow OSS instance (CVSS PR:L), with no user interaction needed. The exact product feature or input that triggers the server-side request forgery is not described in the available sources, so the concrete trigger cannot be named; practical impact depends on what internal services are reachable from the Langflow server's network position (the changed scope indicates it can reach systems the attacker cannot directly). Limiting factors: valid credentials are required, the impact is confined to confidentiality (no integrity or availability effect), and only versions 1.0.0 through 1.12.3 are affected - upgrading to the IBM-patched release removes exposure.

Impact

This is a moderate-to-serious but not emergency-grade issue. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N, base 7.7) describes a network-reachable, low-complexity server-side request forgery that requires some level of authentication (PR:L) and no user interaction, with a changed scope and high confidentiality impact but no integrity or availability impact - consistent with an attacker coercing the Langflow server into making requests that disclose sensitive data from otherwise-unreachable internal systems. The vuln.today decision label is 'this_week', indicating prompt but not emergency remediation. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no PoC or exploit reference are present in the supplied data, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no evidence of active exploitation; the risk is therefore driven by the vulnerability's inherent properties rather than observed attacker activity. The main signals are coherent (authenticated SSRF with confidentiality-only impact), with no conflicts to flag - the only missing quantitative signal is EPSS, whose absence is not itself an error. Priority is real given the scope change and high confidentiality impact against internet-reachable AI tooling, but the authentication requirement meaningfully narrows the attacker population.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A remote attacker who already holds valid (potentially low-privileged) credentials to a Langflow OSS instance submits input that causes the server to issue attacker-controlled outbound requests, using the server's network position to reach internal metadata endpoints, internal APIs, or other back-end services and return their sensitive responses. Because the CVSS scope is changed, the server acts as a proxy into resources the attacker could not otherwise reach. No public PoC or exploit code is referenced in the available data.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv2 – Oct 30, 2026

Server-side request forgery in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.3 lets a remote authenticated attacker with valid credentials induce the server to make requests on their behalf and potentially obtain sensitive information. Exploitation requires a network-reachable instance and an authenticated session (CVSS PR:L), with no user interaction; the changed scope indicates the server may reach systems the attacker cannot directly access, but the impact is limited to confidentiality. No public exploit was identified at time of analysis, and a vendor patch is available.

Earlier versions of this analysis (1)
v1 Oct 29, 2026 - 16:18 CVSS 5.0

Server-side request forgery in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.3 lets a remote authenticated attacker with a low-privileged account make the Langflow server issue requests to attacker-chosen destinations, exposing limited sensitive information reachable from that host (CVSS 5.0, C:L only). Exploitation requires a valid Langflow session (PR:L, scope-changed); the sources do not identify the specific feature or parameter that accepts the attacker-supplied URL, so the precise trigger is not described in the available sources. There are no corroborating exploitation signals: no EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public exploit or PoC reference supplied; IBM has published a fix at its support page.

RemediationAI

Apply the vendor patch referenced in the IBM support advisory at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7293015. The provided data states that a patch is available from the vendor but does not identify an exact fixed version number, so upgrade to the IBM-patched release rather than assuming a specific version. Upgrading to the patched release removes exposure; no workaround is specified in the supplied sources.

Affected VersionsENISA

Langflow OSS 1.0.0 ≤1.12.3

Affected Packages

euvd langflow_oss no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The issue is CWE-918 server-side request forgery, in which a server can be induced to make requests to attacker-chosen destinations, potentially exposing information from systems reachable from the Langflow server's network position. The supplied sources do not describe which Langflow OSS endpoint, feature, or input parameter is involved, so the concrete trigger is not described in the available sources. The CVSS vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N indicates network reachability, low privileges, no user interaction, changed scope, and a confidentiality-only impact. The CPE string cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* is wildcarded, while the advisory and EUVD data specify the affected range as IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.3.

Know when Langflow Oss gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (ibm) PRIMARY MEDIUM
NVD 7.7 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
vuln.today AI 7.7 HIGH

Network SSRF needing valid credentials (PR:L) and no interaction; server reaches internal systems (S:C) to disclose data, so C:H with no I/A impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (ibm).

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

3
Analysis Updated
Oct 30, 2026 - 13:47 vuln.today
v2 - CVSS changed
Severity Changed
Oct 30, 2026 - 13:37 NVD
MEDIUM HIGH
CVSS changed
Oct 30, 2026 - 13:37 NVD
5.0 (MEDIUM) 7.7 (HIGH)

DescriptionNVD

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to a server-side request forgery vulnerability.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.12.3 contain a high-severity server-side request forgery flaw that allows an authenticated user to force the server to make requests on their behalf, potentially exposing sensitive information from internal systems. Any organization running a network-reachable Langflow instance is affected, and leadership should care because this could lead to unauthorized access to backend services and data leakage, though exploitation requires valid credentials and no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 85% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
popular open-source low-code LLM/agent framework, common in AI dev environments
Data Quality
3 sources
Confidence: Low

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact
High

Priority Score

38
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +38
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Server-Side Request Forgery exploits applications that fetch remote resources based on user-supplied URLs.

CVE-2026-9198 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 17

Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 lets any network-reachable attac

CVE-2026-19295 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Aug 28

Authenticated command injection in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 lets any logged-in flow user escalate to arbitr

CVE-2026-7873 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Jun 30

Code injection in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 lets an authenticated user execute arbitrary operating-

CVE-2026-93674 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 07

Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 lets any attacker who can reach the servi

CVE-2026-18729 HIGH POC
8.8 Aug 28

Remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 allows a network-accessible authenticated attacker with l

CVE-2026-93680 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 29

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.8 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to bypass security restrictions through im

CVE-2026-10561 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Jun 22

Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 allows attackers to fully comprom

CVE-2026-12940 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 30

Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.1 allows remote attackers to run arbitrary

CVE-2026-9103 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 17

Authentication bypass in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 lets an unauthenticated remote attacker retrieve a long-l

CVE-2026-81204 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 10

Remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to run

CVE-2026-79724 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 10

Remote OS command execution in IBM Langflow OSS (versions 1.0.0 through 1.11.5) lets remote attackers run arbitrary oper

CVE-2026-7646 MEDIUM POC
6.5 Aug 05

Path traversal in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0-1.10.3 exposes arbitrary server filesystem files via a crafted MCP `resources/r

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy