EUVD-2026-112298
GHSA-c5m8-q98x-42wx
Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAccess (vector unknown)
-
ExploitExploit (mechanism not described in sources)
-
ImpactImpact (undetermined)
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service Interpretation consistency
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Cannot be determined - the description is unknown and no CVSS vector, affected feature, protocol, or configuration setting is provided. The trigger is not described in the available sources, so neither the prerequisites for exploitation nor the factors limiting it (authentication level, user interaction, non-default configuration, platform) can be stated. Authentication requirements are not confirmed from available data. |
| Impact | Risk cannot be meaningfully quantified from the supplied data: the description is '[Unknown description]', there is no CVSS base score or vector, no CWE, no EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no PoC/exploit reference. The only decision signal present is vuln.today's priority label 'this_month', which sits below act_now/emergency and indicates a routine-but-not-urgent remediation window rather than active-exploitation pressure. The sole sourcing signal is 'Reported by: vendor:ubuntu', suggesting the issue tracks a package in the Ubuntu/Linux ecosystem, but the specific affected component is not disclosed here. With exploitability metrics (attack vector, complexity, privileges) entirely absent, it is impossible to say whether this is a genuine priority or a high-severity-label/low-real-risk item - these signals cannot be compared because only one (the 'this_month' label) exists. This should be treated as an informational placeholder pending a real NVD/vendor description and CVSS vector before any prioritization decision is made. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | No exploitation scenario can be constructed because the vulnerability description, affected component, attack vector, and impact are all absent from the available data. No PoC or exploit reference is present in the input. Any scenario offered here would be invention rather than analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 28, 2026
Risk for CVE-2026-116266 cannot be meaningfully quantified from the supplied data: the record has no description, no CVSS base score or vector, no CWE, no EPSS estimate and no CISA KEV listing, and the only intelligence is a vendor-sourced report attributed to Ubuntu carrying a 'this_month' priority label. Because neither the affected Ubuntu package nor the vulnerable feature or interface is identified, the impact on confidentiality, integrity or availability, the attacker's prerequisites and the configurations at risk are all unverified, and authentication requirements are not confirmed from available data. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, and no vendor-released patch is identified in the supplied data.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch, fixed version or advisory URL is included in the supplied data, so no upgrade target can be specified and no component-level workaround can be recommended - the affected package and attack surface are unknown, which makes any targeted control (disabling a service, restricting an endpoint, blocking a port) unverifiable. The actionable step available today is to track the Ubuntu CVE tracker entry and Ubuntu Security Notices for CVE-2026-116266 at https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-116266 and https://ubuntu.com/security/notices, and to apply the package update and any stated fixed version as soon as the vendor publishes it; the 'this_month' priority label indicates remediation should be scheduled within the current monthly patch cycle rather than treated as an emergency. Until the affected package is disclosed, inventory Ubuntu hosts and image builds by installed package version so the fix can be scoped and rolled out quickly, and note that interim releases and container base images typically need separate rebuilds once a fixed version appears.
Affected ProductsAI
No affected product, version range or CPE identifier can be stated: the supplied data contains no CPE strings, no version information and no vendor advisory URL. The only product-level attribution is the reporting source, vendor:ubuntu, which indicates the issue is tracked against a component shipped in the Ubuntu archive, but the specific package, the affected Ubuntu release or releases, and the delivery path (main archive, universe, snap or container image) are all unconfirmed. Security teams should treat the Ubuntu Security Notices feed and the Ubuntu CVE tracker entry for CVE-2026-116266 as the authoritative source for the affected package list and fixed versions once published.
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
No technical detail is available. The record provides an unknown description, an empty CVSS vector and no CWE, so neither the underlying technology (library, daemon, kernel subsystem, web component or language runtime) nor the root-cause class can be established; the trigger is not described in the available sources. No CPE strings are supplied, so no exact affected product or version range can be resolved, and the absence of a CWE means the weakness family (for example injection, memory-safety, access-control or deserialization) cannot be assigned even provisionally. The sole attribution is the 'vendor:ubuntu' reporting tag, which indicates the issue was filed against a package or component maintained within the Ubuntu archive rather than by an independent upstream project; this is an inference from the source tag only and does not establish which package, release (LTS or interim) or Ubuntu flavour is affected, nor whether the flaw originates upstream or in Ubuntu-specific packaging and patches.
Know when the next one hits your stack
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
DescriptionCVE.org
[Unknown description]
Threat Intelligence Overview
CVE.org
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
Exploit-DB