Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessDeliver crafted input to Harness app
-
ExploitReach createContext in cordis-host-runner
-
ExecutionAbuse sandbox boundary
-
ImpactLeak limited data within host context
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
|
| Exploitation Conditions | The flaw is in the createContext function of packages/extensions/cordis-host-runner/src/sandbox.ts in DeepSeek Harness (all 0.1.0-rc.0 through 0.1.0-rc.5), i.e. it requires a deployment running the cordis-host-runner extension's sandbox. Per the CVSS 4.0 vector the attack is remote and unauthenticated (AV:N, PR:N) but is GATED by passive user interaction (UI:P) - a user of the affected application must take some action for the manipulation to trigger - which meaningfully limits drive-by exploitation. Impact is capped at LOW across confidentiality, integrity and availability with no scope change, so a successful attack yields limited sandbox-boundary effects rather than host takeover. The exact manipulation that triggers the sandbox issue is not described in the available sources, and no non-default configuration is identified as a prerequisite. No vendor patch or fixed version is listed in the evidence (vendor did not respond). |
| Impact | This is a moderate-severity, lower-priority issue by most signals. The only quantitative source is a CVSS 4.0 vector (5.3, Medium) reported by VulDB: AV:N (network), AC:L (low complexity), AT:N, PR:N (no privileges), UI:P (passive user interaction required), with uniformly LOW impact to confidentiality, integrity and availability (VC:L/VI:L/VA:L) and no scope change (SC:N/SI:N/SA:N). The vuln.today decision label is 'this_month' - a routine-remediation priority, NOT act_now or emergency. There is no CISA KEV listing and no EPSS score in the provided data, so exploitation-probability cannot be quantified. No confirmed public exploit code is present - references are VulDB informational/CTI pages plus a submission link, not verified working exploit code. The CWE is CWE-265 (privilege/sandbox issue) and the flaw is a 'sandbox issue' in a JavaScript createContext routine, yet the capped LOW impacts indicate limited blast radius rather than full code execution or broad disclosure. Conflicting/soft signals to flag: the Tags label this 'Information Disclosure' (confidentiality-oriented) while the vendor-style vector assigns LOW integrity and availability impact too - the actual trigger and the precise impact split are not described in the available sources. The vendor (DeepSeek) was contacted but did not respond, so no vendor confirmation, patch, or affected-version authority exists. Net: a real but low-urgency finding, dominated by a very small deployment footprint and absence of exploitation evidence rather than by technical severity. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A remote attacker lures a user of a DeepSeek Harness-based application (≤0.1.0-rc.5) into triggering the vulnerable createContext path in the cordis-host-runner sandbox, where crafted input abuses the sandbox boundary to leak limited information or make minor unauthorized reads/writes within the host context. Exploitation needs passive user interaction (UI:P) but no authentication (PR:N); the precise trigger is not described in the available sources. No verified public exploit code was identified - only VulDB advisory/CTI references exist. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 26, 2026
Sandbox isolation in DeepSeek Harness 0.1.0-rc.0 through 0.1.0-rc.5 can be manipulated through the createContext function of the cordis-host-runner extension (packages/extensions/cordis-host-runner/src/sandbox.ts), giving remote, unauthenticated attackers limited confidentiality, integrity and availability impact - but only where a user of the affected deployment takes an interaction step, as reflected in the UI:P metric. Impact is capped at LOW on all three pillars with no scope change, so the realistic outcome is a weakened sandbox boundary rather than host takeover. No CISA KEV entry and no public exploit code were identified at time of analysis, no vendor patch or fixed version is listed, and the vendor was contacted about the disclosure without responding; VulDB-derived triage places the issue in the 'this_month' priority band.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch or fixed version is identified at time of analysis: DeepSeek was contacted about the disclosure and did not respond, and none of the available references (VulDB records 426331 and 426331/cti, the VulDB CVE page, submission 1012736, ENISA EUVD-2026-109917) point to an updated build, so there is no exact version to upgrade to yet. Until a fix appears, the most direct compensating control is to stop loading the cordis-host-runner extension on deployments that do not strictly need hosted extension execution, which removes the attack surface but also disables extension hosting; where the extension is required, restrict it to first-party or reviewed extension code only, accepting that this is a trust-based control rather than a sandbox fix. Because the attack path is remote (AV:N), reducing network exposure of the harness service - binding it to localhost, placing it behind a reverse proxy that enforces authentication, or firewalling it to known clients - lowers the pool of reachable attackers, though it does not correct the underlying privilege-handling defect and it will break integrations that depend on remote access. Since exploitation is gated by user interaction (UI:P), warn users of affected deployments against interacting with untrusted extension content or prompts while the issue is unpatched, and track the VulDB and EUVD records for a vendor response or patched release before re-enabling unrestricted use.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The flaw lives in TypeScript source shipped with the cordis-host-runner extension of DeepSeek Harness, specifically the createContext function in packages/extensions/cordis-host-runner/src/sandbox.ts. That function is part of the extension host's sandboxing layer - the component that builds the restricted context in which hosted extension code executes - so a manipulation there maps to a failure of the confinement boundary rather than to a memory-safety defect. The assigned CWE-265 is a privilege-issues category covering improper assignment or handling of privileges, which is consistent with a sandbox context that does not enforce the intended privilege separation; the exact manipulation that triggers the sandbox issue is not described in the available sources. Exposure requires a deployment that actually runs the cordis-host-runner extension's sandbox, and no non-default configuration is identified as an additional prerequisite. Version coverage comes from ENISA EUVD, which lists every 0.1.0 release candidate from rc.0 to rc.5, while the supplied CPE (cpe:2.3:a:deepseek:harness:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*) is a wildcard and therefore gives no granular version matching.
Know when Deepseek gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Remote, no auth (PR:N) but user interaction required (UI:R from the 4.0 UI:P); impacts kept Low and scope unchanged, matching the only quantitative source and the limited sandbox-boundary effect.
Primary rating from Vendor (VulDB).
CVSS VectorVendor: VulDB
DescriptionCVE.org
A vulnerability was found in DeepSeek Harness up to 0.1.0-rc.5. This vulnerability affects the function createContext of the file packages/extensions/cordis-host-runner/src/sandbox.ts. The manipulation results in sandbox issue. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
DeepSeek R1 through V3.1 allows XSS, as demonstrated by JavaScript execution in the context of the run-html-chat.deepsee
DeepSeek V3.2 has a Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability, which allows JavaScript execution through model-generated
Improper authorization in DeepSeek Harness 0.2.0-rc.0 through 0.2.0-rc.2 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to perf
EUVD-2026-109917
GHSA-87qr-qp63-3pcq
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
VulDB
Exploit-DB