Skip to main content

DeepSeek Harness CVE-2026-116367

| EUVDEUVD-2026-109917 MEDIUM
Privilege Issues (CWE-265)
2026-10-26 VulDB GHSA-87qr-qp63-3pcq
5.3
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: VulDB
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Deliver crafted input to Harness app
  2. Exploit
    Reach createContext in cordis-host-runner
  3. Execution
    Abuse sandbox boundary
  4. Impact
    Leak limited data within host context

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
Exploitation Conditions

The flaw is in the createContext function of packages/extensions/cordis-host-runner/src/sandbox.ts in DeepSeek Harness (all 0.1.0-rc.0 through 0.1.0-rc.5), i.e. it requires a deployment running the cordis-host-runner extension's sandbox. Per the CVSS 4.0 vector the attack is remote and unauthenticated (AV:N, PR:N) but is GATED by passive user interaction (UI:P) - a user of the affected application must take some action for the manipulation to trigger - which meaningfully limits drive-by exploitation. Impact is capped at LOW across confidentiality, integrity and availability with no scope change, so a successful attack yields limited sandbox-boundary effects rather than host takeover. The exact manipulation that triggers the sandbox issue is not described in the available sources, and no non-default configuration is identified as a prerequisite. No vendor patch or fixed version is listed in the evidence (vendor did not respond).

Impact

This is a moderate-severity, lower-priority issue by most signals. The only quantitative source is a CVSS 4.0 vector (5.3, Medium) reported by VulDB: AV:N (network), AC:L (low complexity), AT:N, PR:N (no privileges), UI:P (passive user interaction required), with uniformly LOW impact to confidentiality, integrity and availability (VC:L/VI:L/VA:L) and no scope change (SC:N/SI:N/SA:N). The vuln.today decision label is 'this_month' - a routine-remediation priority, NOT act_now or emergency. There is no CISA KEV listing and no EPSS score in the provided data, so exploitation-probability cannot be quantified. No confirmed public exploit code is present - references are VulDB informational/CTI pages plus a submission link, not verified working exploit code. The CWE is CWE-265 (privilege/sandbox issue) and the flaw is a 'sandbox issue' in a JavaScript createContext routine, yet the capped LOW impacts indicate limited blast radius rather than full code execution or broad disclosure. Conflicting/soft signals to flag: the Tags label this 'Information Disclosure' (confidentiality-oriented) while the vendor-style vector assigns LOW integrity and availability impact too - the actual trigger and the precise impact split are not described in the available sources. The vendor (DeepSeek) was contacted but did not respond, so no vendor confirmation, patch, or affected-version authority exists. Net: a real but low-urgency finding, dominated by a very small deployment footprint and absence of exploitation evidence rather than by technical severity.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A remote attacker lures a user of a DeepSeek Harness-based application (≤0.1.0-rc.5) into triggering the vulnerable createContext path in the cordis-host-runner sandbox, where crafted input abuses the sandbox boundary to leak limited information or make minor unauthorized reads/writes within the host context. Exploitation needs passive user interaction (UI:P) but no authentication (PR:N); the precise trigger is not described in the available sources. No verified public exploit code was identified - only VulDB advisory/CTI references exist.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 26, 2026

Sandbox isolation in DeepSeek Harness 0.1.0-rc.0 through 0.1.0-rc.5 can be manipulated through the createContext function of the cordis-host-runner extension (packages/extensions/cordis-host-runner/src/sandbox.ts), giving remote, unauthenticated attackers limited confidentiality, integrity and availability impact - but only where a user of the affected deployment takes an interaction step, as reflected in the UI:P metric. Impact is capped at LOW on all three pillars with no scope change, so the realistic outcome is a weakened sandbox boundary rather than host takeover. No CISA KEV entry and no public exploit code were identified at time of analysis, no vendor patch or fixed version is listed, and the vendor was contacted about the disclosure without responding; VulDB-derived triage places the issue in the 'this_month' priority band.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch or fixed version is identified at time of analysis: DeepSeek was contacted about the disclosure and did not respond, and none of the available references (VulDB records 426331 and 426331/cti, the VulDB CVE page, submission 1012736, ENISA EUVD-2026-109917) point to an updated build, so there is no exact version to upgrade to yet. Until a fix appears, the most direct compensating control is to stop loading the cordis-host-runner extension on deployments that do not strictly need hosted extension execution, which removes the attack surface but also disables extension hosting; where the extension is required, restrict it to first-party or reviewed extension code only, accepting that this is a trust-based control rather than a sandbox fix. Because the attack path is remote (AV:N), reducing network exposure of the harness service - binding it to localhost, placing it behind a reverse proxy that enforces authentication, or firewalling it to known clients - lowers the pool of reachable attackers, though it does not correct the underlying privilege-handling defect and it will break integrations that depend on remote access. Since exploitation is gated by user interaction (UI:P), warn users of affected deployments against interacting with untrusted extension content or prompts while the issue is unpatched, and track the VulDB and EUVD records for a vendor response or patched release before re-enabling unrestricted use.

Affected VersionsENISA

harness 0.1.0-rc.5
harness 0.1.0-rc.3
harness 0.1.0-rc.0
harness 0.1.0-rc.1
harness 0.1.0-rc.2
harness 0.1.0-rc.4

Affected Packages

euvd harness no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw lives in TypeScript source shipped with the cordis-host-runner extension of DeepSeek Harness, specifically the createContext function in packages/extensions/cordis-host-runner/src/sandbox.ts. That function is part of the extension host's sandboxing layer - the component that builds the restricted context in which hosted extension code executes - so a manipulation there maps to a failure of the confinement boundary rather than to a memory-safety defect. The assigned CWE-265 is a privilege-issues category covering improper assignment or handling of privileges, which is consistent with a sandbox context that does not enforce the intended privilege separation; the exact manipulation that triggers the sandbox issue is not described in the available sources. Exposure requires a deployment that actually runs the cordis-host-runner extension's sandbox, and no non-default configuration is identified as an additional prerequisite. Version coverage comes from ENISA EUVD, which lists every 0.1.0 release candidate from rc.0 to rc.5, while the supplied CPE (cpe:2.3:a:deepseek:harness:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*) is a wildcard and therefore gives no granular version matching.

Know when Deepseek gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (VulDB) PRIMARY 5.3 MEDIUM
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 6.3 MEDIUM

Remote, no auth (PR:N) but user interaction required (UI:R from the 4.0 UI:P); impacts kept Low and scope unchanged, matching the only quantitative source and the limited sandbox-boundary effect.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (VulDB).

CVSS VectorVendor: VulDB

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Passive
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
Low
Vulnerable system: Integrity
Low
Vulnerable system: Availability
Low
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

A vulnerability was found in DeepSeek Harness up to 0.1.0-rc.5. This vulnerability affects the function createContext of the file packages/extensions/cordis-host-runner/src/sandbox.ts. The manipulation results in sandbox issue. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 78% exploitable
Prevalence
Rare
pre-release (0.1.0-rc) niche AI agent harness, negligible production footprint
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium

Priority Score

26
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +26
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy