Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessGain adjacent-network position (AV:A)
-
ExploitSend crafted traffic to unauthenticated service (PR:N/UI:N)
-
ImpactDegrade device availability and expose limited data (A:H/C:L)
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V14 - Data Protection Data exposure prevention
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Collection, Discovery The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to occupy an adjacent network position relative to the affected HPE networking device (CVSS AV:A - typically the same physical/logical Layer-2 segment or broadcast domain), not arbitrary internet access; within that position no authentication (PR:N) and no user interaction (UI:N) are needed, and complexity is low (AC:L). The dominant stated impact is availability (A:H) with limited confidentiality (C:L). The limiting factor is the adjacency requirement, which confines realistic exploitation to insiders, an already-compromised LAN, or on-path attackers. The exact vulnerable feature, protocol, or configuration cannot be named because no CVE description was provided; verify the triggering conditions against HPE bulletin hpesbnw05162en_us. |
| Impact | Signals are moderate and partially conflicting. The supplied CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H, base 7.1) indicates an adjacent-network, low-complexity, unauthenticated flaw whose dominant impact is availability (A:H) with only limited confidentiality (C:L) and no integrity impact - yet the single input Tag labels this 'Information Disclosure', which does not match an availability-driven vector; this discrepancy should be resolved against the HPE bulletin before treating it as a data-disclosure issue. The vuln.today priority is 'this_week', not act_now/emergency. There is no CISA KEV entry, no EPSS score, and no PoC or exploit reference in the input, so exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis'. The AV:A requirement (attacker must be on the same adjacent/Layer-2 network segment, not the open internet) materially lowers real-world exposure compared with a network-vector flaw. Net: a genuine but not emergency-grade issue warranting patching on the stated weekly cadence rather than drop-everything response, with the caveat that no CVE description was provided, so mechanism and exact impact cannot be independently confirmed. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker already positioned on the same adjacent/Layer-2 network as the affected HPE networking device sends crafted traffic to it without needing credentials or user interaction, primarily causing a denial-of-service/availability loss and possibly limited information exposure. No public exploit or PoC reference is present in the supplied data. The adjacent-network requirement means this is realistically an insider, compromised-LAN, or on-path scenario rather than internet-wide exploitation. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 22, 2026
Denial of service with a limited information-disclosure component affects HPE networking devices, where an attacker positioned on an adjacent network segment can degrade availability severely (A:H) and potentially read a small amount of data (C:L) without authentication (PR:N) or user interaction (UI:N). The 7.1 severity is moderated in practice by the adjacency precondition (AV:A), which confines realistic exposure to insiders, on-path attackers, or hosts on an already-compromised Layer-2 segment rather than arbitrary internet clients. No CVE description was supplied and no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, so the specific vulnerable feature, protocol and affected models must be confirmed against HPE bulletin hpesbnw05162en_us.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch or fixed version is identified in the available data, so the first action is to retrieve HPE bulletin hpesbnw05162en_us (https://support.hpe.com/hpesc/public/docDisplay?docId=hpesbnw05162en_us&docLocale=en_US) and confirm which firmware release HPE designates as the fix for each affected platform, then schedule the upgrade; until that release is applied, treat the devices as unpatched. Because exploitation requires an adjacent Layer-2 position, the effective compensating controls are segmentation and adjacency reduction: move management and sensitive device interfaces onto dedicated VLANs isolated from general user and guest segments (trade-off: additional switch configuration and routing complexity, and some management workflows break unless jump hosts are provisioned), enforce port security and disable unused access ports so unauthorised hosts cannot attach to the same broadcast domain (trade-off: onboarding friction and the need to maintain MAC/IP inventories), and apply 802.1X or MAC authentication on access edges (trade-off: legacy and OT endpoints often fail authentication and require exception lists). Restricting remote-management exposure and monitoring for abnormal device resets, reboots or availability loss provide detection coverage but do not prevent the attack, and none of these controls substitutes for the vendor fix once it is confirmed.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root-cause class is unknown: no CWE mapping and no CVE description were provided, and the trigger for the fault is not described in the available sources, so it would be speculation to attribute it to any particular protocol, parsing path, or implementation pattern. What the assessed CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H vector does establish is the exposure envelope: the attacker must hold an adjacent network position (AV:A), typically the same physical or logical Layer-2 segment or broadcast domain as the affected HPE device, rather than routable internet reachability; within that position no credentials and no victim interaction are required, and the attack complexity is low. The impact profile is asymmetric, with a high availability cost and only limited confidentiality loss, and no scope change, meaning the compromise does not cross a security boundary beyond the vulnerable component. The reporting source is HPE's own security-alert address and the single reference is an HPE support bulletin (hpesbnw05162en_us), with the third-party tag 'Information Disclosure' - a tag that understates the availability-weighted vector - and no CPE identifiers, which prevents pinning the affected product families or firmware branches from the supplied data alone.
Know when Hpe gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H
Retained the vendor vector absent a description: AV:A reflects adjacent-network reach, PR:N/UI:N/AC:L unauthenticated low-complexity, with availability-dominant impact (A:H) and only limited confidentiality.
Primary rating from Vendor (hpe).
CVSS VectorVendor: hpe
DescriptionCVE.org
No description provided
Executive ViewAI
A high-severity availability flaw in HPE networking devices could let someone on the same local network segment disrupt connectivity for internal users and services. Because it requires an adjacent network position rather than internet access, exposure is limited to insiders, on-path attackers, or hosts on an already-compromised segment - but for organizations with flat or poorly segmented networks, a single compromised host could take a critical segment offline. Leadership should care because a successful attack targets core network availability, with knock-on effects to any business service dependent on that infrastructure.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: strict Layer-2 segmentation and ACLs isolating affected HPE devices from untrusted hosts, port security and DHCP snooping on access switches, monitoring/alerting on anomalous traffic toward affected segments, and accelerated remediation of any compromised endpoints on shared segments.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
An unprivileged network attacker could gain system privileges to provisioned Intel manageability SKUs: Intel Active Mana
The read_mru_list function in NTP before 4.2.8p9 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a craf
Default, hard-coded credentials shipped on several administrative and system accounts in HPE's Analytics and Location En
A directory traversal vulnerability in Hewlett Packard Enterprise Insight Remote Support may allow remote code execution
A potential security vulnerability has been identified in Hewlett Packard Enterprise OfficeConnect 1820, 1850, and 1920S
A security vulnerability in HPE Smart Update Manager (SUM) prior to version 8.5.6 could allow remote unauthorized access
A vulnerability in HPE Insight Remote Support (IRS) prior to v7.15.0.646 may allow an unauthenticated denial of service
NTP through 4.2.8p12 has a NULL Pointer Dereference. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely expl
A maximum-severity, network-reachable flaw (CVSS 3.1 base 10.0) in an as-yet-unnamed HPE product allows remote attackers
Unauthenticated network attackers can potentially achieve high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact again
HPE security bulletin hpesbnw05162en_us documents a maximum-severity (CVSS 10.0) exposure in an HPE product that is not
HPE advisory hpesbnw05162en_us covers a product flaw carrying a CVSS 3.1 base score of 10.0 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H
EUVD-2026-108406
GHSA-3gjw-384c-p32r
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB