Skip to main content

HPE Networking EUVDEUVD-2026-108404

| CVE-2026-95710 HIGH
Buffer Overflow (CWE-119)
2026-10-22 security-alert@hpe.com GHSA-cmrg-c64v-p7h4
7.1
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: hpe
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain adjacent-network foothold
  2. Exploit
    Send crafted traffic to device
  3. Impact
    Disrupt device availability (DoS)

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, buffer size validation
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to hold an adjacent-network position (AV:A) - the same Layer-2 segment or logically adjacent network as the affected HPE networking device - so it is not exploitable from the open internet without first reaching that segment. Within that position no authentication (PR:N) and no user interaction (UI:N) are needed, and attack complexity is low (AC:L). No description was provided, so the specific feature, protocol, or configuration that must be present is not described in the available sources and should be confirmed against the HPE advisory (docId hpesbnw05162en_us). The principal limiting factor is the adjacency requirement; the primary realistic outcome is service disruption (A:H) with minor integrity impact (I:L) and no confidentiality impact (C:N).

Impact

Signals point to a genuine but moderate priority rather than an emergency. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 7.1 (High) with vector AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H: exploitation requires an adjacent-network position (AV:A) rather than full remote reachability, needs no authentication (PR:N) and no user interaction (UI:N), and the dominant impact is availability (A:H) with only minor integrity impact (I:L) and NO confidentiality impact (C:N). This availability-centric profile is effectively a denial-of-service/disruption issue, which directly conflicts with the input Tag 'Information Disclosure' - information disclosure would require confidentiality impact, but C:N explicitly rules that out; treat the tag as suspect and verify the actual impact with HPE. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no PoC or exploit reference are present in the input, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no evidence of active exploitation; this lowers near-term urgency relative to the raw 7.1. The vuln.today Decision label is 'this_week', consistent with a serious flaw that should be remediated on a prompt but non-emergency cadence. The adjacency requirement (AV:A) is the main factor containing real-world risk: an attacker must already be on the same logical/physical network segment as the affected HPE networking device. No description was provided, so the trigger and exact affected product are not described in the available sources and should be confirmed against the HPE advisory.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has gained a foothold on the same adjacent network segment as a vulnerable HPE networking device sends crafted traffic to it, without needing credentials or user interaction, and disrupts the device's availability (high availability impact) with a minor integrity effect. The specific trigger is not described in the available sources, and no public exploit or PoC is referenced.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 22, 2026

Adjacent-network attackers can cause high availability impact and minor integrity changes on HPE networking devices through CVE-2026-95710, which carries a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.1. The vector (AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H) means an attacker on the same Layer-2 segment or a logically adjacent network needs no credentials and no user interaction, and the flaw is not reachable from the open internet without first reaching that segment. No public exploit code or CISA KEV entry was identified at time of analysis, and the trigger itself is not described in the available sources.

RemediationAI

No exact fixed version is identified in the supplied data, so the authoritative next step is to open HPE advisory hpesbnw05162en_us and apply the firmware update or vendor-listed workaround it specifies for each affected model. Because the assessed vector is adjacent-network only (AV:A), the exposure-reduction measure supported by the evidence is to keep the affected devices off shared Layer-2 segments with untrusted hosts - isolate management and data VLANs and restrict which devices can reach the same broadcast domain - at the cost of added segmentation complexity and possible management-path disruption during the change. Monitor the devices for unexpected availability loss and for integrity changes (A:H/I:L) on shared segments; this provides detection but does not remediate the flaw. With a this_week priority label, remediation should be scheduled in the current weekly cycle.

Affected VersionsENISA

Unknown product 8.12.0.0 ≤8.13.3.0
Unknown product 10.3.0.0 ≤10.4.1.13
Unknown product 10.8.0.0 ≤10.8.1.1
Unknown product 8.10.0.0 ≤8.10.0.23
Unknown product 10.6.0.0 ≤10.7.2.6

Affected Packages

euvd unknown_product no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The affected technology is HPE networking equipment, but no CPE strings, model list, firmware range, or CWE identifier were supplied, and the vendor description is absent. The only mechanism-level evidence is the CVSS vector, which places the attack path on an adjacent network (AV:A), with low complexity (AC:L), no privileges (PR:N) and no user interaction (UI:N); the assessed impact is availability-high (A:H) with integrity-low (I:L) and confidentiality-none (C:N). The public tag labels the issue 'Information Disclosure', which conflicts with the C:N metric and remains unverified; it may reflect the reporter's categorization rather than the assessed impact. Because the sources do not state which feature, protocol, or configuration is involved, the trigger is not described in the available sources, and the HPE advisory at docId hpesbnw05162en_us should be treated as the authoritative technical reference.

Know when Hpe gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (hpe) PRIMARY 7.1 HIGH
AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.1 HIGH

No description was provided, so metrics follow the vendor vector: adjacent unauthenticated access (AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N), dominant availability impact (A:H), minor integrity (I:L), no confidentiality (C:N).

3.1 AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H
4.0 AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (hpe).

CVSS VectorVendor: hpe

Attack Vector
Adjacent
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

No description provided

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A high-severity vulnerability in HPE networking devices allows unauthenticated attackers on the same Layer-2 segment to cause significant availability disruptions and minor integrity changes. This puts network uptime at risk for any organization with affected HPE gear, potentially disrupting business operations. Leadership should prioritize patching or mitigation to prevent service outages.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations include strict Layer-2 segmentation, restricting physical and logical access to network segments, and monitoring for anomalous traffic.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 92% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
HPE enterprise networking appliance; specific affected product unspecified in input
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Controlled
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

36
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +36
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

More in Hpe

View all
CVE-2017-5689 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 02

An unprivileged network attacker could gain system privileges to provisioned Intel manageability SKUs: Intel Active Mana

CVE-2016-7434 HIGH POC
7.5 Jan 13

The read_mru_list function in NTP before 4.2.8p9 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a craf

CVE-2026-76708 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Sep 22

Default, hard-coded credentials shipped on several administrative and system accounts in HPE's Analytics and Location En

CVE-2024-53676 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 27

A directory traversal vulnerability in Hewlett Packard Enterprise Insight Remote Support may allow remote code execution

CVE-2022-37932 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 12

A potential security vulnerability has been identified in Hewlett Packard Enterprise OfficeConnect 1820, 1850, and 1920S

CVE-2020-7136 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 30

A security vulnerability in HPE Smart Update Manager (SUM) prior to version 8.5.6 could allow remote unauthorized access

CVE-2025-37097 HIGH POC
7.5 Jul 01

A vulnerability in HPE Insight Remote Support (IRS) prior to v7.15.0.646 may allow an unauthenticated denial of service

CVE-2019-8936 HIGH POC
7.5 May 15

NTP through 4.2.8p12 has a NULL Pointer Dereference. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely expl

CVE-2026-79849 CRITICAL
10.0 Oct 22

A maximum-severity, network-reachable flaw (CVSS 3.1 base 10.0) in an as-yet-unnamed HPE product allows remote attackers

CVE-2026-79848 CRITICAL
10.0 Oct 22

Unauthenticated network attackers can potentially achieve high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact again

CVE-2026-79851 CRITICAL
10.0 Oct 22

HPE security bulletin hpesbnw05162en_us documents a maximum-severity (CVSS 10.0) exposure in an HPE product that is not

CVE-2026-79847 CRITICAL
10.0 Oct 22

HPE advisory hpesbnw05162en_us covers a product flaw carrying a CVSS 3.1 base score of 10.0 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy