Skip to main content

RabbitMQ EUVDEUVD-2026-101419

| CVE-2026-67418 MEDIUM
Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input (CWE-1286)
2026-10-14 GitHub_M
5.3
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: GitHub_M
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate as publisher with topic write permission
  2. Delivery
    Craft MQTT 5 PUBLISH with Request-Problem-Information property
  3. Exploit
    Broker stores and routes inapplicable property
  4. Execution
    serialise_prop/2 raises function_clause on subscriber path
  5. Impact
    Victim subscriber MQTT/Web MQTT connection closed

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Hardware access control granularity
Exploitation Conditions

Requires an authenticated MQTT client that both connects over MQTT 5 and holds write permission on a topic that at least one other client is subscribed to; the attacker must send a PUBLISH packet containing the Request-Problem-Information property (property id valid only on CONNECT). Exploitation is bounded by several limiting factors: valid broker credentials and topic-write authorization are mandatory (PR:L), the rabbitmq_mqtt plugin must be enabled with MQTT 5 in use, a matching subscriber must exist for the crash to occur, and impact is confined to dropping that single victim MQTT/Web MQTT connection - the broker, the publisher connection, and other clients remain available. Affected only in 3.13.0 through 3.13.18 (and the 4.x lines prior to the fixed releases).

Impact

This is a genuinely medium/low-priority issue, and the signals are consistent rather than conflicting. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L) scores 5.3 (Medium), which accurately reflects the constrained impact: no confidentiality or integrity loss and only LOW availability impact. Crucially, PR:L confirms exploitation requires an authenticated publisher holding topic write permission - this is not an unauthenticated remote flaw despite AV:N. The description itself bounds the damage: only the targeted, separately-authenticated subscriber's MQTT/Web MQTT connection is dropped via an uncontained function_clause exception; the publisher connection and the broker as a whole stay available, and the vendor explicitly states that queued replay, retained-message persistence, and broker-wide denial of service were NOT established. No EPSS score was provided, there is no CISA KEV listing, and no public exploit was supplied - the GitHub 'source code evidence' is the vendor patch (PR #17035), not weaponized exploit code, so it must not be counted as POC availability. Net: a real but low-severity, authenticated, single-victim connection-DoS, not an urgent patch-now emergency.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who already has valid broker credentials and write permission to a topic publishes an MQTT 5 PUBLISH packet carrying the Request-Problem-Information property, which is only legal on CONNECT. The broker stores and routes the malformed property; when it serializes the outbound PUBLISH to a matching subscriber, serialise_prop/2 has no clause for it and crashes that subscriber's connection. No public exploit code was identified, but the trigger is trivial to craft given the low attack complexity (AC:L).

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.4% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026

Denial of service in RabbitMQ's MQTT plugin lets an authenticated publisher using MQTT 5 force a single victim subscriber's connection to be dropped. Because the parser accepts the CONNECT-only Request-Problem-Information property on PUBLISH packets and the broker then routes it to matching subscribers, the outbound serialization path hits a missing clause in serialise_prop/2 and raises an uncontained function_clause that closes the victim's MQTT or Web MQTT connection. Exploitation requires valid broker credentials with topic-write permission on a topic that at least one other client subscribes to, and the broker, the publisher connection, and all other clients remain available; no public exploit code was identified at time of analysis, and no confirmed active exploitation (CISA KEV) has been reported.

RemediationAI

Upgrade to a fixed release: 3.13.19, 4.0.24, 4.1.15, 4.2.10, or 4.3.5 depending on your maintenance line. This is a vendor-released patch and is the only complete fix; the corresponding upstream changes are visible in pull requests 17035 and 17287 and commits 4639a4318c72a0660e4bc014767fad70ce288fbc and 908f944a1d581d10774f8d6d0dcf2a1a713779fb, with the advisory at https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/security/advisories/GHSA-jv99-v328-mvmm. If you cannot patch immediately, the most effective compensating control is to disable the RabbitMQ MQTT plugin entirely (rabbitmq-plugins disable rabbitmq_mqtt) when MQTT is not a required interface, which removes the attack surface at the cost of losing all MQTT connectivity; if MQTT is required, forcing clients to MQTT 3.1.1 removes the MQTT 5 property-bearing packets that trigger the defect, at the cost of MQTT 5 features such as properties-based metadata and enhanced authentication flows. A useful partial mitigation is to tighten topic write permissions so that only fully trusted publishers hold write access to topics that other clients actively consume, and to audit which topics have subscribers - this reduces the pool of potential attackers but does not eliminate the flaw for authorized publishers, so it should be treated as temporary. Operators should also alert on function_clause exceptions originating from rabbit_mqtt_packet (particularly serialise_prop/2) accompanied by repeated single-client disconnects, as that pattern is the observable signature of attempted or successful exploitation.

Affected VersionsENISA

rabbitmq-server 4.0.0, < 4.0.24
rabbitmq-server 4.1.0, < 4.1.15
rabbitmq-server 4.3.0, < 4.3.5
rabbitmq-server 3.13.0, < 3.13.19
rabbitmq-server 4.2.0, < 4.2.10

Affected Packages

euvd rabbitmq_server fix: 3.13.19, 4.0.24, 4.1.15, 4.2.10, 4.3.5

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw is a CWE-1286 (Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input) defect in the MQTT 5 codec of the rabbitmq_mqtt plugin, specifically deps/rabbitmq_mqtt/src/rabbit_mqtt_packet.erl. MQTT 5 defines a property set whose members are scoped to specific control packet types; Request-Problem-Information (property identifier 0x17) is legal only on CONNECT. Prior to the fix, parse_props/2 and parse_prop/2 were packet-type agnostic, so the parser consumed the property on a PUBLISH packet and stored it in the decoded property map. The broker then treated it as an ordinary message property: it persisted/queued it and included it in the outbound message delivered to any matching subscriber. On the subscriber egress path, serialise_prop/2 had no clause for the inapplicable property, producing a function_clause exception in the subscriber's Erlang connection process, which terminates that MQTT (or Web MQTT) session. The upstream fix threads the packet type through parse_props/parse_prop (e.g. parse_props(Rest1, ProtoVer, Type)) and guards each property clause with the packet types that legitimately carry it (PUBLISH, will_props, SUBSCRIBE, CONNECT), so an inapplicable property on PUBLISH is rejected at parse time rather than surviving into the routing and serialization path. There is no evidence that the exception propagates beyond the affected connection process, and queued replay, retained-message persistence, and broker-wide denial of service were explicitly not established.

Know when Rabbitmq gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (GitHub_M) PRIMARY 5.3 MEDIUM
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 4.3 MEDIUM

Network-reachable MQTT with low complexity but requires an authenticated publisher with topic-write rights (PR:L); impact is limited to dropping a single subscriber connection (A:L), no C/I loss.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (GitHub_M).

CVSS VectorVendor: GitHub_M

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
None
Vulnerable system: Integrity
None
Vulnerable system: Availability
Low
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 14, 2026 - 18:05 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 14, 2026 - 16:07 cve.org
MEDIUM 5.3

DescriptionCVE.org

RabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. From 3.13.0 until 3.13.19, 4.0.24, 4.1.15, 4.2.10, and 4.3.5, the MQTT 5 parser in deps/rabbitmq_mqtt/src/rabbit_mqtt_packet.erl accepts Request-Problem-Information on PUBLISH packets even though the property is valid only for CONNECT. An authenticated publisher with topic write permission can cause the broker to store and route that inapplicable property to a separately authenticated matching subscriber. When the subscriber path serializes the outbound PUBLISH, serialise_prop/2 has no matching clause, and the uncontained function_clause exception closes the victim MQTT or Web MQTT connection. The publisher connection and broker remain available, and queued replay, retained-message persistence, and broker-wide denial of service were not established. This issue is fixed in versions 3.13.19, 4.0.24, 4.1.15, 4.2.10, and 4.3.5.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.4%
Top 67% exploitable
Prevalence
High
widely deployed enterprise messaging broker; MQTT 5 plugin is a subset of installs
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.4%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

26
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +26
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

CVE-2026-57219 HIGH POC
8.7 Jul 10

Sensitive credential disclosure in RabbitMQ affects installations running the management plugin with OAuth 2 configured

CVE-2019-11287 HIGH POC
7.5 Nov 23

Pivotal RabbitMQ, versions 3.7.x prior to 3.7.21 and 3.8.x prior to 3.8.1, and RabbitMQ for Pivotal Platform, 1.16.x ver

CVE-2026-63335 MEDIUM POC
6.3 Aug 18

Denial of service in the RabbitMQ Java client library (com.rabbitmq:amqp-client ≤ 5.30.0) allows a malicious or compromi

CVE-2016-9877 CRITICAL
9.8 Dec 29

An issue was discovered in Pivotal RabbitMQ 3.x before 3.5.8 and 3.6.x before 3.6.6 and RabbitMQ for PCF 1.5.x before 1.

CVE-2026-77411 CRITICAL
9.5 Sep 16

Parsing desynchronization in the RabbitMQ amqp091-go AMQP 0.9.1 client library before 1.13.0 lets a malicious or comprom

CVE-2026-77405 CRITICAL
9.4 Sep 16

RabbitMQ's amqp091-go Go client library, in all versions before 1.13.0, builds TLS configuration from amqps:// URIs with

CVE-2021-32718 MEDIUM POC
5.4 Jun 28

RabbitMQ is a multi-protocol messaging broker. Rated medium severity (CVSS 5.4), this vulnerability is remotely exploita

CVE-2026-67404 CRITICAL
9.2 Sep 23

RabbitMQ brokers that use the OAuth2 plugin can silently fall back to disabled TLS certificate verification when no CA b

CVE-2026-77408 CRITICAL
9.1 Sep 16

Silent AMQP 0.9.1 metadata corruption in the RabbitMQ amqp091-go Go client library prior to 1.13.0 lets an application t

CVE-2026-67231 CRITICAL
9.1 Sep 23

TLS client-authentication bypass in the RabbitMQ trust-store plugin lets a remote unauthenticated attacker whose forged

CVE-2026-63336 MEDIUM POC
5.1 Aug 18

TLS certificate validation is completely bypassed in the RabbitMQ Java client library (`com.rabbitmq:amqp-client`) prior

CVE-2026-77412 HIGH
8.9 Sep 16

Denial of service in the official RabbitMQ Go client library amqp091-go (versions prior to 1.13.0): a malicious, comprom

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy