Skip to main content

Juniper Junos OS EUVDEUVD-2026-101385

| CVE-2026-102059 HIGH
OS Command Injection (CWE-78)
2026-10-14 juniper GHSA-w9fm-9w6m-778h
8.7
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: juniper
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain adjacent Layer-2 network foothold
  2. Delivery
    Deploy rogue DHCP server during device phone-home
  3. Exploit
    Inject OS command via crafted DHCP response
  4. Execution
    phcd executes payload as root
  5. Impact
    Full device compromise and pivot

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the Juniper EX/SRX/QFX device to be running the phone-home daemon (phcd), i.e. actively performing phone-home / zero-touch provisioning (ZTP), and the attacker must occupy the same Layer-2 broadcast domain to operate a rogue DHCP server whose response phcd will process (AV:A, not routable/remote). The limiting factors are therefore network adjacency and the device being in the provisioning state; a device not in phone-home provisioning, or one isolated from attacker-controlled DHCP traffic, is not exposed. No user interaction or authentication is required once those conditions hold (PR:N/UI:N), but the attack cannot be launched from an arbitrary internet position.

Impact

This is a genuinely high-priority flaw where the signals largely agree. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N with VC:H/VI:H/VA:H) describes adjacent, unauthenticated, no-interaction exploitation yielding full confidentiality, integrity and availability impact, and the description confirms the payoff is arbitrary command execution as root - a severe technical impact consistent with the 8.7 (High) base score. The vendor (Juniper) reported it and a patch is available, which raises confidence in the technical details. However, the practical risk is tempered by two factors the raw score understates: the attack vector is Adjacent (AV:A), meaning the attacker must already be on the same Layer-2 segment and cannot reach this over the internet, and exploitation depends on the device being in the phone-home / zero-touch-provisioning (ZTP) state where phcd processes DHCP responses. No EPSS score was provided, the CVE is NOT on CISA KEV, and no public exploit was supplied in the intelligence - so there is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' In short: a legitimately dangerous root-level command-injection bug on widely-deployed Juniper gear, but one whose real-world exploitation is gated by network adjacency and provisioning state rather than being remotely and broadly weaponizable.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with a foothold on the same local/adjacent network segment as a Juniper EX/SRX/QFX device that is performing phone-home (ZTP) provisioning stands up a rogue DHCP server. The malicious DHCP response carries crafted data that phcd fails to neutralize, injecting OS commands that execute as root on the device. No public exploit code was identified in the provided data, and exploitation requires Layer-2 adjacency rather than remote internet access.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 3.9% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026

OS command injection in the phcd phone-home daemon of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved lets an adjacent, unauthenticated attacker who operates a rogue DHCP server execute arbitrary commands as root on affected EX Series, SRX Series, and QFX Series devices. Exploitation is not remotely routable: the attacker must share a Layer-2 broadcast domain with the target and the device must be actively running phone-home / zero-touch provisioning (ZTP), which is why an independent assessment rates the attack complexity higher than the vendor's 8.7 score despite the high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact (PR:N/UI:N once those conditions hold). No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis and the flaw is not confirmed actively exploited (no CISA KEV entry), though NVIDIA/ENISA EUVD tracking and a full Juniper advisory (JSA112187) with vendor patches indicate this is a genuinely high-priority, patchable issue.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: upgrade to the fixed Junos OS releases 23.2R2-S7.7, 23.4R2-S8.13, 24.2R2-S5.5, 24.4R2-S5, 25.2R2-S2, 25.4R1-S3, or 26.2R1-S2, or to the fixed Junos OS Evolved releases 23.2R2-S7.7-EVO, 23.4R2-S8.11-EVO, 24.2R2-S5.6-EVO, 24.4R2-S5-EVO, 25.2R2-S2-EVO, 25.2X100-D35-EVO, 25.4R1-S3-EVO, 25.4X300-D40-EVO, or 26.2R1-S2-EVO, following the vendor advisory at https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA112187. Where immediate upgrade is not possible, the most effective compensating control is to eliminate the attack prerequisite rather than the code path: disable phone-home / zero-touch provisioning (and the phcd service) on devices that do not require it, since an unprovisioning device never parses the malicious DHCP reply - the trade-off is loss of automated onboarding and related telemetry. In addition, enable DHCP snooping on all access ports so only trusted, administrator-designated DHCP servers can answer, and rate-limit or block DHCP server traffic arriving from user-facing or untrusted ports; note that DHCP snooping requires a consistent trusted-port configuration and can break legitimate DHCP relay or server roles if misapplied. As a last resort, isolate provisioning-capable devices into a dedicated management VLAN that is not bridged to untrusted hosts, accepting the operational overhead of segregated Layer-2 segments. There is no indication of active exploitation, so patching can proceed on a normal risk-based schedule with precedence for internet-edge SRX and EX/QFX devices still in ZTP.

Affected VersionsENISA

Junos OS 24.2 <24.2R2-S5.5
Junos OS Evolved 25.2X100 <25.2X100-D35-EVO
Junos OS Evolved 24.4 <24.4R2-S5-EVO
Junos OS Evolved 25.4 <25.4R1-S3-EVO
Junos OS Evolved 26.2 <26.2R1-S2-EVO
Junos OS 24.4 <24.4R2-S5
Junos OS 0 <23.2R2-S7.7
Junos OS Evolved 24.2 <24.2R2-S5.6-EVO
Junos OS Evolved 0 <23.2R2-S7.7-EVO
Junos OS Evolved 25.2 <25.2R2-S2-EVO
Junos OS 23.4 <23.4R2-S8.13
Junos OS 25.4 <25.4R1-S3
Junos OS 25.2 <25.2R2-S2
Junos OS Evolved 23.4X100
Junos OS 26.2 <26.2R1-S2
Junos OS Evolved 23.4 <23.4R2-S8.11-EVO
Junos OS Evolved 25.4X300 <25.4X300-D40-EVO

Affected Packages

euvd junos_os fix: 23.2R2-S7.7, 23.4R2-S8.13, 24.2R2-S5.5, 24.4R2-S5, 25.2R2-S2, 25.4R1-S3, 26.2R1-S2
euvd junos_os_evolved fix: 23.2R2-S7.7-EVO, 23.4R2-S8.11-EVO, 24.2R2-S5.6-EVO, 24.4R2-S5-EVO, 25.2R2-S2-EVO, 25.2X100-D35-EVO, 25.4R1-S3-EVO, 25.4X300-D40-EVO, 26.2R1-S2-EVO

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 2 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The root cause is CWE-78 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command), i.e. classic OS command injection: the phone-home daemon (phcd) ingests data from DHCP server responses during zero-touch provisioning and passes attacker-controllable fields to a shell without sanitization, so shell metacharacters embedded in a rogue DHCP reply are interpreted as commands and run with the daemon's root privileges. phcd implements the vendor phone-home/ZTP workflow in both Junos OS (FreeBSD-derived) and Junos OS Evolved (Linux-based) code bases, hence the parallel CPE coverage for cpe:2.3:a:juniper_networks:junos_os and cpe:2.3:a:juniper_networks:junos_os_evolved. Because the injection channel is DHCP, the attack surface is confined to the Layer-2 segment (AV:A in both the vendor CVSS:4.0 vector and the independent CVSS:3.1 assessment), and the device must be in the provisioning state for phcd to process the malicious reply at all; a provisioned or non-phone-home device, or one whose DHCP traffic is not attacker-reachable, is not exposed. The high VC/VI/VA values reflect that a successful injection yields root-level code execution, while SC/SI are rated None and SA Low, indicating impact is contained to the compromised appliance rather than cascading to other components.

Know when Junos Os gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (juniper) PRIMARY 8.7 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L/AU:Y/R:A/V:C/RE:M
vuln.today AI 7.5 HIGH

Adjacent rogue-DHCP vector gives AV:A; dependence on the device being in phone-home provisioning state raises AC:H; no auth (PR:N) and root code execution yields C/I/A:H.

3.1 AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:A/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L

Primary rating from Vendor (juniper).

CVSS VectorVendor: juniper

Attack Vector
Adjacent
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
Low

Lifecycle Timeline

3
Patch available
Oct 14, 2026 - 18:05 EUVD
CVSS changed
Oct 14, 2026 - 17:22 NVD
8.8 (HIGH) 8.7 (HIGH)
CVE Published
Oct 14, 2026 - 16:55 cve.org
HIGH 8.7

DescriptionCVE.org

An Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability in the phone-home daemon (phcd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved on EX Series, SRX Series, and QFX Series allows an adjacent unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges via a rogue DHCP server.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved devices (EX, SRX, and QFX Series) are affected by a high-severity OS command injection vulnerability in the phcd phone-home daemon. An attacker on the same Layer-2 broadcast domain could execute commands as root if the device is actively running phone-home or zero-touch provisioning (ZTP), potentially leading to full device compromise and lateral movement. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and patch available per vendor advisory (JSA112187), making timely patching the top priority for leadership.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
3.9%
Top 10% exploitable
Prevalence
High
Juniper EX/SRX/QFX are widely deployed enterprise/datacenter networking appliances
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 3.9%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Controlled
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

48
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +4
CVSS: +44
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.

CVE-2026-101956 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Unauthenticated remote code execution with root privileges affects Juniper Networks Junos OS devices that expose the J-W

CVE-2026-102175 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Heap-based buffer overflow in the sdxd service-deployment daemon of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allow

CVE-2026-33792 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

A stack-based buffer overflow in the srxpfe packet forwarding process of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series devices

CVE-2026-101986 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Unauthenticated remote code execution with elevated privileges is possible in Juniper Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved thro

CVE-2026-101982 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Remote root code execution in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Junos OS is reachable through protocol-valid

CVE-2026-101990 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Remote code execution (on Junos OS) and rpd denial of service (on Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved) result from a stack-bas

CVE-2026-33796 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Remote code execution with root privileges on Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved is possible when the routin

CVE-2026-101983 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Remote code execution and denial of service in Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved arise from a stack-based b

CVE-2026-101954 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Unauthenticated remote attackers can gain root-level configuration access and fully compromise Juniper Junos OS and Juno

CVE-2026-101980 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Integer underflow in the Junos OS kernel can crash a device when the Extended Echo feature (RFC 8335 ICMP probing) is co

CVE-2026-101950 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Heap-based buffer overflow in Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series devices that have Secure Vector Routing (SVR) enab

CVE-2026-102178 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Stack-based buffer overflow in Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved BGP flowspec handling allows a configured

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy