Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessGain adjacent Layer-2 network foothold
-
DeliveryDeploy rogue DHCP server during device phone-home
-
ExploitInject OS command via crafted DHCP response
-
Executionphcd executes payload as root
-
ImpactFull device compromise and pivot
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the Juniper EX/SRX/QFX device to be running the phone-home daemon (phcd), i.e. actively performing phone-home / zero-touch provisioning (ZTP), and the attacker must occupy the same Layer-2 broadcast domain to operate a rogue DHCP server whose response phcd will process (AV:A, not routable/remote). The limiting factors are therefore network adjacency and the device being in the provisioning state; a device not in phone-home provisioning, or one isolated from attacker-controlled DHCP traffic, is not exposed. No user interaction or authentication is required once those conditions hold (PR:N/UI:N), but the attack cannot be launched from an arbitrary internet position. |
| Impact | This is a genuinely high-priority flaw where the signals largely agree. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N with VC:H/VI:H/VA:H) describes adjacent, unauthenticated, no-interaction exploitation yielding full confidentiality, integrity and availability impact, and the description confirms the payoff is arbitrary command execution as root - a severe technical impact consistent with the 8.7 (High) base score. The vendor (Juniper) reported it and a patch is available, which raises confidence in the technical details. However, the practical risk is tempered by two factors the raw score understates: the attack vector is Adjacent (AV:A), meaning the attacker must already be on the same Layer-2 segment and cannot reach this over the internet, and exploitation depends on the device being in the phone-home / zero-touch-provisioning (ZTP) state where phcd processes DHCP responses. No EPSS score was provided, the CVE is NOT on CISA KEV, and no public exploit was supplied in the intelligence - so there is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' In short: a legitimately dangerous root-level command-injection bug on widely-deployed Juniper gear, but one whose real-world exploitation is gated by network adjacency and provisioning state rather than being remotely and broadly weaponizable. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker with a foothold on the same local/adjacent network segment as a Juniper EX/SRX/QFX device that is performing phone-home (ZTP) provisioning stands up a rogue DHCP server. The malicious DHCP response carries crafted data that phcd fails to neutralize, injecting OS commands that execute as root on the device. No public exploit code was identified in the provided data, and exploitation requires Layer-2 adjacency rather than remote internet access. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026
OS command injection in the phcd phone-home daemon of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved lets an adjacent, unauthenticated attacker who operates a rogue DHCP server execute arbitrary commands as root on affected EX Series, SRX Series, and QFX Series devices. Exploitation is not remotely routable: the attacker must share a Layer-2 broadcast domain with the target and the device must be actively running phone-home / zero-touch provisioning (ZTP), which is why an independent assessment rates the attack complexity higher than the vendor's 8.7 score despite the high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact (PR:N/UI:N once those conditions hold). No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis and the flaw is not confirmed actively exploited (no CISA KEV entry), though NVIDIA/ENISA EUVD tracking and a full Juniper advisory (JSA112187) with vendor patches indicate this is a genuinely high-priority, patchable issue.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: upgrade to the fixed Junos OS releases 23.2R2-S7.7, 23.4R2-S8.13, 24.2R2-S5.5, 24.4R2-S5, 25.2R2-S2, 25.4R1-S3, or 26.2R1-S2, or to the fixed Junos OS Evolved releases 23.2R2-S7.7-EVO, 23.4R2-S8.11-EVO, 24.2R2-S5.6-EVO, 24.4R2-S5-EVO, 25.2R2-S2-EVO, 25.2X100-D35-EVO, 25.4R1-S3-EVO, 25.4X300-D40-EVO, or 26.2R1-S2-EVO, following the vendor advisory at https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA112187. Where immediate upgrade is not possible, the most effective compensating control is to eliminate the attack prerequisite rather than the code path: disable phone-home / zero-touch provisioning (and the phcd service) on devices that do not require it, since an unprovisioning device never parses the malicious DHCP reply - the trade-off is loss of automated onboarding and related telemetry. In addition, enable DHCP snooping on all access ports so only trusted, administrator-designated DHCP servers can answer, and rate-limit or block DHCP server traffic arriving from user-facing or untrusted ports; note that DHCP snooping requires a consistent trusted-port configuration and can break legitimate DHCP relay or server roles if misapplied. As a last resort, isolate provisioning-capable devices into a dedicated management VLAN that is not bridged to untrusted hosts, accepting the operational overhead of segregated Layer-2 segments. There is no indication of active exploitation, so patching can proceed on a normal risk-based schedule with precedence for internet-edge SRX and EX/QFX devices still in ZTP.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 2 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause is CWE-78 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command), i.e. classic OS command injection: the phone-home daemon (phcd) ingests data from DHCP server responses during zero-touch provisioning and passes attacker-controllable fields to a shell without sanitization, so shell metacharacters embedded in a rogue DHCP reply are interpreted as commands and run with the daemon's root privileges. phcd implements the vendor phone-home/ZTP workflow in both Junos OS (FreeBSD-derived) and Junos OS Evolved (Linux-based) code bases, hence the parallel CPE coverage for cpe:2.3:a:juniper_networks:junos_os and cpe:2.3:a:juniper_networks:junos_os_evolved. Because the injection channel is DHCP, the attack surface is confined to the Layer-2 segment (AV:A in both the vendor CVSS:4.0 vector and the independent CVSS:3.1 assessment), and the device must be in the provisioning state for phcd to process the malicious reply at all; a provisioned or non-phone-home device, or one whose DHCP traffic is not attacker-reachable, is not exposed. The high VC/VI/VA values reflect that a successful injection yields root-level code execution, while SC/SI are rated None and SA Low, indicating impact is contained to the compromised appliance rather than cascading to other components.
Know when Junos Os gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L/AU:Y/R:A/V:C/RE:M
Adjacent rogue-DHCP vector gives AV:A; dependence on the device being in phone-home provisioning state raises AC:H; no auth (PR:N) and root code execution yields C/I/A:H.
Primary rating from Vendor (juniper).
CVSS VectorVendor: juniper
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
An Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability in the phone-home daemon (phcd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved on EX Series, SRX Series, and QFX Series allows an adjacent unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges via a rogue DHCP server.
Executive ViewAI
Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved devices (EX, SRX, and QFX Series) are affected by a high-severity OS command injection vulnerability in the phcd phone-home daemon. An attacker on the same Layer-2 broadcast domain could execute commands as root if the device is actively running phone-home or zero-touch provisioning (ZTP), potentially leading to full device compromise and lateral movement. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and patch available per vendor advisory (JSA112187), making timely patching the top priority for leadership.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.
Unauthenticated remote code execution with root privileges affects Juniper Networks Junos OS devices that expose the J-W
Heap-based buffer overflow in the sdxd service-deployment daemon of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allow
A stack-based buffer overflow in the srxpfe packet forwarding process of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series devices
Unauthenticated remote code execution with elevated privileges is possible in Juniper Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved thro
Remote root code execution in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Junos OS is reachable through protocol-valid
Remote code execution (on Junos OS) and rpd denial of service (on Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved) result from a stack-bas
Remote code execution with root privileges on Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved is possible when the routin
Remote code execution and denial of service in Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved arise from a stack-based b
Unauthenticated remote attackers can gain root-level configuration access and fully compromise Juniper Junos OS and Juno
Integer underflow in the Junos OS kernel can crash a device when the Extended Echo feature (RFC 8335 ICMP probing) is co
Heap-based buffer overflow in Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series devices that have Secure Vector Routing (SVR) enab
Stack-based buffer overflow in Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved BGP flowspec handling allows a configured
EUVD-2026-101385
GHSA-w9fm-9w6m-778h
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB