Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessGain foothold on adjacent network segment
-
DeliverySend crafted request to SQL Server
-
ExploitTrigger out-of-bounds read in memory parser
-
ExecutionReceive leaked adjacent memory in response
-
ImpactDisclose sensitive information
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, read limits
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Collection The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to be on an adjacent network (same subnet/broadcast domain or logically adjacent segment, per AV:A) with network reachability to the SQL Server listener; it cannot be performed from an arbitrary internet host. No authentication is required (PR:N) and no user interaction is needed (UI:N). The key LIMITING factor is High attack complexity (AC:H): successful exploitation depends on conditions the attacker does not control, such as specific memory layout, timing, or server state, so the leak is not reliably reproducible on demand. The vulnerability discloses memory contents only (C:H, I:N, A:N) and does not permit modification or denial of service. The specific SQL Server feature, protocol component, or request type that triggers the out-of-bounds read is not detailed in the MSRC description provided. |
| Impact | This is a moderate-severity information-disclosure flaw (CWE-125 out-of-bounds read) carrying a vendor CVSS 3.1 base score of 5.3 with vector AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N. The signals are internally consistent and point toward low real-world urgency: the attack vector is Adjacent (AV:A), meaning the attacker must be on the same logical/physical network segment rather than exploiting across the open internet, and attack complexity is High (AC:H), indicating success depends on conditions outside the attacker's direct control. CISA's SSVC decision framework reinforces this - Exploitation is rated 'none', Automatable is 'no', and Technical Impact is only 'partial' - which argues against prioritizing emergency remediation. There is no CISA KEV listing and no public exploit identified at time of analysis, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. No EPSS score was provided in the input, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood could not be weighed; absence of EPSS is a data gap, not evidence of low risk. The impact is confidentiality-only (C:H, I:N, A:N): a successful attacker reads memory they should not, with no integrity or availability consequence. Net assessment: a genuine but non-urgent patch-in-normal-cycle issue, not a drop-everything priority - the combination of adjacent-only vector, high complexity, 'none' exploitation status, and confidentiality-only impact all align downward. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker already positioned on the same adjacent network segment as a vulnerable SQL Server instance sends specially crafted input that triggers an out-of-bounds read in the server's memory handling, causing the server to return adjacent memory contents in its response. Because attack complexity is High, the attacker must satisfy specific timing or state conditions to leak meaningful data, and repeated attempts may be needed to recover useful information. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026
An out-of-bounds read in Microsoft SQL Server exposes memory contents to unauthenticated attackers who can reach the server's database listener from an adjacent network segment. The flaw is rated CVSS 3.1 base 5.3 (AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N), so the disclosure is high-impact confidentiality only - there is no integrity or availability effect - and exploitability is constrained by High attack complexity, meaning success depends on server memory layout, timing, or state that the attacker cannot control, making the leak non-deterministic rather than reliably repeatable. Microsoft has published a fix through its update guide, and there is no public exploit code and no confirmed active exploitation (no POC, no CISA KEV; CISA SSVC records Exploitation: none).
RemediationAI
Patch available per vendor advisory: apply the Microsoft SQL Server security update published in the MSRC Update Guide for CVE-2026-88086 (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-88086), selecting the build that matches the servicing track in use - cumulative-update customers within the version ranges listed above, and GDR-baseline customers within the separate GDR ranges (for example SQL Server 2019 GDR from 15.0.0 below 15.0.2200.2, SQL Server 2022 GDR from 16.0.0 below 16.0.1210.3, and SQL Server 2025 GDR from 17.0.1050.2 below 17.0.1145.4) - and confirm the post-update build is at or above the fixed boundary for that branch rather than assuming a single CU applies to all deployments. Because the attack vector is Adjacent (AV:A) and no authentication is needed, the most effective compensating control before patching is network segmentation: restrict the SQL Server listener (default TCP 1433, plus any configured static or dynamic ports and the SQL Browser/UDP 1434 service) so that only trusted application subnets and administrative hosts can reach it, blocking client VLANs, guest wireless, and any logically adjacent segment - the trade-off is that overly broad segmentation rules will break legitimate clients and cross-subnet application traffic, so the ACLs must be derived from an inventory of actual database consumers. Where feasible, disable or firewall the SQL Browser service and limit non-TCP endpoints and named-pipe/shared-memory protocols, since reducing reachable endpoints shrinks the AV:A surface, at the cost of losing dynamic-port discovery for some clients. Do not rely on traffic encryption or authentication hardening as a mitigation, since the flaw is pre-authentication and the vector is adjacent-network reachability; also note that the High attack complexity means exploitation is not reliably reproducible, so absence of observed attempts is not evidence of safety. Monitor database server logs and network flow data for anomalous adjacent-subnet connections to the SQL listener, and consult the vendor advisory for any additional Microsoft-supplied workarounds specific to the affected component, since the exact triggering feature is not disclosed.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 6 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause is CWE-125, an out-of-bounds read, which means the SQL Server process reads memory beyond the bounds of an allocated buffer and can return that adjacent memory to the caller - a classic information-disclosure primitive that does not corrupt state or crash the service. The affected surface is the SQL Server listener/communication stack reachable over the network, and the vulnerability is classified under the Buffer Overflow and Information Disclosure tags. The CVSS vector places the attack vector at Adjacent (AV:A), which in CVSS terms means the attacker must reside on the same subnet, broadcast domain, or a logically adjacent network segment with reachability to the database endpoint; the flaw is not exploitable from an arbitrary internet host. No authentication (PR:N) and no user interaction (UI:N) are required, but High attack complexity (AC:H) is the dominant limiter: conditions such as specific heap/layout state, request timing, or server state must align, so the read is opportunistic rather than deterministic. The specific SQL Server feature, protocol component, or request pattern that triggers the read is not detailed in the MSRC advisory data available, so the precise trigger remains uncharacterized. The independent assessment confirms scope is unchanged (S:U) with high confidentiality impact only and no modification or denial-of-service capability.
Know when Sql Server gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Adjacent vector and high complexity match the described adjacent-network memory leak; PR:N as the flaw is unauthorized; confidentiality-only impact with no integrity or availability effect.
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Out-of-bounds read in SQL Server allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over an adjacent network.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
More in Sql Server
View allA remote code execution vulnerability exists in Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services when it incorrectly handles page
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Microsoft SQL Server when it incorrectly handles processing of internal
Microsoft SQL Server 2008 SP3, 2008 R2 SP2, and 2012 SP1 does not properly control use of stack memory for processing of
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the SQL Server Report Manager in Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Reporting Service
The agent in Microsoft SQL Server 2012 SP2, 2012 SP3, 2014 SP1, 2014 SP2, and 2016 does not properly check the atxcore.d
Microsoft SQL Server 2012 SP2 and 2012 SP3 does not properly perform a cast of an unspecified pointer, which allows remo
Microsoft SQL Server 2014 SP1, 2014 SP2, and 2016 does not properly perform a cast of an unspecified pointer, which allo
Microsoft SQL Server 2016 does not properly perform a cast of an unspecified pointer, which allows remote authenticated
Microsoft SQL Server 2008 SP3 and SP4, 2008 R2 SP2 and SP3, 2012 SP1 and SP2, and 2014 does not prevent use of uninitial
Microsoft SQL Server 2016 mishandles the FILESTREAM path, which allows remote authenticated users to gain privileges via
A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the Microsoft SQL Server that could allow remote code execution on an affected
Microsoft SQL Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerability is remotely
EUVD-2026-100614
GHSA-9c49-wqxr-2c45
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB