Skip to main content

Windows Media Foundation EUVDEUVD-2026-100355

| CVE-2026-102201 HIGH
Use After Free (CWE-416)
2026-10-13 secure@microsoft.com GHSA-rvgc-3273-xhqp
7.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: microsoft
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate as low-privileged local user
  2. Delivery
    Invoke crafted media/Media Foundation operation
  3. Exploit
    Trigger use-after-free (CWE-416)
  4. Execution
    Execute attacker-controlled code in elevated context
  5. Impact
    Gain SYSTEM privileges

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Memory lifecycle management
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires the attacker to already have local, authenticated low-privileged code execution on the target Windows system (CVSS PR:L, AV:L) - this is a local escalation primitive, not remotely reachable. Exploitation involves triggering the use-after-free within Windows Media Foundation, which typically means causing the system or the attacker's process to invoke Media Foundation parsing/playback or its APIs; no user interaction is required (UI:N) and attack complexity is low (AC:L). Limiting factors: there is no remote network vector, the attacker needs a pre-existing foothold with the ability to run code, and exploitation is confined to the local host (scope unchanged, S:U).

Impact

This is a locally-exploitable privilege-escalation flaw (CVSS 3.1 7.8, High) with vector AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H. The vector confirms the attacker must already have local, low-privileged code execution (PR:L) on the target - this is not a remote entry point but a second-stage escalation primitive. Attack complexity is low and no user interaction is required, so once a foothold exists, reliable exploitation is plausible. However, several high-value triage signals are MISSING from the input: no EPSS exploitation-probability score is provided, the vulnerability is NOT listed in CISA KEV, and no public proof-of-concept is referenced (the only reference is the Microsoft MSRC update-guide page). Therefore there is no confirmed active exploitation and no evidence of a public exploit at time of analysis. Priority should be driven by the product's ubiquity (Windows Media Foundation ships in every Windows install) and its classic role in post-compromise SYSTEM escalation chains, rather than by any confirmed exploitation signal. Note a minor data inconsistency: the input Tags include 'Denial Of Service,' but the description and the C:H/I:H/A:H impact describe privilege elevation, not a DoS - treat the DoS tag with caution.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has already obtained low-privileged code execution on a Windows host (e.g., via phishing or an initial-access exploit) invokes Windows Media Foundation in a way that triggers the use-after-free in CWE-416, corrupting memory to run attacker-controlled code at a higher privilege level and obtain SYSTEM. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, and the low attack complexity (AC:L) with no required user interaction makes reliable exploitation feasible once a foothold exists.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 13, 2026

Local privilege escalation in Microsoft Windows Media Foundation (CVSS 3.1 7.8, High) lets an attacker who already holds low-privileged authenticated code execution on a Windows host corrupt memory via a use-after-free and elevate to a higher-integrity context. The flaw requires no user interaction (UI:N) and has low attack complexity (AC:L), but it is strictly local - there is no network vector and scope remains unchanged, so a pre-existing foothold is a hard prerequisite. Exploitation status: no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not listed as confirmed actively exploited (CISA KEV); risk is therefore primarily relevant to post-compromise escalation and defense-evasion chains rather than initial access.

RemediationAI

Apply the Microsoft security update for CVE-2026-102201 as published in the Microsoft Security Update Guide (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-102201); the provided data points to a vendor advisory but does not specify the exact patched build, so the precise fixed version must be taken from that advisory rather than assumed. Because the flaw is a local, low-privilege escalation primitive requiring an existing foothold, the highest-value compensating controls focus on blunting that foothold: enforce Windows Defender Application Control or AppLocker in allow-list mode so unprivileged users cannot execute arbitrary binaries that would invoke Media Foundation, at the cost of administrative overhead and potential breakage of legitimate line-of-business applications; enable Attack Surface Reduction rules and browser/Office hardening that restrict untrusted media content processing, accepting some usability impact for media-heavy workflows; and apply least privilege and remove unnecessary local administrative rights so a successful escalation yields less. Disabling Media Foundation outright is not a practical mitigation because it breaks core multimedia functionality and should only be considered in hardened kiosk or server contexts where media playback is genuinely unneeded. Monitor for abnormal media-stack process crashes, since repeated Media Foundation faults are a common signal of use-after-free triggering attempts.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 10 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Windows Media Foundation is the multimedia platform that underpins audio/video decoding, media parsing, and playback across Windows, exposing components such as mfplat.dll, mf.dll, mfcore.dll, and the Media Foundation Transform (MFT) pipeline used by players, browsers, and the media stack. CVE-2026-102201 is a use-after-free (CWE-416): an object's lifetime is mismanaged so that memory is released while a stale pointer remains reachable, and the freed region is later dereferenced. In a media-processing context this typically arises from flawed reference counting or teardown ordering when a media source, stream, or transform is destroyed while another thread or callback still holds a reference. Successful re-use of the freed allocation can redirect execution or corrupt adjacent structures, yielding code execution at the privilege level of the Media Foundation-hosting process rather than the attacker's constrained context. The assessed vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) confirms the primitive is local, low-privilege-triggered, requires no user interaction, and is limited to the same security scope, so it functions as an escalation step within a broader intrusion rather than a standalone remote compromise.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.8 HIGH
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.8 HIGH

Local escalation requires a pre-existing low-privileged foothold (AV:L, PR:L); no user interaction and a reliable memory-corruption primitive justify AC:L/UI:N with full SYSTEM-level C/I/A impact.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:17 nvd
HIGH 7.8

DescriptionCVE.org

Use after free in Microsoft Windows Media Foundation allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A local privilege-escalation flaw in Microsoft Windows Media Foundation (CVE-2026-102201) allows an attacker who already has low-privileged code execution on a Windows host to escalate to a higher-integrity context. No vendor patch and no public exploit are currently identified, so the immediate business risk is concentrated in post-compromise escalation and defense evasion rather than remote or initial access. Leadership should prioritize compensating controls, least privilege, and detection for environments where attackers may already have a foothold.

Business Impact: Medium
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: enforce least privilege and remove local admin rights; apply application control (WDAC/AppLocker) to block unapproved executables; enable Exploit Protection mitigations (CFG, DEP, ASLR) for Windows processes; restrict interactive logon and service/task permissions; monitor Windows Error Reporting and EDR for Media Foundation crashes, integrity-level changes, and privilege-escalation behavior; maintain heightened detection for post-compromise defense evasion until a patch is released.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 77% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
core Windows multimedia component present in all Windows installations
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
Medium
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

39
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +39
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Use-after-free vulnerabilities occur when a program continues to access memory through a pointer after that memory has been deallocated.

Memory corruption occurs when a program writes data beyond the boundaries of allocated memory regions or accesses memory in unintended ways, violating the integrity of the process's address space.

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2025-13315 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-13316 HIGH POC
8.2 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy