Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate as local user
  2. Delivery
    Invoke vulnerable DFS code path
  3. Exploit
    Overflow heap buffer (CWE-122)
  4. Execution
    Corrupt memory structures
  5. Impact
    Execute code as SYSTEM

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Heap buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires an attacker to already have authenticated local access to an affected Windows system and to reach the Distributed File System (DFS) code path that mishandles the heap allocation; exploitation is local only (AV:L) with no user interaction and no network vector. Limiting factors: the attacker must hold valid credentials on the host and, per Microsoft's PR:H rating, meaningful existing privileges, which confines realistic risk to multi-user, terminal-server, or shared-workstation scenarios where an untrusted authenticated principal is present; it cannot be triggered remotely or by an unauthenticated user. Affected builds span Windows 10/11 (1607 through 26H2), Windows Server 2012 through 2025 including Server Core - patch before the listed fixed builds (e.g., 10.0.26100.33650 for Server 2025).

Impact

This is a moderate-priority, local privilege-escalation issue rather than a top-tier emergency. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 6.7) confirms the attacker must already be local and, per Microsoft's own scoring, already hold high privileges - so this is a privilege-elevation step inside an existing foothold, not a remote entry point. The SSVC framework reinforces a measured response: Exploitation=none (no observed activity) and Automatable=no (cannot be mass-scripted at scale), even though Technical Impact=total, matching the full C/I/A compromise once triggered. No EPSS score was provided in the input, there is no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC is referenced, so all three widespread-exploitation signals are absent and aligned - nothing conflicts here. The one point worth flagging is the PR:H choice: 'authorized attacker' in the description only establishes authentication, not necessarily high privilege, so defenders should treat the privilege bar as 'authenticated local user' and verify the exact required privilege with Microsoft rather than assuming admin-only reachability. Overall: patch on a normal cadence, prioritizing multi-user and terminal-server hosts where untrusted authenticated users share a machine.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An authenticated local user on a Windows host runs a crafted program that drives the DFS client/component into processing malformed data, triggering the heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122) to corrupt memory and gain SYSTEM-level code execution. Because the CVSS vector is AV:L with no user interaction (UI:N), the attack is a local, self-contained chain against an already-logged-in session, most dangerous on shared or multi-user systems. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, so this remains a plausible but not yet demonstrated path.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 13, 2026

Local privilege escalation in the Windows Distributed File System (DFS) lets an authenticated attacker with valid host credentials trigger a heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122) and elevate to SYSTEM on unpatched Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server builds. Exploitation is local only with no user interaction and, per Microsoft's advisory, requires existing high privileges, so realistic exposure is limited to shared, multi-user, or terminal-server hosts where an untrusted authenticated principal is present. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis and CISA's SSVC rates exploitation as none; vendor patches are available.

RemediationAI

Apply the vendor patch from Microsoft's MSRC update guide; no other remediation eliminates the flaw. Exact fixed builds per family are 10.0.14393.9612 (Windows 10 1607/Server 2016), 10.0.17763.9376 (Windows 10 1809/Server 2019), 10.0.19044.7807 (Windows 10 21H2/22H2), 10.0.22631.7652 (Windows 11 23H2), 10.0.26100.9711 (Windows 11 24H2/25H2/26H2) and 10.0.26100.33650 (Server 2025), 10.0.28000.3231 (Windows 11 26H1), 10.0.20348.5761 (Server 2022), 6.2.9200.26434 (Server 2012), and 6.3.9600.23470 (Server 2012 R2). Until patching, compensate for the local, credentialed prerequisite by restricting interactive logon rights on DFS hosts-especially Remote Desktop Session Hosts and shared workstations-to trusted administrators, removing unnecessary local accounts, and enabling auditing of DFS service crashes or heap-corruption events as a possible exploitation signal; the trade-off is reduced flexibility for legitimate multi-user access. There is no practical way to disable DFS on domain controllers or enterprise file servers without breaking namespace and replication services, so patch cadence should follow Microsoft's standard monthly release cycle; no public exploit code has been identified, which lowers but does not remove the urgency for multi-user hosts.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 20 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The Windows Distributed File System (DFS) is a set of client and server components-DFS Namespaces and DFS Replication-that presents a unified namespace across multiple SMB shares and replicates data between servers. The flaw is a heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122) in a DFS code path that mishandles allocation and copying of attacker-influenced data, allowing a local caller to overwrite adjacent heap metadata and gain code execution in the context of the affected service or kernel component. The CVSS vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) and the independent assessment agree on local access, low attack complexity, no user interaction, and total confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact, with the main disagreement being privilege prerequisites: Microsoft rates PR:H while our assessment uses PR:L, meaning an ordinary authenticated user may be sufficient in practice. There is no network vector and no unauthenticated path, so the issue is a post-compromise escalation primitive rather than a remote entry point; the ENISA EUVD entry mirrors the MSRC advisory and the affected build list.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 6.7 MEDIUM
AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.8 HIGH

Local authenticated trigger with no interaction and full SYSTEM compromise; assessed PR:L since 'authorized attacker' confirms authentication but not the high privilege Microsoft assigned.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:22 cve.org
MEDIUM 6.7

DescriptionCVE.org

Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Distributed File System (DFS) allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 75% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Core Microsoft Windows client and server OS across nearly all environments
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

34
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +34
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

A heap overflow occurs when a program writes data beyond the bounds of a buffer allocated in the heap memory region.

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2025-13315 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-13316 HIGH POC
8.2 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy