Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessReach DHCP service over network
-
DeliverySend crafted DHCP packets
-
ExploitTrigger use-after-free in handler
-
ExecutionWin heap race, control freed object
-
ImpactExecute arbitrary code in service context
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Memory lifecycle management
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | The target host must be running the Windows DHCP Server role (not installed/enabled by default on a base Windows Server) and be reachable on the DHCP service by the attacker, typically meaning the attacker is positioned on a network segment that can deliver DHCP traffic to the server. No authentication is required (PR:N) and no user interaction is needed (UI:N), so any unauthenticated network-adjacent attacker qualifies. The primary limiting factor is the high attack complexity (AC:H): reliably triggering and exploiting the use-after-free requires winning a timing/heap-state race and defeating Windows memory-protection mitigations, so exploitation is conditional on the specific pre-patch build (e.g., Server 2025 <10.0.26100.33650, Server 2019 <10.0.17763.9376) and on successful heap grooming rather than a single deterministic request. |
| Impact | This is a credible, high-priority vulnerability but not a drop-everything emergency based on current signals. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N) describes a network-reachable, unauthenticated flaw in Windows DHCP Server with full C:H/I:H/A:H impact, consistent with the CWE-416 use-after-free that can be driven to remote code execution. The key dampener is AC:H: use-after-free RCE in a network service almost always requires winning a memory-state race and defeating modern Windows mitigations (ASLR, heap hardening, CFG), which makes reliable weaponization non-trivial. Exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis' - the CVE is NOT in CISA KEV and no POC is referenced, and no EPSS score was supplied, so the real-world exploitation-probability signal is MISSING and cannot be used to raise or lower priority. No SSVC decision data (automatable, exploitation, technical impact) was provided in the input. Signals are internally consistent (no CVSS-vs-description conflict), so the main uncertainty is operational: the raw 8.1 score overstates near-term ease of exploitation given AC:H and the absence of any observed exploit activity. Treat as a priority patch for any host running the DHCP Server role, but widespread opportunistic exploitation is not currently evidenced. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker with network access to a Windows Server running the DHCP Server role sends a sequence of crafted DHCP packets designed to trigger the use-after-free in the service, corrupting freed heap memory. By grooming the heap and winning the required timing window (reflected in the high attack complexity), the attacker coerces the freed object's reuse into controlled code execution in the DHCP service context. No public exploit code is identified at the time of analysis, and no authentication is required (PR:N). |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 13, 2026
Remote code execution in Windows DHCP Server is possible through a use-after-free that can be triggered by unauthenticated, network-adjacent attackers against Windows Server systems where the optional DHCP Server role is enabled and reachable. The assessed CVSS vector is AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact, and affected builds include Windows Server 2012 through Server 2025, including Server Core installations. Vendor patches are available, and available intelligence indicates no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no confirmed active exploitation, so this is a credible high-priority patching target rather than an emergency under active attack.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: apply the Microsoft security update referenced from https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-88117 to bring affected systems to the fixed build or later: Windows Server 2012 to 6.2.9200.26434 or later, Windows Server 2012 R2 to 6.3.9600.23470 or later, Windows Server 2016 to 10.0.14393.9612 or later, Windows Server 2019 to 10.0.17763.9376 or later, Windows Server 2022 to 10.0.20348.5761 or later, and Windows Server 2025 to 10.0.26100.33650 or later, covering Server Core installations with the same builds. If immediate patching is not possible, disable the DHCP Server role on any Windows Server host that is not intentionally serving DHCP, recognizing that this removes DHCP service for dependent clients; alternatively, segment and firewall DHCP traffic so only trusted DHCP relay agents and client subnets can reach the server, with the trade-off that overly strict filtering can break legitimate DHCP lease assignment. Monitor DHCP service crashes or unexpected restarts as a potential exploitation indicator, but do not rely on monitoring as a substitute for patching because the flaw is a memory-corruption condition that may not produce clear pre-exploitation telemetry. No standalone vendor workaround was provided in the input data.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 11 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause is CWE-416, a use-after-free in the Windows DHCP Server service. DHCP is a UDP-based network service used by clients to obtain IP addresses; the flaw means a memory object is freed and later reused in a way that can corrupt memory and potentially execute code in the service context. The CVSS vector specifies PR:N and UI:N, so unauthenticated attackers require no credentials or user interaction, but AC:H reflects that reliable exploitation depends on winning a timing or heap-state race and defeating Windows memory-protection mitigations rather than sending a single deterministic packet. EUVD version ranges identify affected pre-patch builds across Windows Server 2012, 2012 R2, 2016, 2019, 2022, and 2025, with Server Core installations sharing the same build boundaries; no CPE strings were supplied in the source data. The DHCP Server role is not enabled by default, so exposure is limited to hosts where that role has been installed and the DHCP service is reachable by the attacker.
Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Network-reachable, unauthenticated DHCP service (AV:N/PR:N/UI:N); AC:H because the use-after-free requires winning a race/heap state; RCE yields full C:H/I:H/A:H.
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Use after free in Windows DHCP Server allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Executive ViewAI
A high-severity remote code execution flaw in the Windows DHCP Server role (CVE-2026-88117) exposes Windows Server 2012 through 2025 systems - including Server Core builds - to unauthenticated, network-adjacent attackers, with the potential for full compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Any organization running the DHCP Server role on reachable servers is affected, meaning a successful attack could disrupt IP address assignment for entire network segments and provide an attacker a foothold on critical infrastructure servers. Vendor patches are available and there is no confirmed active exploitation or public exploit code today, so leadership should treat this as a high-priority, scheduled patch initiative rather than an emergency incident.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Use-after-free vulnerabilities occur when a program continues to access memory through a pointer after that memory has been deallocated.
Memory corruption occurs when a program writes data beyond the boundaries of allocated memory regions or accesses memory in unintended ways, violating the integrity of the process's address space.
Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio
Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in
A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr
Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables
Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker
Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b
An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote
FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit
Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio
Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred
Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/
React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo
EUVD-2026-100152
GHSA-rg27-5rxq-2gc9
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB