Skip to main content

Windows RPC Runtime EUVDEUVD-2026-100045

| CVE-2026-83908 HIGH
Release of Invalid Pointer or Reference (CWE-763)
2026-10-13 secure@microsoft.com GHSA-hpc7-h6cp-rfr6
7.0
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: microsoft
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate as low-privileged local user
  2. Delivery
    Invoke vulnerable RPC Runtime interface
  3. Exploit
    Win race triggering invalid pointer release
  4. Execution
    Corrupt memory via dangling reference
  5. Impact
    Execute code as SYSTEM

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Pointer release safety
Exploitation Conditions

Requires the attacker to already possess low-privileged authenticated local access to the Windows host (AV:L, PR:L) and to exploit the RPC Runtime code path that releases an invalid pointer/reference (CWE-763). Exploitation is materially limited by high attack complexity (AC:H) - consistent with a race or timing-dependent condition that is not reliably repeatable - and by the need for a pre-existing local foothold; it cannot be triggered remotely or by an unauthenticated user. No user interaction is required (UI:N), and scope is unchanged (S:U), so success yields local SYSTEM-level escalation on the same host rather than cross-component impact.

Impact

Signals are consistent and point to a genuine but non-urgent priority. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 7.0 HIGH) describes a local, authenticated privilege-escalation requiring an already-foothold attacker and a high-complexity (likely race/timing-dependent, per CWE-763 release of invalid pointer) trigger. CISA SSVC reinforces lower urgency: Exploitation=none and Automatable=no, while Technical Impact=total aligns with the full C:H/I:H/A:H impact of a successful SYSTEM-level escalation. There is no CISA KEV listing and no POC referenced, so this is no public exploit identified at time of analysis - not active exploitation. No EPSS score was provided in the input, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood cannot be quantified here. The AC:H plus Automatable=no combination argues against reliable mass exploitation, consistent with a bug that would be chained by a motivated attacker who already has code execution rather than used for initial access. Net: a real patch-worthy EoP for defense-in-depth, but not a drop-everything emergency absent evidence of exploitation.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has already gained low-privileged authenticated code execution on a Windows host (e.g., via phishing or a separate initial-access bug) locally invokes the vulnerable RPC Runtime path and wins a timing-sensitive condition that causes an invalid pointer/reference to be released, corrupting memory to elevate to SYSTEM. The high attack complexity (AC:H) means the race may require multiple attempts, and no public exploit code is currently identified, so this is most plausible as a post-compromise escalation step.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026

Local privilege escalation in the Windows RPC Runtime lets an attacker who already holds a low-privileged local account on a Windows host free an invalid pointer or reference (CWE-763) inside the RPC code path and turn that memory-management error into SYSTEM-level code execution on the same machine (CVSS 7.0, AV:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U). Exploitation is gated by high attack complexity (AC:H), which is consistent with a race/timing-dependent condition rather than a reliable one-shot primitive, and it cannot be reached remotely or by an unauthenticated user. No public exploit code or confirmed active exploitation has been identified at time of analysis (SSVC exploitation: none), and Microsoft has released fixes through its monthly update channel, so this is a genuine but non-urgent patching priority concentrated on multi-user, RDP and jump hosts where untrusted standard users can log on locally.

RemediationAI

Apply the vendor-released Microsoft security update for CVE-2026-83908 from the MSRC update guide (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-83908) - the EUVD data indicates fixed builds at or above 10.0.26100.33650 for Windows Server 2025, 10.0.20348.5761 for Server 2022, 10.0.14393.9612 for Windows 10 1607 / Server 2016, 10.0.17763.9376 for Windows 10 1809 / Server 2019, 10.0.19044.7807 for Windows 10 21H2/22H2, 10.0.22631.7652 for Windows 11 23H2, 10.0.26100.9711 for Windows 11 24H2, 10.0.26200.9711 for Windows 11 25H2, 10.0.26300.9711 for Windows 11 26H2, 10.0.28000.3231 for Windows 11 26H1, 6.2.9200.26434 for Server 2012 and 6.3.9600.23470 for Server 2012 R2, so install the current cumulative update for each branch rather than a single package. Because the bug requires an existing low-privileged local account and high attack complexity, there is no practical network-side mitigation and no configuration switch that disables the RPC Runtime without breaking DCOM, WMI, SMB-based management and service control - the only meaningful interim controls are to reduce the population of unprivileged local users on high-value hosts (remove unnecessary interactive/RDP logon rights, disable credential sharing, enforce just-enough-administration and separate admin accounts) and to restrict who can log on to multi-user systems such as Remote Desktop Session Hosts, jump servers and build agents, which lowers the chance an attacker ever satisfies PR:L. Scheduling patch deployment first on those same shared and multi-user systems, plus on Windows Server 2012/2012 R2 hosts that may now be out of extended support, is the highest-value sequencing; note that the extended-support caveat means those older branches require an ESU-entitled update rather than a routine cumulative update. There is no public exploit code or KEV confirmation to drive emergency out-of-band action, so a normal monthly maintenance cycle is appropriate, but validating build numbers after deployment is recommended given the separate servicing branches for the 10.0.26100-based products.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 20 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw is a CWE-763 'release of invalid pointer or reference' in the Windows RPC Runtime - the rpcrt4.dll/RPCRT4 runtime that underpins virtually every Windows remote procedure call surface, including DCOM/COM activation, WMI, SMB-related RPC endpoints, Task Scheduler and countless service control interfaces. In this bug class the runtime frees a pointer that is stale, already-freed, or never valid (a double-free / use-after-free-adjacent condition), which corrupts the process heap and can be steered into an arbitrary write; because a large portion of RPC server code runs at SYSTEM privilege, a successful write in that context converts into full local elevation. The assessed vector CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H is internally consistent with that model: local attack vector and low privileges required mean the adversary must already be running code in a standard user context on the target, AC:H indicates a race or timing window that is not reliably repeatable, UI:N means no victim action is needed once the foothold exists, and S:U means the elevation stays inside the same host's security authority rather than crossing a component boundary. Affected builds span Windows 10 (1607 through 22H2), Windows 11 (23H2, 24H2, 25H2, 26H1, 26H2), and Windows Server 2012, 2012 R2, 2016, 2019, 2022 and 2025 including Server Core installations, per the EUVD version data, i.e. essentially the entire supported Windows servicing tree shares the same RPC runtime lineage. Note that the supplied tag 'Information Disclosure' does not match a CWE-763 elevation-of-privilege issue and should not be relied on; the vendor's own CWE and CVSS impact metrics govern. No CISA KEV entry, no EPSS-driven urgency signal, and no public proof-of-concept were provided, so the practical risk is low-to-moderate and dominated by asset exposure (how many unprivileged local users can touch a given host) rather than by exploitation momentum.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.0 HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.0 HIGH

Local authenticated foothold required (AV:L, PR:L); CWE-763 pointer-release bug is timing-dependent giving AC:H; successful escalation yields full C:H/I:H/A:H with unchanged scope.

3.1 AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:20 cve.org
HIGH 7.0

DescriptionCVE.org

Release of invalid pointer or reference in RPC Runtime allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

CVE-2026-83908 in the Windows RPC Runtime allows a low-privileged local user to escalate to SYSTEM on affected Windows hosts, concentrating risk on multi-user, RDP, and jump servers where untrusted accounts can log on locally. Although severity is HIGH and exploitation requires high complexity, no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no confirmed actively exploited (CISA KEV) status means leadership should treat this as a prioritized patch-management issue rather than an emergency. Organizations with shared Windows environments should care because a successful escalation would give an attacker full control of the host and any credentials or data accessible from it.

Business Impact: Medium
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 82% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
RPC Runtime ships in every supported Windows client and server edition
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
Medium
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

35
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +35
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

CVE-2026-96951 HIGH POC
8.8 Oct 13

Command injection in the Windows Shell lets remote, unauthenticated attackers bypass a Windows security feature and then

CVE-2025-24054 MEDIUM POC
6.5 Mar 11

External control of file name or path in Windows NTLM allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy