Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate as low-privileged local user
-
DeliveryInvoke vulnerable RPC Runtime interface
-
ExploitWin race triggering invalid pointer release
-
ExecutionCorrupt memory via dangling reference
-
ImpactExecute code as SYSTEM
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Pointer release safety
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires the attacker to already possess low-privileged authenticated local access to the Windows host (AV:L, PR:L) and to exploit the RPC Runtime code path that releases an invalid pointer/reference (CWE-763). Exploitation is materially limited by high attack complexity (AC:H) - consistent with a race or timing-dependent condition that is not reliably repeatable - and by the need for a pre-existing local foothold; it cannot be triggered remotely or by an unauthenticated user. No user interaction is required (UI:N), and scope is unchanged (S:U), so success yields local SYSTEM-level escalation on the same host rather than cross-component impact. |
| Impact | Signals are consistent and point to a genuine but non-urgent priority. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 7.0 HIGH) describes a local, authenticated privilege-escalation requiring an already-foothold attacker and a high-complexity (likely race/timing-dependent, per CWE-763 release of invalid pointer) trigger. CISA SSVC reinforces lower urgency: Exploitation=none and Automatable=no, while Technical Impact=total aligns with the full C:H/I:H/A:H impact of a successful SYSTEM-level escalation. There is no CISA KEV listing and no POC referenced, so this is no public exploit identified at time of analysis - not active exploitation. No EPSS score was provided in the input, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood cannot be quantified here. The AC:H plus Automatable=no combination argues against reliable mass exploitation, consistent with a bug that would be chained by a motivated attacker who already has code execution rather than used for initial access. Net: a real patch-worthy EoP for defense-in-depth, but not a drop-everything emergency absent evidence of exploitation. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who has already gained low-privileged authenticated code execution on a Windows host (e.g., via phishing or a separate initial-access bug) locally invokes the vulnerable RPC Runtime path and wins a timing-sensitive condition that causes an invalid pointer/reference to be released, corrupting memory to elevate to SYSTEM. The high attack complexity (AC:H) means the race may require multiple attempts, and no public exploit code is currently identified, so this is most plausible as a post-compromise escalation step. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026
Local privilege escalation in the Windows RPC Runtime lets an attacker who already holds a low-privileged local account on a Windows host free an invalid pointer or reference (CWE-763) inside the RPC code path and turn that memory-management error into SYSTEM-level code execution on the same machine (CVSS 7.0, AV:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U). Exploitation is gated by high attack complexity (AC:H), which is consistent with a race/timing-dependent condition rather than a reliable one-shot primitive, and it cannot be reached remotely or by an unauthenticated user. No public exploit code or confirmed active exploitation has been identified at time of analysis (SSVC exploitation: none), and Microsoft has released fixes through its monthly update channel, so this is a genuine but non-urgent patching priority concentrated on multi-user, RDP and jump hosts where untrusted standard users can log on locally.
RemediationAI
Apply the vendor-released Microsoft security update for CVE-2026-83908 from the MSRC update guide (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-83908) - the EUVD data indicates fixed builds at or above 10.0.26100.33650 for Windows Server 2025, 10.0.20348.5761 for Server 2022, 10.0.14393.9612 for Windows 10 1607 / Server 2016, 10.0.17763.9376 for Windows 10 1809 / Server 2019, 10.0.19044.7807 for Windows 10 21H2/22H2, 10.0.22631.7652 for Windows 11 23H2, 10.0.26100.9711 for Windows 11 24H2, 10.0.26200.9711 for Windows 11 25H2, 10.0.26300.9711 for Windows 11 26H2, 10.0.28000.3231 for Windows 11 26H1, 6.2.9200.26434 for Server 2012 and 6.3.9600.23470 for Server 2012 R2, so install the current cumulative update for each branch rather than a single package. Because the bug requires an existing low-privileged local account and high attack complexity, there is no practical network-side mitigation and no configuration switch that disables the RPC Runtime without breaking DCOM, WMI, SMB-based management and service control - the only meaningful interim controls are to reduce the population of unprivileged local users on high-value hosts (remove unnecessary interactive/RDP logon rights, disable credential sharing, enforce just-enough-administration and separate admin accounts) and to restrict who can log on to multi-user systems such as Remote Desktop Session Hosts, jump servers and build agents, which lowers the chance an attacker ever satisfies PR:L. Scheduling patch deployment first on those same shared and multi-user systems, plus on Windows Server 2012/2012 R2 hosts that may now be out of extended support, is the highest-value sequencing; note that the extended-support caveat means those older branches require an ESU-entitled update rather than a routine cumulative update. There is no public exploit code or KEV confirmation to drive emergency out-of-band action, so a normal monthly maintenance cycle is appropriate, but validating build numbers after deployment is recommended given the separate servicing branches for the 10.0.26100-based products.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 20 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The flaw is a CWE-763 'release of invalid pointer or reference' in the Windows RPC Runtime - the rpcrt4.dll/RPCRT4 runtime that underpins virtually every Windows remote procedure call surface, including DCOM/COM activation, WMI, SMB-related RPC endpoints, Task Scheduler and countless service control interfaces. In this bug class the runtime frees a pointer that is stale, already-freed, or never valid (a double-free / use-after-free-adjacent condition), which corrupts the process heap and can be steered into an arbitrary write; because a large portion of RPC server code runs at SYSTEM privilege, a successful write in that context converts into full local elevation. The assessed vector CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H is internally consistent with that model: local attack vector and low privileges required mean the adversary must already be running code in a standard user context on the target, AC:H indicates a race or timing window that is not reliably repeatable, UI:N means no victim action is needed once the foothold exists, and S:U means the elevation stays inside the same host's security authority rather than crossing a component boundary. Affected builds span Windows 10 (1607 through 22H2), Windows 11 (23H2, 24H2, 25H2, 26H1, 26H2), and Windows Server 2012, 2012 R2, 2016, 2019, 2022 and 2025 including Server Core installations, per the EUVD version data, i.e. essentially the entire supported Windows servicing tree shares the same RPC runtime lineage. Note that the supplied tag 'Information Disclosure' does not match a CWE-763 elevation-of-privilege issue and should not be relied on; the vendor's own CWE and CVSS impact metrics govern. No CISA KEV entry, no EPSS-driven urgency signal, and no public proof-of-concept were provided, so the practical risk is low-to-moderate and dominated by asset exposure (how many unprivileged local users can touch a given host) rather than by exploitation momentum.
Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Local authenticated foothold required (AV:L, PR:L); CWE-763 pointer-release bug is timing-dependent giving AC:H; successful escalation yields full C:H/I:H/A:H with unchanged scope.
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Release of invalid pointer or reference in RPC Runtime allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Executive ViewAI
CVE-2026-83908 in the Windows RPC Runtime allows a low-privileged local user to escalate to SYSTEM on affected Windows hosts, concentrating risk on multi-user, RDP, and jump servers where untrusted accounts can log on locally. Although severity is HIGH and exploitation requires high complexity, no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no confirmed actively exploited (CISA KEV) status means leadership should treat this as a prioritized patch-management issue rather than an emergency. Organizations with shared Windows environments should care because a successful escalation would give an attacker full control of the host and any credentials or data accessible from it.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio
Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in
A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr
Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables
Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker
An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote
FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit
Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio
Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/
React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo
Command injection in the Windows Shell lets remote, unauthenticated attackers bypass a Windows security feature and then
External control of file name or path in Windows NTLM allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network
EUVD-2026-100045
GHSA-hpc7-h6cp-rfr6
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB