Skip to main content

Windows Immersive Server EUVDEUVD-2026-100042

| CVE-2026-85905 HIGH
Heap-based Buffer Overflow (CWE-122)
2026-10-13 secure@microsoft.com GHSA-m7h7-xq87-xcx3
8.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: microsoft
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain low-privileged local session
  2. Delivery
    Craft malicious input to UI Immersive Server
  3. Exploit
    Trigger heap buffer overflow (CWE-122)
  4. Execution
    Corrupt heap and hijack execution
  5. Impact
    Elevate to SYSTEM privileges

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Heap buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to already hold a local, authenticated low-privileged account on the target Windows system (CVSS PR:L, AV:L) - there is no remote or unauthenticated path. The attacker must be able to execute a process that reaches and sends crafted input to the Windows UI Immersive Server component to trigger the heap overflow; no end-user interaction is required (UI:N). Limiting factors: local access prerequisite and an existing authenticated foothold, which is why CISA SSVC rates it Automatable: no (not mass-exploitable). The affected product is any supported Windows edition below the fixed build (e.g., Windows 11 24H2 < 10.0.26100.9711, Windows Server 2025 < 10.0.26100.33650, down to Windows 10 1607 and Server 2012); patched builds are not exploitable.

Impact

Signals are largely consistent and point to a serious but not emergency-grade local privilege-escalation flaw. The CVSS 3.1 base score of 8.8 is driven by AV:L (local attack vector), AC:L (low complexity), PR:L (an already-authenticated low-privileged foothold is required), UI:N, and a changed scope (S:C) with total C:H/I:H/A:H impact - consistent with escalation to SYSTEM on a successful heap overflow of the Windows UI Immersive Server. CISA's SSVC framework reinforces this read: Technical Impact is 'total' (matching C:H/I:H/A:H), but Exploitation is 'none' (no observed or public exploitation) and Automatable is 'no' (local, authentication-gated, so it cannot be mass-scanned/wormed). There is no CISA KEV listing and no POC reported, so exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' No EPSS score was supplied in the input, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood could not be weighed; absence of EPSS is a data gap, not a low score. Net: this is a real priority for Windows fleets because the affected footprint is enormous and a patch exists, but the local + PR:L requirement means it is a post-compromise escalation primitive rather than a remotely wormable threat - prioritize for patching on privilege-boundary-sensitive hosts, but it is not a drop-everything internet-facing emergency. No signals conflict; the main caveat is the missing EPSS value.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who already has a low-privileged authenticated session on a Windows host (e.g., via phishing, a stolen standard-user credential, or a compromised service account) runs a crafted process that sends malformed input to the UI Immersive Server component, triggering the heap-based buffer overflow. Successful exploitation corrupts heap memory to execute attacker-controlled code at elevated (SYSTEM) privilege, breaking out of the original security context (scope change). No public exploit code or active exploitation has been identified at the time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 13, 2026

Local privilege escalation in the Windows UI Immersive Server component allows an attacker who already holds a low-privileged local account on a Windows host to corrupt heap memory via a crafted input and elevate to a higher-integrity context, including SYSTEM. Affected systems are all supported Windows client and server editions running builds below the fixed patch level, ranging from Windows 10 1607 and Windows Server 2012 up through Windows 11 26H2 and Windows Server 2025; patched builds are not exploitable, and there is no remote or unauthenticated path. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, CISA's SSVC rates exploitation as none and non-automatable, and no EPSS score was supplied, so the practical risk is a serious but post-compromise local escalation flaw rather than an emergency-grade, mass-exploitable issue; a vendor patch is available.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: install the Microsoft security update for CVE-2026-85905, which brings affected systems to the fixed builds listed in the MSRC advisory (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-85905) - for example Windows 11 24H2 to 10.0.26100.9711 or later, Windows 11 26H1 to 10.0.28000.3231 or later, Windows Server 2025 to 10.0.26100.33650 or later, Windows Server 2022 to 10.0.20348.5761 or later, Windows Server 2019 to 10.0.17763.9376 or later, Windows Server 2016 to 10.0.14393.9612 or later, and Server 2012/2012 R2 to 6.2.9200.26434 / 6.3.9600.23470 respectively; the same build thresholds apply to the corresponding Server Core installations. Because exploitation requires an existing authenticated low-privileged local account and no network vector exists, the only meaningful compensating controls are attack-surface reduction and containment until patching completes: restrict interactive local logon rights and RDP access to trusted administrators, remove or disable unnecessary local and service accounts, and monitor for suspicious process spawning or token/integrity-level elevation attempts on interactive sessions - accepting the trade-off that tighter logon restrictions reduce administrative flexibility and can disrupt shared-workstation or jump-host workflows, and that these controls do not remove the underlying heap overflow if an attacker already has local code execution. Disabling or removing the Windows UI Immersive Server component is not a supported or practical mitigation because it is tightly coupled to the shell, so no reliable feature-level workaround exists; prioritization should reflect that patched builds are not exploitable and that CISA SSVC rates this as non-automatable with no known exploitation.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 20 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability is a heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122) in Windows UI Immersive Server, a user-mode Windows component associated with immersive shell/UI surfaces. The root-cause class is improper bounds validation on a heap-allocated buffer: crafted input delivered to the component causes a write beyond the allocated region, corrupting adjacent heap metadata and objects, which under the assessed conditions yields code execution within the vulnerable process context. The CVSS vector CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H indicates the flaw is only reachable locally (AV:L), with low attack complexity, requiring an existing low-privileged authenticated account (PR:L) and no user interaction (UI:N); scope is changed (S:C), meaning the impact crosses a security boundary, which is consistent with a privilege-escalation outcome rather than simple denial of service. CWE-122 rather than CWE-121 (stack overflow) confirms the buffer is dynamically allocated, so the exploitation primitive is heap grooming and object/metadata corruption rather than straightforward stack return-address overwrite. No CPE strings were included in the supplied data; product identification therefore relies on the Microsoft MSRC advisory reference and the ENISA EUVD affected-version list, which spans Windows 10 (1607, 1809, 21H2, 22H2), Windows 11 (23H2, 24H2, 25H2, 26H1, 26H2), and Windows Server 2012, 2012 R2, 2016, 2019, 2022 and 2025, including Server Core installations.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 8.8 HIGH
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 8.8 HIGH

Local privilege escalation needing an existing low-privileged account gives AV:L/PR:L; low-complexity heap overflow yields AC:L; escalation crosses a privilege boundary (S:C) with full C:H/I:H/A:H.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:21 cve.org
HIGH 8.8

DescriptionCVE.org

Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows UI Immersive Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A high-severity local privilege-escalation flaw in the Windows UI Immersive Server component affects every supported Windows client and server edition, from Windows 10 1607 and Windows Server 2012 through Windows 11 26H2 and Windows Server 2025. Because exploitation requires an attacker to already hold a low-privileged account on a host, this vulnerability does not create a new entry point but does let an existing intruder escalate to SYSTEM, effectively erasing the containment boundary that limits how far a single compromised endpoint or server can be abused. Leadership should treat this as a broad estate-wide patch-discipline obligation rather than a crisis, since no public exploit has been identified at the time of analysis and a vendor fix is already available.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 77% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Core Windows component across all supported client and server editions
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

44
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +44
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

A heap overflow occurs when a program writes data beyond the bounds of a buffer allocated in the heap memory region.

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2025-13315 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-13316 HIGH POC
8.2 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy