Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessReach GDI over network
-
ExploitSend crafted input
-
ExecutionTrigger stack buffer overflow
-
ImpactCrash service, deny availability
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Stack buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | No special configuration is named in the description - the flaw is in the Windows GDI (graphics device interface) subsystem, which is present by default across all supported Windows client and server editions, including Server Core installations. Per CVSS AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N, exploitation requires only network reach to a component that processes the attacker-supplied GDI data, with no authentication and no user interaction. The principal limiting factor is impact scope: the outcome is denial of service (A:H, C:N/I:N) - a crash or unavailability - not code execution or data disclosure. Realistic exposure also depends on whether the vulnerable GDI code path is reachable from the network in a given deployment (e.g., a network-facing service that parses the relevant graphics/font data), which the advisory does not specify. |
| Impact | Signals are mostly aligned toward a moderate, availability-only concern rather than a top-tier emergency. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) describes a network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated vulnerability, but the impact is strictly A:H with C:N/I:N - this is a denial-of-service, not code execution or data exposure, so the 7.5 Base score is driven entirely by availability loss. CISA's SSVC framework corroborates this: Exploitation is 'none' (no observed or public exploitation), Technical Impact is 'partial' (consistent with DoS rather than full compromise), while Automatable is 'yes', meaning the crash could be triggered reliably and at scale if an exploit emerged. There is no CISA KEV listing and no POC indicator in the provided data, so this is not a confirmed in-the-wild threat. No EPSS score was provided, so exploitation-probability cannot be quantified here. Net assessment: a legitimate patch-worthy issue because of broad Windows exposure and unauthenticated network reach, but currently lower real-world urgency than a CVSS 7.5 might suggest, since the worst-case outcome is a service/system crash rather than compromise and no exploitation is observed. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A remote, unauthenticated attacker sends specially crafted data that reaches the Windows GDI component and overflows a stack-based buffer, causing the affected process or system to crash and become unavailable. Because CVSS is AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N, no credentials or user interaction are required and the attack is low-complexity. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, and SSVC lists exploitation as 'none'. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026
Denial of service in the Windows Graphics Device Interface (GDI) subsystem allows unauthenticated, remote attackers to trigger a stack-based buffer overflow (CWE-121) and crash affected components, requiring no user interaction. The flaw (CVSS:3.1 7.5, AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H) affects all supported Windows client and server editions, including Server Core installations, but impact is confined to availability - there is no confidentiality or integrity loss, code execution, or privilege escalation described. CISA's SSVC assessment records exploitation as "none" and notes the flaw is automatable; no public exploit code was identified at time of analysis, and a vendor patch is available per the Microsoft advisory.
RemediationAI
Patch available per vendor advisory: apply the Microsoft update for CVE-2026-83860 via the MSRC update guide (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-83860), which raises affected builds to at least the following thresholds - Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.26434, Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.23470, Windows Server 2016 and Windows 10 1607 10.0.14393.9612, Windows Server 2019 and Windows 10 1809 10.0.17763.9376, Windows 10 21H2/22H2 10.0.19044.7807, Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.5761, Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.33650, Windows 11 23H2 10.0.22631.7652, Windows 11 24H2 10.0.26100.9711, Windows 11 25H2 10.0.26200.9711, Windows 11 26H2 10.0.26300.9711, and Windows 11 26H1 10.0.28000.3231. Because no patch-free configuration change fully removes the vulnerable GDI code path (GDI is a default Windows component and Server Core still exposes it), compensating controls are limited to reducing reachability: restrict or block network access to services on the affected hosts that parse externally supplied graphics, image, or font data, and segment those hosts from untrusted networks - the trade-off is loss of functionality for any legitimate remote graphics/font-processing workflow, and this is only a partial mitigation since the advisory does not identify which network-facing component is reachable. Additional hardening with minimal functional cost includes enabling Windows Firewall default-deny inbound rules on Server Core and server roles, monitoring for repeated unexpected termination of GDI-dependent processes as a crash-oracle indicator, and prioritizing remediation on internet-facing or multi-tenant hosts where the availability impact (A:H) is most consequential; the SSVC "automatable: yes" rating means attackers can attempt the trigger at scale, so internet-exposed systems should be patched on an expedited schedule even though exploitation has not been observed.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 20 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause is CWE-121 (stack-based buffer overflow): input taken from network-reachable processing is written into a fixed-length stack buffer without adequate bounds validation, corrupting the stack and terminating the process. GDI is a core Windows subsystem that handles 2D graphics, font rendering, and device-context operations, and it ships enabled by default across supported client and server builds - including the Server Core installation option, which lacks a full desktop but still includes GDI. Because the CVSS vector is AV:N with PR:N and UI:N, the vulnerable code path is assumed to be reachable over the network by an unauthenticated sender with no victim interaction; in practice, that means a network-facing component that parses attacker-supplied graphics, image, or font data (the advisory does not name the specific reachable service). The assessed scope is unchanged (S:U) and the sole impact is A:H, i.e., crash/unavailability rather than memory-corruption-driven code execution. The CPE data was not supplied; affected instance identification therefore rests on the EUVD build-number ranges listed in the vendor advisory.
Know when the next one hits your stack
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated with no user interaction per vendor vector; impact is availability-only denial of service, so C:N/I:N/A:H.
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Stack-based buffer overflow in Windows GDI allows an unauthorized attacker to deny service over a network.
Executive ViewAI
An unauthenticated, remotely triggerable denial-of-service flaw in the Microsoft Windows graphics (GDI) subsystem can crash unpatched Windows clients and servers - including Server Core builds - with no user interaction, giving any network-reachable attacker a low-skill way to knock business services offline. Impact is confined to availability: no data theft, tampering, or code execution is described, so the exposure is service interruption and user productivity loss rather than a breach of confidentiality. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and a patch is available, so leadership should treat this as a time-bound patching obligation across the entire Windows estate rather than a crisis requiring emergency containment.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.
A stack-based buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a buffer located on the stack than it was allocated to hold.
EUVD-2026-100018
GHSA-2pxw-73v4-635j
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB