Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessGain local privileged OS access
-
DeliverySupply crafted data to vulnerable BIOS routine
-
ExploitTrigger integer overflow and buffer overflow
-
ExecutionCorrupt memory to execute arbitrary firmware code
-
ImpactPersist below OS / compromise CIA
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Integer overflow checks
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires local access to the system and already-held high privileges (PR:H) - i.e., an administrator/root-level foothold capable of invoking the vulnerable AMI Aptio V BIOS routine that mishandles integer arithmetic (CWE-190). High attack complexity (AC:H) further limits exploitation: the attacker must satisfy conditions outside their direct control (e.g., specific timing, memory layout, or firmware state) to turn the integer overflow into a controllable buffer overflow. No user interaction is needed (UI:N). The description does not name a specific toggled feature or non-default configuration; the practical limiting factors are the local-only vector, the pre-existing privilege requirement, and the high complexity, which together make opportunistic or remote mass exploitation infeasible. |
| Impact | This is a moderate-priority, high-barrier firmware flaw rather than a widespread emergency. The vendor CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N, VC:H/VI:H/VA:H) scores 7.1 and is internally consistent with the description's claim of local-access integer overflow leading to code execution: exploitation requires local access (AV:L), already-elevated privileges (PR:H), and overcomes conditions the attacker does not control (AC:H). These three factors together sharply reduce real-world risk despite the full CIA impact. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC were provided, so there is no signal of active or probable exploitation - consistent with a bug that demands local high-privilege access. The SSVC-style read is: exploitation=none observed, automatable=no (local, high-complexity, privilege-gated), technical impact=total. The main caveat is BIOS/firmware context: successful exploitation yields code execution below the OS (potential for persistent, stealthy implants surviving OS reinstalls), which raises the strategic impact even though the access prerequisites keep the probability low. The scope/subsequent-system metrics are marked Low (SC:L/SI:L/SA:L), implying limited cross-boundary impact. Net: a genuine defect worth patching on BIOS-update cycles, but not a drop-everything issue absent any exploitation evidence. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who has already achieved local privileged (administrator/root) access to a system running AMI Aptio V (APTIOV) BIOS supplies crafted input to a vulnerable BIOS routine, triggering an integer overflow (CWE-190). The overflow leads to a buffer overflow and memory corruption that the attacker leverages to execute arbitrary code in the firmware context, potentially installing persistent, below-the-OS malware. High attack complexity (AC:H) means the attacker must satisfy conditions outside their control, and no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 13, 2026
Integer overflow in AMI AptioV BIOS firmware, classified as CWE-190, can be triggered by a local high-privileged caller to cause buffer overflows, memory corruption, and potential arbitrary code execution with high impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Exploitation requires local access, an existing administrator/root-level foothold (PR:H), and high attack complexity (AC:H) per the assessed vector AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, so it is not remotely reachable or mass-exploitable. No public exploit was identified at time of analysis, and active exploitation is not confirmed by KEV data; this is a moderate-priority, high-barrier firmware flaw rather than a widespread emergency.
RemediationAI
Patch available per vendor advisory AMI-SA-2026002 at https://go.ami.com/hubfs/Security%20Advisories/2026/AMI-SA-2026002.pdf; no exact fixed firmware version is provided in the supplied data, so the primary action is to obtain and apply the OEM-specific corrected BIOS/UEFI image rather than a generic AMI release. Until an update can be deployed, reduce exposure by tightly restricting local administrator/root access to trusted personnel, since exploitation requires local access and high privileges (PR:H), with the trade-off that it limits legitimate administrative workflows. Additional compensating controls include enforcing physical security and disabling or restricting BIOS/firmware update interfaces and OS-level firmware flashing utilities where feasible, though this can complicate legitimate maintenance and must be re-enabled for approved updates; monitor firmware integrity through TPM/measured-boot attestation or equivalent controls where available, recognizing that firmware-level detection is limited and may not catch a sophisticated local attacker.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
AMI AptioV is a UEFI/BIOS firmware platform used across many OEM systems, and CVE-2025-58771 is rooted in CWE-190 (Integer Overflow or Wraparound) within a BIOS routine. A local actor able to invoke the affected routine with high privileges can drive an arithmetic overflow that wraps a size or index value, which the description links to buffer overflows, memory corruption, and possible arbitrary code execution. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:ami:aptiov:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* indicates all AptioV versions are treated as affected in the supplied data. The provided CVSS 4.0 vector AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L scores 7.1, and the independent assessment aligns at CVSS 3.1 AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H: local-only, high privileges, high complexity, no user interaction, and no scope change. The high complexity reflects firmware state, timing, or memory-layout preconditions outside the attacker's direct control that must be satisfied to turn the integer overflow into a controllable memory-corruption primitive.
Know when Aptiov gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L
Local-only firmware bug requiring pre-existing high privileges (PR:H) and conditions outside attacker control (AC:H); code execution yields full confidentiality, integrity, and availability loss.
Primary rating from Vendor (AMI).
CVSS VectorVendor: AMI
DescriptionCVE.org
AMI APTIOV contains vulnerabilities in BIOS where users may cause “Integer Overflow or Wraparound” by local access. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could lead to buffer overflows, memory corruption, and arbitrary code execution, and also impact Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability.
Executive ViewAI
A high-severity integer overflow vulnerability in AMI AptioV BIOS firmware could allow an attacker with existing administrative privileges to execute arbitrary code and compromise system confidentiality, integrity, and availability. While exploitation requires local access and high complexity, a successful attack could lead to persistent firmware-level compromise, affecting organizations using affected hardware. Leadership should prioritize assessing exposure and planning mitigations, as firmware vulnerabilities are difficult to remediate and can bypass traditional security controls.
No vendor patch is currently available. Interim mitigations include enforcing least privilege to limit administrative access, enabling Secure Boot and firmware integrity monitoring, restricting physical access to systems, and conducting regular firmware integrity checks; apply vendor-provided mitigations or patches as soon as they are released.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.
Integer overflow occurs when an arithmetic operation produces a result that exceeds the maximum value a given integer type can store.
Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.
Arbitrary code execution in AMI APTIOV BIOS firmware is achievable by a locally-present privileged user exploiting an in
Local attackers with low-level privileges can cause buffer overflows and memory corruption in AMI AptioV UEFI firmware b
A classic buffer overflow (CWE-120) in AMI Aptio V UEFI/BIOS firmware allows a local user holding low-level privileges t
An out-of-bounds write (CWE-787) in AMI Aptio V (APTIOV) BIOS firmware can be triggered by a local attacker who already
Local information disclosure in AMI Aptio V BIOS/UEFI firmware allows low-privileged local attackers to access sensitive
EUVD-2025-211075
GHSA-fw3j-xvmr-h427
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB