Skip to main content

Remote Desktop Client CVE-2026-97789

| EUVDEUVD-2026-99835 HIGH
Use After Free (CWE-416)
2026-10-13 secure@microsoft.com GHSA-vwc3-c4q3-5mvm
7.5
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: microsoft
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Lure victim toward malicious RDP server
  2. Delivery
    Victim initiates Remote Desktop connection
  3. Exploit
    Server triggers use-after-free in client
  4. Execution
    Execute arbitrary code as user
  5. Impact
    Compromise client host

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Memory lifecycle management
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the victim to actively initiate a Remote Desktop Client (mstsc) connection to an attacker-controlled or compromised RDP server - the malicious server side drives the use-after-free, so this is not a passive drive-by. CVSS UI:R confirms mandatory user interaction (the user must launch/accept the connection), and AC:H indicates additional non-trivial conditions beyond a single request, consistent with needing to win a memory-state race or perform heap grooming for reliable code execution. PR:N means no authentication to the target is needed, but the social-engineering step, the reliability hurdle (AC:H), and the fact that the client is not a passively network-reachable listener are the primary limiting factors; SSVC Automatable=no indicates it is not amenable to reliable mass/wormable automation.

Impact

This is a genuinely moderate-priority issue rather than a top-tier emergency, and the signals are largely consistent. The CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.5 (HIGH) reflects network vector (AV:N) with total impact (C:H/I:H/A:H), but two metrics meaningfully constrain real-world risk: high attack complexity (AC:H) and required user interaction (UI:R). Because this is the Remote Desktop CLIENT, AV:N does not mean a server listening on the network can be attacked directly - the victim must be induced to connect to an attacker-controlled RDP endpoint. CISA's SSVC framework aligns with a measured posture: Exploitation=none (no observed exploitation), Automatable=no (consistent with UI:R and AC:H, so not wormable), though Technical Impact=total (consistent with code execution and C/I/A all High). There is no CISA KEV listing, no public exploit code identified in the input, and no EPSS score was provided, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified from the data. PR:N confirms the attacker needs no authentication, but this is offset by the social-engineering requirement. Net: a patched, non-automatable, user-interaction-dependent client-side RCE - important to remediate given total technical impact and ubiquitous footprint, but not an actively-exploited drop-everything item on current evidence.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker stands up a malicious or compromised RDP server and, via phishing or a crafted .rdp file/link, lures a user into initiating a Remote Desktop connection to it. Malicious server responses trigger the use-after-free (CWE-416) in the Remote Desktop Client, allowing the attacker to execute arbitrary code in the context of the connecting user. No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis, and the high attack complexity implies the attacker must win a memory-state condition (e.g., heap grooming) for reliable execution.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.6% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 13, 2026

Use-after-free in Microsoft's Remote Desktop Client (mstsc) allows an attacker who controls an RDP server to execute arbitrary code on the machine of any user who connects to it, with high confidentiality, integrity and availability impact (CVSS 7.5; AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R). Exploitation is not a passive drive-by: the victim must launch the client and initiate or accept the RDP connection to the attacker-controlled or compromised server, and the High attack complexity reflects the heap grooming or race conditions needed for reliable code execution. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, and CISA's SSVC assessment records Exploitation=none and Automatable=no, so wormable or mass automation is not expected; the realistic risk is confined to environments whose users connect to untrusted or externally controlled RDP endpoints.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patches are available from Microsoft - install the current cumulative update for each affected Windows build so that the Remote Desktop Client binaries reach the fixed thresholds identified in the advisory and EUVD data (for example 10.0.22631.7652 or later for Windows 11 23H2, 10.0.26100.33650 or later for Windows Server 2025, 10.0.17763.9376 or later for Windows 10 1809 and Windows Server 2019, 10.0.19044.7807 or later for Windows 10 21H2/22H2, 10.0.14393.9612 or later for Windows Server 2016, 10.0.20348.5761 or later for Windows Server 2022, and 6.2.9200.26434 / 6.3.9600.23470 or later for Windows Server 2012 and 2012 R2), using the guidance at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-97789; because these arrive as cumulative updates, a reboot is normally required and legacy platforms such as Server 2012 and 2012 R2 may need the applicable extended-support update path. Until updates are fully deployed, the practical compensating control is to stop users from opening mstsc sessions against untrusted endpoints: block or tightly allow-list outbound RDP (TCP/UDP 3389) at the perimeter and host firewall so connections can only reach known, corporate-managed RDP servers, and remove or restrict the Remote Desktop client on hosts that do not require it - the trade-off being that this breaks legitimate remote administration and require staff to use an approved jump host or published-app path instead. Where outbound RDP cannot be restricted, reduce exposure by requiring RDP connections only through a brokered gateway or RD Gateway with server certificate validation, and monitor mstsc process crashes on endpoints as a possible indicator of exploitation attempts, accepting that this is detection rather than prevention and does not mitigate a successful heap-grooming attack.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 20 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The root cause is a use-after-free (CWE-416) in the Remote Desktop Client, which parses a substantial amount of attacker-influenced data supplied by the RDP server (capability negotiation, channel data, graphics and clipboard-style virtual channels). The client frees an internal object but later dereferences it, yielding memory corruption that the server-side attacker can steer toward controlled code execution - the accompanying tags (Use After Free, Memory Corruption, Denial Of Service) reflect that corruption may also simply crash the client. Because the flaw lives in the client, the attack direction is inverted from the usual RDP exposure model: the target does not run a listening service, and the malicious party is the peer the user chooses to connect to, which is why the CVSS vector carries UI:R (mandatory user interaction) and AC:H (non-trivial grooming/race conditions) while PR:N confirms no authentication is required on the victim side. Affected code is shipped in the Windows Remote Desktop Client binaries across the Windows 10, Windows 11 and Windows Server 2012 through 2025 codebases listed by EUVD, meaning the same defect is present in both workstation and server SKUs that include the client, including Server Core installations.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.5 HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.5 HIGH

Client-side RCE where a victim must connect to a malicious RDP server (UI:R), winning a memory condition (AC:H); no authentication (PR:N), same-context total impact (C/I/A:H, S:U).

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:22 cve.org
HIGH 7.5

DescriptionCVE.org

Use after free in Remote Desktop Client allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A memory-safety flaw in Microsoft's Remote Desktop Client (mstsc), the client shipped on Windows workstations, allows whoever controls the RDP server to run arbitrary code on the connecting user's machine. The exposure is limited to staff who initiate RDP sessions to endpoints outside the organization's control, since the user must launch the client and connect to a malicious or compromised server for the flaw to be reached; no public exploit or active exploitation is known, and the required heap manipulation makes reliable attacks difficult. Leadership should care because a successful attack yields full control of an employee endpoint, a foothold from which corporate data and internal systems could be reached.

Business Impact: Medium
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.6%
Top 54% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Remote Desktop Client ships built-in with all supported Windows versions
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.6%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
Medium
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

39
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +38
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Use-after-free vulnerabilities occur when a program continues to access memory through a pointer after that memory has been deallocated.

Memory corruption occurs when a program writes data beyond the boundaries of allocated memory regions or accesses memory in unintended ways, violating the integrity of the process's address space.

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2025-13315 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-13316 HIGH POC
8.2 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy