Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessLure victim toward malicious RDP server
-
DeliveryVictim initiates Remote Desktop connection
-
ExploitServer triggers use-after-free in client
-
ExecutionExecute arbitrary code as user
-
ImpactCompromise client host
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Memory lifecycle management
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the victim to actively initiate a Remote Desktop Client (mstsc) connection to an attacker-controlled or compromised RDP server - the malicious server side drives the use-after-free, so this is not a passive drive-by. CVSS UI:R confirms mandatory user interaction (the user must launch/accept the connection), and AC:H indicates additional non-trivial conditions beyond a single request, consistent with needing to win a memory-state race or perform heap grooming for reliable code execution. PR:N means no authentication to the target is needed, but the social-engineering step, the reliability hurdle (AC:H), and the fact that the client is not a passively network-reachable listener are the primary limiting factors; SSVC Automatable=no indicates it is not amenable to reliable mass/wormable automation. |
| Impact | This is a genuinely moderate-priority issue rather than a top-tier emergency, and the signals are largely consistent. The CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.5 (HIGH) reflects network vector (AV:N) with total impact (C:H/I:H/A:H), but two metrics meaningfully constrain real-world risk: high attack complexity (AC:H) and required user interaction (UI:R). Because this is the Remote Desktop CLIENT, AV:N does not mean a server listening on the network can be attacked directly - the victim must be induced to connect to an attacker-controlled RDP endpoint. CISA's SSVC framework aligns with a measured posture: Exploitation=none (no observed exploitation), Automatable=no (consistent with UI:R and AC:H, so not wormable), though Technical Impact=total (consistent with code execution and C/I/A all High). There is no CISA KEV listing, no public exploit code identified in the input, and no EPSS score was provided, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified from the data. PR:N confirms the attacker needs no authentication, but this is offset by the social-engineering requirement. Net: a patched, non-automatable, user-interaction-dependent client-side RCE - important to remediate given total technical impact and ubiquitous footprint, but not an actively-exploited drop-everything item on current evidence. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker stands up a malicious or compromised RDP server and, via phishing or a crafted .rdp file/link, lures a user into initiating a Remote Desktop connection to it. Malicious server responses trigger the use-after-free (CWE-416) in the Remote Desktop Client, allowing the attacker to execute arbitrary code in the context of the connecting user. No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis, and the high attack complexity implies the attacker must win a memory-state condition (e.g., heap grooming) for reliable execution. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 13, 2026
Use-after-free in Microsoft's Remote Desktop Client (mstsc) allows an attacker who controls an RDP server to execute arbitrary code on the machine of any user who connects to it, with high confidentiality, integrity and availability impact (CVSS 7.5; AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R). Exploitation is not a passive drive-by: the victim must launch the client and initiate or accept the RDP connection to the attacker-controlled or compromised server, and the High attack complexity reflects the heap grooming or race conditions needed for reliable code execution. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, and CISA's SSVC assessment records Exploitation=none and Automatable=no, so wormable or mass automation is not expected; the realistic risk is confined to environments whose users connect to untrusted or externally controlled RDP endpoints.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patches are available from Microsoft - install the current cumulative update for each affected Windows build so that the Remote Desktop Client binaries reach the fixed thresholds identified in the advisory and EUVD data (for example 10.0.22631.7652 or later for Windows 11 23H2, 10.0.26100.33650 or later for Windows Server 2025, 10.0.17763.9376 or later for Windows 10 1809 and Windows Server 2019, 10.0.19044.7807 or later for Windows 10 21H2/22H2, 10.0.14393.9612 or later for Windows Server 2016, 10.0.20348.5761 or later for Windows Server 2022, and 6.2.9200.26434 / 6.3.9600.23470 or later for Windows Server 2012 and 2012 R2), using the guidance at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-97789; because these arrive as cumulative updates, a reboot is normally required and legacy platforms such as Server 2012 and 2012 R2 may need the applicable extended-support update path. Until updates are fully deployed, the practical compensating control is to stop users from opening mstsc sessions against untrusted endpoints: block or tightly allow-list outbound RDP (TCP/UDP 3389) at the perimeter and host firewall so connections can only reach known, corporate-managed RDP servers, and remove or restrict the Remote Desktop client on hosts that do not require it - the trade-off being that this breaks legitimate remote administration and require staff to use an approved jump host or published-app path instead. Where outbound RDP cannot be restricted, reduce exposure by requiring RDP connections only through a brokered gateway or RD Gateway with server certificate validation, and monitor mstsc process crashes on endpoints as a possible indicator of exploitation attempts, accepting that this is detection rather than prevention and does not mitigate a successful heap-grooming attack.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 20 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause is a use-after-free (CWE-416) in the Remote Desktop Client, which parses a substantial amount of attacker-influenced data supplied by the RDP server (capability negotiation, channel data, graphics and clipboard-style virtual channels). The client frees an internal object but later dereferences it, yielding memory corruption that the server-side attacker can steer toward controlled code execution - the accompanying tags (Use After Free, Memory Corruption, Denial Of Service) reflect that corruption may also simply crash the client. Because the flaw lives in the client, the attack direction is inverted from the usual RDP exposure model: the target does not run a listening service, and the malicious party is the peer the user chooses to connect to, which is why the CVSS vector carries UI:R (mandatory user interaction) and AC:H (non-trivial grooming/race conditions) while PR:N confirms no authentication is required on the victim side. Affected code is shipped in the Windows Remote Desktop Client binaries across the Windows 10, Windows 11 and Windows Server 2012 through 2025 codebases listed by EUVD, meaning the same defect is present in both workstation and server SKUs that include the client, including Server Core installations.
Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Client-side RCE where a victim must connect to a malicious RDP server (UI:R), winning a memory condition (AC:H); no authentication (PR:N), same-context total impact (C/I/A:H, S:U).
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Use after free in Remote Desktop Client allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Executive ViewAI
A memory-safety flaw in Microsoft's Remote Desktop Client (mstsc), the client shipped on Windows workstations, allows whoever controls the RDP server to run arbitrary code on the connecting user's machine. The exposure is limited to staff who initiate RDP sessions to endpoints outside the organization's control, since the user must launch the client and connect to a malicious or compromised server for the flaw to be reached; no public exploit or active exploitation is known, and the required heap manipulation makes reliable attacks difficult. Leadership should care because a successful attack yields full control of an employee endpoint, a foothold from which corporate data and internal systems could be reached.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Use-after-free vulnerabilities occur when a program continues to access memory through a pointer after that memory has been deallocated.
Memory corruption occurs when a program writes data beyond the boundaries of allocated memory regions or accesses memory in unintended ways, violating the integrity of the process's address space.
Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio
Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in
A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr
Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables
Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker
Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b
An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote
FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit
Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio
Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred
Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/
React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo
EUVD-2026-99835
GHSA-vwc3-c4q3-5mvm
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB