Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate as low-privileged local user
  2. Delivery
    Interact with Windows Installer service
  3. Exploit
    Trigger use-after-free via race window
  4. Execution
    Reclaim freed object with crafted data
  5. Impact
    Execute code as SYSTEM

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Memory lifecycle management
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires LOCAL access with an existing low-privileged authenticated account (PR:L, AV:L) on a host running the Windows Installer (msiexec) service, which is present by default on all supported Windows client and server editions - no special feature flag or non-default configuration is called out in the advisory. Exploitation hinges on triggering and winning a use-after-free race condition (reflected in AC:H), so success is timing-dependent and not guaranteed on a single attempt. Limiting factors: no remote vector (local only), the attacker must already be authenticated on the system, no user interaction of a victim is required (UI:N) but a prior foothold is, and high attack complexity reduces reliability. Server Core installations are also affected per the EUVD version list.

Impact

Signals are consistent and point to a moderate, non-urgent priority. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 7.0 (High) with vector AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N - local vector, high attack complexity, and low privileges already required - which caps real-world urgency despite the 'total' technical impact (C:H/I:H/A:H). CISA SSVC reinforces this: Exploitation=none and Automatable=no, meaning no observed exploitation and no reliable mass-automation path (consistent with a race-condition use-after-free that is fingerprintable but not trivially weaponizable). The vulnerability is NOT in CISA KEV and no public exploit code was identified in the provided data, so exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' The AC:H metric aligns with a CWE-416 use-after-free that likely depends on winning a timing/race window, which also explains Automatable=no. Net: this is a legitimate local elevation-of-privilege flaw worth patching in normal cycles, but not an emergency - the combination of required local authenticated access, high complexity, no automation, and no known exploitation keeps real-world risk well below what the 7.0 'High' label alone might suggest. The one minor conflict is the 'Denial Of Service' input tag versus a description that states only privilege elevation; the A:H impact partially supports an availability effect, but the primary consequence is EoP, not DoS.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A local, low-privileged attacker who has already gained a foothold on a Windows host (e.g., a standard user account or a constrained service account) interacts with the Windows Installer service to trigger a use-after-free, winning a race condition to reclaim the freed object with attacker-controlled data. Successful exploitation yields code execution at SYSTEM, giving full control of the machine. No public exploit code was identified in the provided data, and the high attack complexity (AC:H) makes reliable exploitation non-trivial.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 13, 2026

Local privilege escalation in Microsoft Windows Installer (msiexec) allows an authenticated low-privileged user to trigger a use-after-free (CWE-416) in the installer component and elevate to higher-integrity code execution on the same host. The flaw carries CVSS 3.1 base score 7.0 (AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), meaning it is local-only, requires an existing low-privileged account, needs no victim interaction, and is timing-dependent because the race must be won (AC:H). It affects a very broad footprint of supported Windows client and server editions, including Server Core installations, but no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis and CISA's SSVC assessment records Exploitation: none with Automatable: no; signals are consistent and point to a moderate, non-urgent priority, with vendor-released fixes already available.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: Microsoft has published fixes through the MSRC update guide (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-96302) that raise affected systems to the patched build thresholds for their platform - for example Windows 11 24H2 to 10.0.26100.9711, Windows 11 25H2 to 10.0.26200.9711, Windows 11 23H2 to 10.0.22631.7652, Windows 10 21H2/22H2 to 10.0.19044.7807 and 10.0.19045.7807, Windows Server 2025 to 10.0.26100.33650, Windows Server 2022 to 10.0.20348.5761, Windows Server 2019 and Windows 10 1809 to 10.0.17763.9376, Windows Server 2016 and Windows 10 1607 to 10.0.14393.9612, and Server 2012/2012 R2 to 6.2.9200.26434 and 6.3.9600.23470, including the corresponding Server Core builds. Prioritize patching per normal monthly cumulative-update cadence rather than emergency response, since exploitation is assessed as none, no public exploit code exists, and the issue is not automatable; nevertheless, hosts where standard users are granted interactive logons and can invoke msiexec are the relevant exposure set. Where immediate patching is not possible, the practical compensating controls all target the local privilege boundary rather than the network: enforce application control (WDAC/AppLocker) so that only trusted, signed installer packages can be executed and so standard users cannot launch arbitrary msiexec operations - the trade-off is that unsigned or in-house MSI packages will begin failing and require explicit allowlisting; remove unnecessary local administrative rights and use Just Enough Administration / restricted tokens so a standard account is not an attractive pivot, at the cost of additional helpdesk overhead; and monitor Windows Installer operational and Application event logs (msiexec event sources, 1033/1040 install events, plus crash/handle-corruption telemetry) for anomalous installer activity, accepting that such monitoring is detective only and will not stop a well-timed race. Because the defect is a use-after-free in a core component, there is no configuration setting or port-level block that removes the exposure while leaving Windows Installer fully functional; the patch is the only complete fix.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 20 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability sits in the Windows Installer service (msiexec), the default-by-design component that processes .msi/.msp packages and performs installation, repair, and rollback operations, typically executing with high privilege on the local system. The root cause class is CWE-416, Use After Free: a heap-allocated object is released and then dereferenced or re-used, corrupting memory within the installer process. This is consistent with the supplied tags for Use After Free, Memory Corruption, and Denial Of Service - the same defect can both crash (the DoS tag) and, with careful heap grooming and timing, be steered toward controlled memory reuse for privilege escalation. The high attack-complexity rating in the assessed vector reflects the race-condition nature of reliably hitting the freed object, and the AC:L absence is the main reason this is not treated as an automatable enterprise-wide risk. Because the vector is AV:L with PR:L and UI:N, an attacker must already hold a foothold on the machine (for example a standard user session or a low-integrity process) and then invoke the installer locally; there is no remote, network-facing path described. CPE scope derived from the EUVD version list covers Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server 2012 through Windows Server 2025 kernels running the affected msiexec builds.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.0 HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.0 HIGH

Local use-after-free EoP: AV:L and PR:L because a logged-on low-priv account is needed, AC:H for the race condition, and full SYSTEM compromise gives C:H/I:H/A:H.

3.1 AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:21 cve.org
HIGH 7.0

DescriptionCVE.org

Use after free in Windows Installer allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Microsoft Windows Installer (msiexec) contains a local privilege escalation vulnerability (CVE-2026-96302) that could allow an authenticated low-privileged user to execute code at higher integrity on the same host. Because it affects a broad set of supported Windows client and server editions, including Server Core, unpatched systems could enable insider privilege escalation or lateral movement. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, and vendor-released fixes are available.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 85% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Windows Installer ships in every supported Windows client and server edition
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

35
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +35
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Use-after-free vulnerabilities occur when a program continues to access memory through a pointer after that memory has been deallocated.

Memory corruption occurs when a program writes data beyond the boundaries of allocated memory regions or accesses memory in unintended ways, violating the integrity of the process's address space.

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2025-13315 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-13316 HIGH POC
8.2 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy