Skip to main content

Fabric Composer CVE-2026-95764

| EUVDEUVD-2026-116181 MEDIUM
2026-11-03 security-alert@hpe.com
5.7
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: hpe
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain adjacent-network position
  2. Delivery
    Intercept client-to-API TLS session
  3. Exploit
    Present forged/substituted certificate
  4. Execution
    Client accepts due to improper validation
  5. Impact
    Capture disclosed sensitive information

Vulnerability Assessment

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to be on the same adjacent/logically-adjacent network (AV:A) as a client communicating with the HPE Networking Fabric Composer API, and depends on the API's improper certificate validation permitting a forged or attacker-substituted certificate to be accepted. A legitimate client interaction is required to complete the attack (UI:R), so it is not a silent, fully automated remote compromise. Limiting factors that reduce realistic risk: no Internet-facing/remote vector, dependence on a man-in-the-middle position within the management network, required user/client interaction, and impact limited to disclosure of sensitive information (no integrity or availability impact). No special product feature toggle is named in the available sources beyond the API's certificate handling.

Impact

This is a moderate-severity information-disclosure issue (CVSS 5.7) whose real-world priority is tempered by several limiting signals that align rather than conflict. The CVSS vector is self-consistent with the description: AV:A means the attacker must be adjacent (same logical L2/management network segment), not remote across the Internet; PR:N confirms no authentication is needed; UI:R means a legitimate user/client interaction is required to complete the attack; and impact is confined to confidentiality (C:H/I:N/A:N), matching 'access sensitive information.' There is no CISA KEV listing, no public PoC referenced, and no EPSS score supplied, so there is no evidence of active or imminent mass exploitation. The vuln.today decision label is 'this_month' (a routine remediation cadence, not act_now/emergency), consistent with the absence of exploitation signals. The practical blockers - adjacent-network positioning plus required user interaction (characteristic of a certificate-validation/MITM flaw) - mean this is a targeted, conditions-dependent risk rather than a broadly automatable one. Missing data to note explicitly: no EPSS probability, no KEV/PoC status, and CWE is listed as N/A though the description clearly describes improper certificate validation.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with a foothold on the same adjacent network as a Fabric Composer management client intercepts TLS traffic to the Fabric Composer API and presents a forged or substituted certificate. Because the API does not properly validate certificates, the client proceeds with the connection when a user or automated client initiates it (UI:R), allowing the attacker to observe sensitive information in transit. No public exploit identified at time of analysis; exploitation requires adjacent positioning and does not grant code execution or data modification.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Nov 03, 2026

Improper certificate validation in the HPE Networking Fabric Composer API allows an unauthenticated attacker positioned on the same adjacent network as a client to have a forged or substituted certificate accepted, exposing sensitive information read through that API channel. Impact is confidentiality-only (CVSS 5.7, C:H/I:N/A:N) and exploitation is not silent: the vector requires a legitimate client interaction (UI:R) plus an adjacent network position (AV:A) and a man-in-the-middle vantage point inside the management network. No public exploit code and no confirmed active exploitation were identified at time of analysis, and the current priority is a this-month patching cadence rather than emergency response.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch, fixed version, or workaround was identified in the available data at time of analysis, so the authoritative next step is to retrieve the HPE security bulletin (hpesbnw05172en_us) and apply the update it designates for the deployed Fabric Composer release; track this within the current monthly patch cycle given the this-month priority rather than as an emergency change. Because the assessed attack path requires the attacker to be on the adjacent network as a client talking to the API, the practical compensating control is to tighten segmentation so the Fabric Composer API and its clients are confined to a dedicated management segment with no broader L2 adjacency, accepting the operational cost of additional firewall/ACL rules and routed access. Certificate pinning or strict trust-anchor enforcement on the client side can reduce exposure to a substituted certificate but does not correct the server-side validation defect and adds certificate-rotation overhead. Neither measure is a substitute for the vendor fix, and the advisory should be re-checked for an explicit fixed-version list, since absence of patch data here is not confirmation that no fix exists.

Affected VersionsENISA

Fabric Composer 7.4.0 ≤7.4.0
Fabric Composer 7.0.0 ≤7.3.4

Affected Packages

euvd fabric_composer no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw sits in the certificate handling of the HPE Networking Fabric Composer API: the component fails to properly validate certificates presented in the client-server exchange, so an attacker able to intercept that traffic can substitute or forge a certificate that the API accepts. The supplied assessment scores it AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N, meaning no privileges are required on the attacker side but a legitimate client interaction must occur and the attacker must already sit on the adjacent or logically adjacent management network; nothing in the available sources names a product feature toggle, protocol detail, or specific code path beyond the API's certificate handling, and no CWE mapping was provided, so the exact trigger and root-cause class cannot be stated more precisely. The metrics describe severity and preconditions only, not the underlying mechanism, which is not described in the available sources. There is no integrity or availability impact: the exposure is disclosure of sensitive information crossing the API.

Know when Hpe gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (hpe) PRIMARY 5.7 MEDIUM
AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
vuln.today AI 5.7 MEDIUM

Improper cert validation enables an adjacent-network MITM needing no auth (AV:A/PR:N) but requiring a client to connect (UI:R); impact is confidentiality-only (C:H, I:N, A:N).

3.1 AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (hpe).

CVSS VectorVendor: hpe

Attack Vector
Adjacent
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

An improper certificate validation vulnerability exists in the API of HPE Networking Fabric Composer. Successful exploitation could allow an unauthenticated adjacent attacker to access sensitive information.

Threat Intelligence Overview

Prevalence
Low
niche enterprise data-center network fabric orchestration product, limited deployment footprint
Data Quality
2 sources
Confidence: Low

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS N/A
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Controlled
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium

Priority Score

28
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +28
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

More in Hpe

View all
CVE-2017-5689 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 02

An unprivileged network attacker could gain system privileges to provisioned Intel manageability SKUs: Intel Active Mana

CVE-2016-7434 HIGH POC
7.5 Jan 13

The read_mru_list function in NTP before 4.2.8p9 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a craf

CVE-2026-76708 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Sep 22

Default, hard-coded credentials shipped on several administrative and system accounts in HPE's Analytics and Location En

CVE-2024-53676 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 27

A directory traversal vulnerability in Hewlett Packard Enterprise Insight Remote Support may allow remote code execution

CVE-2022-37932 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 12

A potential security vulnerability has been identified in Hewlett Packard Enterprise OfficeConnect 1820, 1850, and 1920S

CVE-2020-7136 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 30

A security vulnerability in HPE Smart Update Manager (SUM) prior to version 8.5.6 could allow remote unauthorized access

CVE-2025-37097 HIGH POC
7.5 Jul 01

A vulnerability in HPE Insight Remote Support (IRS) prior to v7.15.0.646 may allow an unauthenticated denial of service

CVE-2019-8936 HIGH POC
7.5 May 15

NTP through 4.2.8p12 has a NULL Pointer Dereference. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely expl

CVE-2026-79849 CRITICAL
10.0 Oct 22

A maximum-severity, network-reachable flaw (CVSS 3.1 base 10.0) in an as-yet-unnamed HPE product allows remote attackers

CVE-2026-79848 CRITICAL
10.0 Oct 22

Unauthenticated network attackers can potentially achieve high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact again

CVE-2026-79851 CRITICAL
10.0 Oct 22

HPE security bulletin hpesbnw05162en_us documents a maximum-severity (CVSS 10.0) exposure in an HPE product that is not

CVE-2026-79847 CRITICAL
10.0 Oct 22

HPE advisory hpesbnw05162en_us covers a product flaw carrying a CVSS 3.1 base score of 10.0 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy