Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessUnknown initial access
-
ExploitUnspecified vulnerability in unidentified Ubuntu-tracked component
-
ImpactUndetermined impact
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V14 - Data Protection Data exposure prevention
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Collection, Discovery The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation prerequisites cannot be determined: the description is empty and no CVSS vector is provided, so attack vector, required privileges, user interaction, and any configuration or deployment preconditions are all unknown. The only contextual signal is that the flaw is tracked by Ubuntu security, implying it affects a package distributed with Ubuntu Linux, but the specific package, enabled-feature requirement, and whether default configurations are affected are not available from the input and must be retrieved from the Ubuntu CVE tracker and upstream advisory. |
| Impact | Risk cannot be meaningfully assessed from the provided data. No description, CVSS base score, CVSS vector, CWE, EPSS probability, KEV status, POC indicator, or SSVC decision points were supplied - every quantitative and qualitative risk signal is absent. The only datum is that the CVE was ingested from the Ubuntu vendor security tracker (vendor:ubuntu), which weakly implies the affected component is open-source software packaged in the Ubuntu distribution, but the specific package, attack vector, privilege requirement, and impact are all unknown. No exploitation status can be derived: no KEV listing and no POC signal were provided, so at time of analysis this is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis' - but note this reflects ABSENCE of data, not a confirmed negative. This entry should be treated as an unenriched placeholder requiring manual lookup against the Ubuntu CVE tracker and NVD before any prioritization decision; no priority ranking is defensible on current inputs. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | No realistic attack scenario can be constructed because the vulnerability description, affected product, and CVSS vector are all missing. The only known fact is that Ubuntu's security team is tracking this identifier, suggesting an affected package shipped in the distribution, but neither the flaw class nor the exploitation path is available. No POC availability was indicated in the input. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 24, 2026
Impact for CVE-2026-95295 cannot be determined from the available data: the record is tracked by the Ubuntu security team against a package distributed with Ubuntu Linux, but it carries no description, no CVSS vector, and no CWE classification, so the attack vector, required privileges, and user interaction requirements are all unconfirmed. Because no exploitation evidence, KEV listing, or public proof-of-concept is provided, there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the EPSS-style risk signal is absent. The practical consequence is that prioritization must be deferred until the Ubuntu CVE tracker and the corresponding upstream advisory are consulted to identify the specific package, the affected release(s), and whether default installations are exposed.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch has been identified at time of analysis, and the absence of a description, CVE-to-package mapping, and version data in the provided input means no exact fix version can be cited. The immediate action is to retrieve the authoritative record from the Ubuntu CVE tracker at https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-95295 and its linked upstream advisory, which will name the affected package and the release in which a fix is published; once known, apply the update with 'sudo apt update && sudo apt install --only-upgrade <package>' or a full 'sudo apt upgrade', and enable unattended-upgrades on servers that cannot be patched on a short cycle. Because the vulnerable package and its exposure surface are unknown, no specific compensating control (port blocking, feature disabling, endpoint restriction) can be recommended without risking either unnecessary service disruption or a false sense of coverage; the only defensible interim posture is to inventory Ubuntu hosts, confirm which of them run candidate packages once identified, and monitor the tracker and the Ubuntu security-notices mailing list for the fix and for any indications that exploitation is occurring in the meantime.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
No CPE strings, no CWE mapping, and no CVSS vector accompany this record, so the underlying technology, protocol, or library cannot be named with confidence. The single intelligence signal is the reporting source: the flaw is tracked by Ubuntu security (vendor:ubuntu), which indicates the affected component is a package shipped in the Ubuntu archive rather than a third-party product handled outside the distribution's security process. That matters methodologically because Ubuntu-tracked CVEs may be resolved by an Ubuntu-specific patch or by a Debian/Ubuntu packaging fix even when the upstream project has not issued its own release, so the root-cause class (memory corruption, injection, logic error, etc.) and the affected binary must be read from the Ubuntu CVE tracker entry rather than inferred. Until that entry is retrieved, any statement about the vulnerable subsystem, the deployment models at risk, or whether exploitation requires a non-default configuration would be speculation.
Know when the next one hits your stack
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
Sources disagree (Medium–Critical)AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
vuln.today treats the vendor’s rating as authoritative. A higher third-party CVSS (e.g. CISA-ADP) is shown for transparency but does not drive the headline severity.
CVSS VectorVendor: vendor:ubuntu
DescriptionCVE.org
[Unknown description]
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
Same weakness CWE-200 – Information Exposure
View allSame technique Information Disclosure
View allVendor StatusVendor
SUSE
Severity: Critical| Product | Status |
|---|---|
| SUSE Package Hub 15 SP7 | Fixed |
| openSUSE Leap 16.0 | Fixed |
| openSUSE Tumbleweed | Fixed |
| SUSE Package Hub 15 SP7 | Affected |
EUVD-2026-89121
GHSA-cvfh-9v95-9q48
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Exploit-DB