Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain low-privileged local access
-
DeliveryInvoke Storage Spaces Controller code path
-
ExploitTrigger use-after-free and groom freed memory
-
ExecutionHijack execution for arbitrary code
-
ImpactElevate to SYSTEM privileges
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Memory lifecycle management
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to already possess local, authenticated access to the Windows host with at least low-level privileges (CVSS PR:L) - this is not remotely reachable (AV:L). The specific trigger is the use-after-free in the Storage Spaces Controller, so the attacker must be able to reach and exercise that component's code path on the affected build. No user interaction is required (UI:N) and attack complexity is low (AC:L) once local access is held. Limiting factors: the need for an existing local foothold constrains this to post-compromise or insider scenarios, and it only applies to the unpatched Windows build ranges listed (e.g., Windows 11 24H2 before 10.0.26100.9711, Windows Server 2025 before 10.0.26100.33650, and the 25H2/26H1/26H2 builds in the EUVD advisory). Patched builds are not exploitable. |
| Impact | This is a credible but not emergency-tier priority. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 7.8 HIGH) describes a local privilege-escalation bug requiring the attacker to already have low-level authenticated access to the host, with low attack complexity and no user interaction once that foothold exists. The SSVC decision framework reinforces a measured posture: Exploitation is 'none' (no observed or public exploitation), Automatable is 'no' (consistent with AV:L - it cannot be sprayed remotely at scale), but Technical Impact is 'total' (consistent with C:H/I:H/A:H and a use-after-free that typically yields SYSTEM-level code execution). There is no CISA KEV listing and no POC indicated in the provided data, and EPSS is not supplied; absence of these signals is not evidence of safety but does argue against widespread active exploitation today. The practical risk is therefore a reliable local escalation primitive for an attacker who has already landed on a Windows host - valuable in a post-compromise/second-stage chain rather than as an initial access vector. One note on the input metadata: the description and impact set (C:H/I:H/A:H, 'elevate privileges') describe elevation of privilege, yet the tags include 'Denial Of Service'; use-after-free bugs can cause DoS, but the authoritative impact here is privilege escalation, so treat the DoS tag as secondary. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who has already gained low-privileged code execution on a Windows host (e.g., via phishing, a compromised standard user account, or a prior foothold) invokes the vulnerable Storage Spaces Controller code path to trigger the use-after-free, grooming freed memory to gain control of execution and elevate to SYSTEM. No public exploit code is identified at the time of analysis, and no user interaction is required once local access exists. This is a classic post-exploitation local privilege-escalation step rather than a remote entry point. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 13, 2026
Local privilege escalation in the Windows Storage Spaces Controller lets an attacker who already holds a low-privileged, authenticated session on an affected Windows host trigger a use-after-free and run code at a higher integrity level. The flaw is rated CVSS 7.8 (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) and requires no user interaction and no remote reachability - the foothold is the barrier, not the exploitation itself. CISA's SSVC assessment records Exploitation: none and Automatable: no, and no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis; patched vendor builds (e.g., Windows 11 24H2 at 10.0.26100.9711 or later, Windows Server 2025 at 10.0.26100.33650 or later) are not exploitable, so the practical risk sits with unpatched, already-compromised or insider-accessible endpoints and servers.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patches are available: apply the Microsoft monthly security update so that each affected platform reaches at least its fixed build - Windows 11 24H2 to 10.0.26100.9711, Windows 11 25H2 to 10.0.26200.9711, Windows 11 26H2 to 10.0.26300.9711, Windows 11 26H1 to 10.0.28000.3231, and Windows Server 2025 (including Server Core) to 10.0.26100.33650; confirm the deployed build with winver or the registry CurrentBuild/UBR values and verify against the MSRC guidance at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-88100 and the EUVD entry EUVD-2026-99652. Patch status per vendor is confirmed, so there is no need for stopgap configuration changes on systems that can be updated. Where immediate patching is not possible, treat this as a post-compromise escalation primitive and prioritize the affected hosts that already carry the highest risk: because exploitation requires an existing authenticated local session (PR:L, AV:L) and no user interaction (UI:N), the effective compensating controls are reducing who and what can reach an interactive or service session on the host (removing unnecessary local admin and interactive logon rights, constraining RDP/console access, and containing low-privileged code execution via WDAC/AppLocker or EDR blocking of suspicious storage-driver-triggering activity), on the understanding that these only raise the cost of an already-required foothold rather than removing the flaw. Disabling or not using Storage Spaces on hosts that do not need pooled storage removes the reachable code path entirely, at the cost of losing the pooled-volume feature; note that this is a configuration change with operational impact and is generally less preferable than patching. There is no evidence that network-level filtering (firewall rules, port blocking) mitigates this issue, since the vector is strictly local, and no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 6 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The affected component is the Windows Storage Spaces Controller, the kernel-mode driver stack that lets Windows pool physical disks into storage spaces and present them as virtual volumes; it is reachable through storage-pool configuration and I/O paths exercised by local callers. The root cause is a use-after-free (CWE-416): the driver frees an internal object (for example a request, context, or buffer structure) but continues to dereference or reuse that pointer, so a local attacker who can drive the relevant configuration or I/O path can shape heap reuse and gain control of the freed memory. Because this code runs in kernel mode, successful corruption converts a low-privileged local session into kernel-level execution, which explains the C:H/I:H/A:H impact sub-score despite the modest attack vector. The CVSS vector confirms the prerequisites unambiguously - PR:L means an authenticated low-privileged local user is needed, AV:L confirms it is not remotely reachable, UI:N means no victim interaction is required, and AC:L means the exploitation conditions are not gated by race timing or heavy memory-layout grooming once the code path is reachable. SSVC scores the technical impact as total but Automation: no, consistent with a local-only, targeted privilege-escalation primitive rather than a wormable or mass-scannable defect. Portions of the Storage Spaces stack run in user-mode as well, but the memory-safety failure and the elevation outcome point to the kernel driver layer.
Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Local-only use-after-free requiring an existing low-privileged foothold (AV:L, PR:L), easily triggered with no user interaction (AC:L, UI:N), yielding full SYSTEM compromise (C/I/A:H).
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Use after free in Windows Storage Spaces Controller allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Executive ViewAI
A high-severity local privilege escalation flaw in the Windows Storage Spaces Controller could let an attacker who already has a low-level foothold on a Windows 11 24H2 or Windows Server 2025 system gain elevated access, potentially compromising sensitive data or critical operations. With no public exploit identified at time of analysis, the risk is highest for unpatched, already-compromised, or insider-accessible systems, so leadership should ensure these assets are prioritized for patching to avoid escalation of an existing breach.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Use-after-free vulnerabilities occur when a program continues to access memory through a pointer after that memory has been deallocated.
Memory corruption occurs when a program writes data beyond the boundaries of allocated memory regions or accesses memory in unintended ways, violating the integrity of the process's address space.
Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio
Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in
A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr
Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables
Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker
Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b
An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote
FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit
Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio
Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred
Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/
React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo
EUVD-2026-99652
GHSA-w7p9-wjww-3xqp
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB