Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain authenticated local foothold
-
ExploitInteract with Windows DHCP Server service
-
ExecutionExploit improper authentication check
-
ImpactBypass DHCP security feature (integrity impact)
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A07:2025 - Authentication Failures
ASVS 5.0
V6 - Authentication Alternate path authentication
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires local access to a Windows Server (or Windows 10 1607/1809) host that has the DHCP Server role installed and running, and the attacker must already possess low-level authenticated privileges on that host (CVSS PR:L) - it cannot be triggered remotely or by an unauthenticated user. No user interaction is needed (UI:N). The impact is confined to an integrity-only security-feature bypass within DHCP Server (C:N/A:N), so limiting factors are the prerequisite local authenticated foothold and the fact that only servers actually running the DHCP role are affected; the specific configuration or feature targeted is not disclosed in the vendor advisory. |
| Impact | This is a genuinely moderate, low-urgency issue rather than a high-priority emergency. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N, score 5.5) describes a locally exploitable flaw requiring the attacker to already hold low-level privileges on the host, with impact limited to integrity (a security-feature bypass) and no confidentiality or availability effect. Multiple signals agree that this is not under active attack: no CISA KEV listing, no public POC identified, and CISA's SSVC decision framework rates Exploitation as 'none', Automatable as 'no', and Technical Impact as only 'partial'. These are all consistent and point to low real-world risk despite the integrity bypass. The main caveat is that Microsoft's MSRC advisory (the sole substantive source) provides no technical detail about which specific DHCP security feature is bypassed, so the practical consequence of the integrity impact cannot be independently characterized - verify the exact protected control with the vendor. No EPSS score was provided in the input, so exploitation probability could not be weighed quantitatively. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who already has an authenticated low-privilege foothold on a Windows Server running the DHCP Server role locally manipulates the service to defeat one of its security checks (an improper-authentication / authentication-bypass weakness, CWE-288), undermining the integrity of a DHCP security feature. No public exploit code has been identified, and the attack requires local access with existing privileges, so this is a privilege/security-control bypass on an already-compromised host rather than a remote entry point. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026
A security-feature bypass in the Windows DHCP Server role allows an attacker who already holds low-privileged local access on the host to circumvent an authentication control, producing a high integrity impact while leaving confidentiality and availability unaffected. Exploitation requires local access to a machine running the DHCP Server role and a pre-existing authenticated foothold (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N), so it cannot be triggered remotely or by an unauthenticated user. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis - CISA's SSVC assessment records exploitation as "none" and automatable as "no" - and the vendor has released fixes, making this a genuinely moderate, low-urgency issue rather than a high-priority emergency. Affected platforms span Windows Server 2012 through Windows Server 2025 (including Server Core installations) plus Windows 10 versions 1607 and 1809.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: Microsoft has published fixes for this issue, and patch availability is confirmed from the vendor, so the primary action is to apply the current cumulative update that moves each affected platform to or beyond the build level at which the vulnerable range closes - 6.2.9200.26434 for Windows Server 2012, 6.3.9600.23470 for Windows Server 2012 R2, 10.0.14393.9612 for Windows Server 2016 and Windows 10 1607, 10.0.17763.9376 for Windows Server 2019 and Windows 10 1809, 10.0.20348.5761 for Windows Server 2022, and 10.0.26100.33650 for Windows Server 2025 - following the MSRC advisory at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-85865. Because exploitation requires an existing low-privileged local session (PR:L) and only hosts with the DHCP Server role running are exposed, the practical compensating controls are to remove or disable the DHCP Server role on machines that do not genuinely need to serve leases (a clean reduction in attack surface, with the trade-off that any dependent clients must be moved to another DHCP source), and to tighten who can obtain interactive or RDP logon on DHCP servers, since eliminating the prerequisite local foothold neutralises the bypass entirely - the trade-off being reduced administrative convenience for helpdesk and operations staff. Restricting local logon rights via group policy and monitoring for unexpected changes to DHCP Server configuration provide additional detection coverage while updates roll out; no other specific configuration-level workaround for the underlying authentication bypass is documented in the available vendor data.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 13 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause class is CWE-288, Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel, which means the DHCP Server component exposes a code path or interface that reaches a privileged function without correctly enforcing the intended authentication check. Because the CVSS vector is AV:L/PR:L, the attacker must already be logged on locally with low privileges; the bypass then defeats a security feature that would otherwise constrain that user, which is why the vector scores integrity high (I:H) but confidentiality and availability as none (C:N/A:N) and scope as unchanged (S:U). The Windows DHCP Server role is a service that leases IP configuration to network clients, and it typically runs with elevated service privileges on the host, so a bypass of one of its access controls can let a local user manipulate DHCP Server state they should not be able to touch, though the vendor advisory does not disclose the specific feature or configuration targeted. CISA's SSVC decision framework classifies this as exploitation: none, automatable: no, and technical impact: partial, and the ENISA EUVD entry (EUVD-2026-99568) tracks the same build-level affected ranges. Only hosts with the DHCP Server role actually installed and running are in scope; workstations and servers without that role are not exposed to this issue.
Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Local, low-privilege authenticated attacker (AV:L/PR:L) with no user interaction; impact is an integrity-only security-feature bypass (I:H, C:N/A:N), matching the authentication-bypass weakness.
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Improper authentication in Windows DHCP Server allows an authorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio
Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in
A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr
Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables
Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker
An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote
FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit
Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio
Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/
React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo
Command injection in the Windows Shell lets remote, unauthenticated attackers bypass a Windows security feature and then
External control of file name or path in Windows NTLM allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network
EUVD-2026-99568
GHSA-5352-p32h-28fg
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB