Skip to main content

Windows Error Reporting CVE-2026-85354

| EUVDEUVD-2026-99480 HIGH
Use After Free (CWE-416)
2026-10-13 secure@microsoft.com GHSA-mxx9-hjp2-qx4c
7.0
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: microsoft
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain local low-privileged account
  2. Exploit
    Trigger WER operation freeing in-use object
  3. Execution
    Win race to reclaim freed memory
  4. Impact
    Execute code as SYSTEM

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Memory lifecycle management
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to already possess a local, authenticated low-privileged account on the target (CVSS PR:L, AV:L) and to interact with the Windows Error Reporting (WER) subsystem to trigger the use-after-free. No user interaction from a victim is needed (UI:N). The primary limiting factor is high attack complexity (AC:H): because this is a CWE-416 use-after-free, reliable exploitation almost certainly depends on winning a memory-reclamation race, which may require repeated attempts and controlled heap conditions. There are no network-exploitable paths (local access only) and no default remote exposure; risk is concentrated on multi-user, shared, or terminal-server hosts where untrusted users can execute code locally. Patched builds listed in the EUVD matrix (e.g., 10.0.26100.9711 for 24H2, 10.0.17763.9376 for Server 2019) remediate the condition.

Impact

This is a moderate-priority local elevation-of-privilege flaw rather than an urgent crisis, and the available signals are mutually consistent on that point. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U, C:H/I:H/A:H, base 7.0 High) describes a locally exploitable use-after-free that requires an already-authenticated low-privileged foothold and has high attack complexity - typical of a race condition that must be won to control the freed object. CISA's SSVC framework reinforces low immediate urgency: Exploitation is 'none' (no observed or public exploitation), Automatable is 'no' (local, non-scalable), though Technical Impact is 'total,' matching the C:H/I:H/A:H impact and a likely jump to SYSTEM. There is no EPSS score in the provided data and no KEV listing, so this is NOT confirmed actively exploited; combined with no POC indicator, the real-world exploitation probability is currently low. No signals conflict here - a High CVSS driven by total impact, tempered by local access, low-privilege prerequisite, and high complexity, with no evidence of exploitation. Priority is 'patch in normal cycle' for most environments, elevated for multi-user hosts where untrusted users hold local accounts.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who already has a low-privileged local account on a Windows host (for example a standard user on a shared workstation, RDP session host, or a foothold gained via another vulnerability) triggers the Windows Error Reporting component in a way that frees an object still in use, then wins a timing race to reclaim and control that freed memory, executing attacker-controlled code with SYSTEM privileges. The high attack complexity (AC:H) means the race may need multiple attempts, and no public exploit code has been identified at the time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026

Local privilege escalation in Windows Error Reporting (WER) lets an attacker who already holds a low-privileged, authenticated account on a Windows host trigger a use-after-free in the WER subsystem and elevate to SYSTEM-level code execution. The flaw spans a very broad set of supported releases - Windows 10 1607 through 22H2, Windows 11 23H2/24H2/25H2/26H1/26H2, and Windows Server 2012 through 2025 (including Server Core installations) - but exploitation requires local access and is rated high complexity (CVSS 7.0, AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N), since reliable abuse almost certainly depends on winning a memory-reclamation race under controlled heap conditions. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis and CISA's SSVC framework records exploitation as 'none'; vendor-released patch builds are available for each affected branch, making this routine patch-cycle work rather than emergency response.

RemediationAI

Apply the Microsoft security update for this CVE (MSRC Update Guide, https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-85354), which delivers vendor-released patch builds for every affected branch: 10.0.14393.9612 for Windows 10 1607 and Server 2016, 10.0.17763.9376 for Windows 10 1809 and Server 2019, 10.0.19044.7807 for Windows 10 21H2/22H2, 10.0.22631.7652 for Windows 11 23H2, 10.0.26100.9711 for Windows 11 24H2, 10.0.26200.9711 for 25H2, 10.0.26300.9711 for 26H2, 10.0.28000.3231 for 26H1, 6.2.9200.26434 for Server 2012, 6.3.9600.23470 for Server 2012 R2, 10.0.20348.5761 for Server 2022, and 10.0.26100.33650 for Server 2025. Because exploitation is local and requires an existing authenticated account, prioritise multi-user, shared, and Remote Desktop/terminal-server hosts where untrusted or semi-trusted users can execute code; hardening that reduces the number of local interactive accounts, and enforcing least privilege so unrelated users cannot launch arbitrary binaries on such hosts, shrinks the attack surface but is a compensating measure, not a substitute for patching. Disabling or restricting Windows Error Reporting (for example via policy so that user-mode crash handling and dump collection are suppressed) can remove the vulnerable code path, with the trade-off that it also removes diagnostic crash telemetry and dump capture used for troubleshooting and forensic triage. Monitor for unexpected crashes in WER components as a possible sign of trigger attempts, and note that no public exploit code is known at time of analysis, so normal patch-cycle deployment is appropriate.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 20 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Windows Error Reporting is the crash- and fault-telemetry subsystem delivered by the WER service components (WerSvc service, werfault.exe/werfaultsecure.exe, and the associated report queue and dump-handling paths). WER processes untrusted data derived from crashing or misbehaving user-mode processes, which makes its internal object lifetimes a privilege boundary: code running in the WER context can hold higher integrity than the process whose fault is being reported. The root cause here is CWE-416 (Use After Free) - a heap object is released while a stale pointer to it remains reachable, and a subsequent dereference operates on memory that the attacker may have influenced through reallocation. This class of bug typically requires heap grooming and timing control to weaponize, which is consistent with the assessed CVSS vector CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H: local access (AV:L) by an authenticated low-privileged user (PR:L), no victim interaction (UI:N), high attack complexity (AC:H) from the race/reclamation requirement, and total loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability (C:H/I:H/A:H) if the elevation succeeds. There is no network-reachable path and no default remote exposure; the associated tags (Memory Corruption, Use After Free, Denial Of Service) reflect the fact that a failed or partial trigger can also crash the WER handler before any elevation is achieved.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.0 HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.0 HIGH

Local-only access (AV:L) by an authenticated low-privileged user (PR:L); the use-after-free requires winning a race, so AC:H; successful exploitation yields SYSTEM, giving full C/I/A impact.

3.1 AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:20 cve.org
HIGH 7.0

DescriptionCVE.org

Use after free in Windows Error Reporting allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A high-severity local privilege-escalation flaw in the Windows Error Reporting (WER) subsystem affects nearly the entire organizational Windows estate - Windows 10 (1607 through 22H2), Windows 11 (23H2, 24H2, 25H2, 26H1, and 26H2), and Windows Server 2012 through 2025 including Server Core. Exploitation requires an attacker to already hold a low-privileged authenticated account on the host and to successfully win a high-complexity memory-reclamation race (CVSS 7.0, AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N), so the real-world concern is escalation of an existing foothold to SYSTEM-level control rather than a new intrusion path; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. With vendor patches already released for every affected branch, leadership should treat this as mandatory patch-cycle work spread across a very large fleet rather than an emergency response.

Business Impact: Medium
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 85% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Windows Error Reporting ships in all supported Windows client and server editions
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
Medium
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

35
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +35
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Use-after-free vulnerabilities occur when a program continues to access memory through a pointer after that memory has been deallocated.

Memory corruption occurs when a program writes data beyond the boundaries of allocated memory regions or accesses memory in unintended ways, violating the integrity of the process's address space.

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2025-13315 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-13316 HIGH POC
8.2 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy