Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessDeliver malicious app to user
-
DeliveryInstall app on Apple device
-
ExploitApp calls restricted system API
-
ExecutionPermission check bypassed
-
PersistRead sensitive user data
-
ImpactExfiltrate data to attacker
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Access control enforcement
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Defense Evasion The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | The attacker must already be able to execute code as an installed third-party application on the target Apple device (CVSS PR:L, AV:L) - this is not remotely reachable and not unauthenticated in the network sense. The app must invoke the specific framework/API whose permission check was weakened; no special user interaction (UI:N), elevated privileges, jailbreak, or physical access to a locked device is required once the app is running, and the vulnerable code is present in default configurations across all five affected platform families. Exploitation is limited by the fact that the attacker needs a delivery path for the malicious app (App Store review, sideloading, MDM/enterprise signing, or a compromised developer certificate), by the impact being read-only disclosure of user data rather than code execution or data modification (C:H/I:N/A:N), and by the need to target a device that has not yet been updated to iOS/iPadOS 26.7 or 27, macOS Golden Gate 27, tvOS 27, visionOS 27, or watchOS 27. |
| Impact | Multiple signals point to a moderate, locally-scoped issue rather than a crisis. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N, 5.5) confirms the attacker must already have the ability to run code as a local app on the device, cannot reach the target over the network, and gains only data disclosure. EPSS is 0.20% at the 10th percentile, there is no CISA KEV listing, and SSVC rates exploitation as 'none', automatable as 'no', and technical impact as 'partial'. The single notable amplifier is that Apple platforms are ubiquitous and the affected base is enormous, so a working exploit would have significant privacy impact at scale - but nothing in the current intelligence suggests that exploit exists publicly. One data caveat: the tag list includes 'Authentication Bypass', which does not match a CWE-284 confidentiality-only permissions issue; treat that tag as unverified. Also note the macOS CPE and EUVD affected-version list (macOS 0 <27) indicate macOS Golden Gate is affected alongside the mobile/watch/vision platforms. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker convinces a user to install - or slips through review with - an app on an iPhone, iPad, Mac, Apple TV, Apple Vision, or Apple Watch. Once running with only normal app privileges, the app calls the poorly restricted system API, which returns protected user data such as personal records or files that the app's entitlements should never have permitted. The app then exfiltrates that data to an attacker-controlled server. No public proof-of-concept is known, so this remains a theoretical but low-complexity (AC:L, UI:N) local attack. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 15, 2026
Improper access control in Apple's operating system family (iOS/iPadOS, macOS, tvOS, visionOS, watchOS) lets a locally installed app bypass intended permission restrictions and read sensitive user data it should not be able to reach. Apple addressed the flaw with additional restrictions in iOS 26.7/iPadOS 26.7, iOS 27/iPadOS 27, macOS Golden Gate 27, tvOS 27, visionOS 27, and watchOS 27. Exploitation requires the attacker to already run code on the device as an app (PR:L, AV:L), and no public exploit code or active exploitation has been identified; EPSS is only 0.20% (10th percentile) and CISA SSVC records exploitation as 'none'.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patches: iOS 26.7 and iPadOS 26.7, iOS 27 and iPadOS 27, macOS Golden Gate 27, tvOS 27, visionOS 27, and watchOS 27 - upgrade every affected device to these versions or later, prioritising iPhone/iPad and Macs that hold sensitive personal or corporate data. Because the flaw is local-only and the attacker must already run an installed app, there is no practical server-side workaround: App Store review and enterprise app allowlisting/MDM restrictions on sideloaded applications are the main compensating controls, since a malicious app must first be installed. Those protections are imperfect - sideloading, enterprise-signed apps, and compromised developer certificates can bypass them - and they do not fix devices already running a malicious app, so apply the OS update rather than relying on app-distribution controls alone. Deployment detail and per-platform guidance are in Apple's security notes at https://support.apple.com/en-us/149034, https://support.apple.com/en-us/149035, https://support.apple.com/en-us/149036, https://support.apple.com/en-us/149037, https://support.apple.com/en-us/149038, and https://support.apple.com/en-us/149041.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 5 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause is classified as CWE-284 (Improper Access Control), which in Apple's ecosystem typically means a system framework, entitlement check, or sandbox/TCC-style permission gate did not adequately validate the calling process before returning protected data. Because the affected CPEs span the entire Apple platform line (ios_and_ipados, macos, tvos, visionos, watchos), the vulnerable component is almost certainly a shared system service or framework rather than a per-platform feature. The CVSS impact is confidentiality-only (C:H/I:N/A:N with S:U), indicating the bypass grants read access to sensitive user data but does not let the app modify data, escalate to kernel privileges, or affect other systems. Apple fixed it by strengthening the permission checks ('addressed with additional restrictions'), a pattern consistent with a missing or overly permissive entitlement/authorization validation on an API exposed to third-party apps.
Know when macOS gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Attacker must already run code as a local app (AV:L, PR:L) with no user interaction; the bypass discloses sensitive data only, so C:H with I:N/A:N.
Primary rating from Vendor (apple).
CVSS VectorVendor: apple
Lifecycle Timeline
4DescriptionCVE.org
A permissions issue was addressed with additional restrictions. This issue is fixed in iOS 26.7 and iPadOS 26.7, iOS 27 and iPadOS 27, macOS Golden Gate 27, tvOS 27, visionOS 27, watchOS 27. An app may be able to access sensitive user data.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
An unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote for Mac, a macOS remote control utility develope
Out-of-bounds write in Apple's iOS, iPadOS, and macOS file-parsing code lets remote attackers achieve arbitrary code exe
Apple's kernel across all platforms (iOS, macOS, watchOS, visionOS, tvOS) contains a memory corruption vulnerability (CV
The issue was addressed with improved checks. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.0). Actively exploited in the wild (cisa kev)
A logic issue was addressed with improved restrictions. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no authent
In Sudo before 1.9.12p2, the sudoedit (aka -e) feature mishandles extra arguments passed in the user-provided environmen
A race condition was addressed with additional validation. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.0), this vulnerability is no auth
This issue was addressed with improved checks. Rated critical severity (CVSS 10.0), this vulnerability is remotely explo
A carefully crafted request body can cause a buffer overflow in the mod_lua multipart parser (r:parsebody() called from
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Laundry on Linux, MacOS allows to perform an Account Takeover. This i
A vulnerability was found in LibTIFF. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no aut
Use of Out-of-range Pointer Offset in GitHub repository vim/vim prior to 8.2.4440. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this
EUVD-2026-77958
GHSA-c4g5-838m-mcm4
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB